Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Budget Lays Groundwork for Universal Gun Registry
Gun Owners of America ^ | 10 April 2014 | Gun Owners

Posted on 04/10/2014 4:20:23 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Impy; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; Bender2; ...

F*** ‘em.

No compliance.


21 posted on 04/10/2014 7:08:09 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; Bender2; GeronL

So the gun-registry thing is anitem in Obama’s budget? The same budget that got all of two votes in the House today? I wouldn’t worry about that thing ever becoming law.


22 posted on 04/10/2014 7:10:37 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yes, much of that contains steel cores. And 7.62x39 pistols do exist. Hence this applies:

(B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means—
(i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium

We’ve known this one was coming for a long time. Just when.
Olympic Arms inadvertently initiated the issue, IIRC.


23 posted on 04/10/2014 7:10:55 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I will never, ever register a single firearm. I long ago stopped buying ammo and accessories with credit cards - cash only. I will fight to keep my rights. Trying to take my weapons is more than justification enough for me to use them.


24 posted on 04/10/2014 7:37:26 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
6 ... And there is a law on the books that specifically prohibits the maintenance of a federal, permanent record. Specifically. This type of lawlessness can end only one way. Trials and hangings.

1. Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (1968): ATF Form 4473
The Form 4473 contains name, address, date of birth, government-issued photo ID, National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) background check transaction number, make/model/serial number of the firearm, and a short federal affidavit stating that the purchaser is eligible to purchase firearms under federal law. Lying on this form is a felony and can be punished by up to 5 years in prison in addition to fines, even if the transaction is simply denied by the NICS, although prosecutions are rare in the absence of another felony committed with the gun purchased. The dealer also records all information from the Form 4473 into their "bound-book". A dealer must keep this on file at least 20 years and is required to surrender the log to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) upon retirement from the firearms business. The ATF is allowed to inspect, as well as request a copy of the Form 4473 from the dealer during the course of a criminal investigation. In addition, the sale of 2 or more handguns to a person in a 5 day period must be reported to ATF on Form 3310.4.

Given todays smart phone technology, seems to me it wouldn't be hard for ATF agents to scan all the forms at gun stores to create a permanent registry. Just have to have the will to ignore the law.

2. Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (1993)
The Brady Act requires that background checks be conducted on individuals before a firearm may be purchased from a federally licensed dealer, manufacturer or importer —unless an exception applies. It directed the Attorney General to create the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). In 1998, the 5-day waiting period for handgun sales was replaced by an instant computerized background check that involved no waiting periods, although many states continue to mandate state run background checks before a gun dealer may transfer a firearm to a buyer.

3. Tiahrt Amendments (since 2003)
The Tiahrt Amendment prohibits the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) from releasing information from its firearms trace database to anyone other than a law enforcement agency or prosecutor in connection with a criminal investigation. Additionally, any data so released is inadmissible in a civil lawsuit. Some groups, including the Mayors Against Illegal Guns Coalition, believe that having further access to the ATF database would help municipal police departments track down sellers of illegal guns and curb crime. These groups are trying to undo the Tiahrt Amendment. Numerous police organizations oppose the Tiahrt Amendment, such as the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) and the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP). Conversely, the Tiahrt Amendment is supported by the National Rifle Association, and the Fraternal Order of Police (although it allows municipal police departments only limited access to ATF trace data in any criminal investigation).

The Tiahrt Amendments require the FBI to destroy all approved gun purchaser records within 24 hours of approval - NICS, not Form 4473.

Makes you wonder how a presidential EO could get around the Tiahrt Amendment.

25 posted on 04/10/2014 8:21:58 PM PDT by MacNaughton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

F’em.


26 posted on 04/10/2014 8:41:01 PM PDT by glock rocks (If you like your health plan, you're a racist !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Not happening, no chance.

Remember FIST?

27 posted on 04/10/2014 10:16:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
There's fixin' to be a few hundred million Federal "felons" in the Nation.

Any bets they are much more organized when it is time to come after us than they ever were in going after illegals?

28 posted on 04/11/2014 4:36:36 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It Is Revealed That Under NY SAFE Act Guns Can be Confiscated Without Warrant or Review
April 10 2014
by Dan Cannon
Share This Post

ny new york flagNew York’s gun control package that passed under the cover of night following the Sandy Hook shootings keeps revealing itself to be an even bigger turd than anyone ever thought possible.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, a new lawsuit alleges that “under NY law guns can be seized without warrant or review.” The report goes into more detail,

Under the SAFE Act, the New York Department of Criminal Justice (NYDCJ), the overseer of the database, may declare a person ineligible to own or possess a weapon without any type of judicial process.

Furthermore, the suit argues that if the NYDCJ declares a person ineligible, “such a determination makes the person vulnerable to imminent seizure of all weapons, without a hearing or even an arrest warrant.”

The attorneys indicate the state is creating a separate database from the federal NICS database but does not have the NICS protections, such as an appeals process. Their website details all the differences between the state and federal database.

Definitely a disturbing process. It’s no wonder that it is widely thought New York residents will most likely refuse to adhere to the state’s new registration requirements (deadline later this month).

The suit alleges that the process, as outlined, could result in both Second and Fourth Amendment rights violations without due process.

The law firm handling the suit has placed the documents relating to the case online at their website.

http://gunssavelives.net/blog/court-cases/it-is-revealed-that-under-ny-safe-act-guns-can-be-confiscated-without-warrant-or-review/


29 posted on 04/11/2014 5:34:51 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson