Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal agency vows to continue legal action after ending Nevada ranch standoff [BLM v Bundy]
FOX News ^ | April 13, 2014 | Edmund DeMarche, Matt Finn and the AP contributed to this report

Posted on 04/13/2014 2:17:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

The Bureau of Land Management vowed Saturday that it would continue its legal fight to remove illegal cattle from a rural Nevada range after ending a tense weeklong standoff with a rancher and his supporters.

"After 20 years and multiple court orders to remove the trespass cattle, [rancher Cliven] Bundy owes the American taxpayers in excess of $1 million. The BLM will continue to work to resolve the matter administratively and judicially," a statement from the bureau said. "We ask that all parties in the area remain peaceful and law-abiding as the Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service work to end the operation in an orderly manner."

The BLM also announced that it was wrapping up its month-long operation to seize the 900 cattle roaming on federally owned land approximately 80 miles northeast of Las Vegas and would release the 400 head of Bundy's cattle it had already seized "in order to avoid violence and help restore order."

"Based on information about conditions on the ground, and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concern about the safety of employees and members of the public," the statement read.," the statement read.

Bureau officials had dismantled designated protest areas supporting Bundy, who they say refuses to comply with the "same laws that 16,000 public land ranchers do every year."

A group of about 1,000 supporting Bundy cheered and sang "The Star Spangled Banner" when BLM made its announcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: banglist; blm; bundy; bundyranch; bunkerville; defendingliberty; fascism; govtabuse; militia; patriots; secondamendment; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-174 next last
To: Jacquerie

I would pay a lot for a ticket to see harry mess himself. Proceeds should go to the Bundy fund.

Little Neil, described by his classmates as charismatic, could end up taking a long walk off of a short pier career wise... I would hope. ‘course he can just work for daddy in the gold mine.


81 posted on 04/13/2014 9:02:32 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 12th_Monkey

It’s true he was technically violating the law, but the law is an ass.

Is it wrong to disobey illegitimate administrative rulings based on bad science intended to a achieve a predetermined policy goal based on ideology?

His non-cooperation with the BLM has it’s history in the Sagebrush Rebellion of the nineties when the BLM and USFS was fully taken over by the environmentals who saw the election of Bill Clinton as their chance to conform public lands policy to their earth mother Gaia belief system.


82 posted on 04/13/2014 9:04:31 AM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Via: gun free zone.net

83 posted on 04/13/2014 9:07:32 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It seems to me that Bundy now has abundant grounds to file a suit of his own. He has lost before but the issue was his action toward the BLM, non payment of fees.

He now has grounds for a suit to settle the basic issue....does BLM own the land and have the legal right to enforce grazing rights


84 posted on 04/13/2014 9:09:01 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
After this brouhaha, every conservative legal eagle and constitutional scholar in the United States willl be lining up to represent Bundy

I sure hope you're correct. Otherwise the feds will bankrupt him with legal fees.

85 posted on 04/13/2014 9:35:39 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Sorry, but IMHO unless the Constitution is amended, it states EXACTLY what the Fed. Gov’t has control...and 80% of the West isn’t one of ‘em.

We have all seen what kind of ‘stewards’ Fedzilla comes down to: out-of-control controlled burns, Super Fund sites (what once was good is now bad = taxpayer $$), porous Southern border (one of the FEW numerated powers, and they can’t get this ONE right)...


86 posted on 04/13/2014 9:38:00 AM PDT by i_robot73 (Give me one example and I will show where gov't is the root of the problem(s).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Your argument was lost when Jefferson bought Louisiana. I don’t think that anyone is seriously considering giving it back to the French.


87 posted on 04/13/2014 9:46:15 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73
unless the Constitution is amended, it states EXACTLY what the Fed. Gov’t has control...and 80% of the West isn’t one of ‘em.

Do a quick search on "homestead act" and you'll see about seven or eight Congressional actions.

>> The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 ended homesteading; by that time, federal government policy had shifted to retaining control of western public lands. <<

This action needs to be declared unConstitutional and thrown in the trash. Homesteading needs to resume or outright sale of the lands...TO US CITIZENS.

88 posted on 04/13/2014 10:01:10 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I suppose anyone with any sense is out squatting on federal land right now. Nothing like getting free stuff.


89 posted on 04/13/2014 10:14:10 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Show me the law that says the federal government owns that land.

The federal government can lease public land, and can manage public land, and can hold public land in trust. But it does not OWN public land.


90 posted on 04/13/2014 10:32:09 AM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: 12th_Monkey

You are something much worse than ignorant.


91 posted on 04/13/2014 10:50:28 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

If the government wants to go the eminent domain route, they’d have to pay Bundy. Instead, they want what he has for free. See the difference?


92 posted on 04/13/2014 10:52:57 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

I gave a feeling that there are a great many (conservative) attorneys who would be ecstatic to take on this case pro bono, simply for the positive publicity it’ll give the firm.

Being the archetypal “Good Guy” in a high profile case such as this will win a great many friends - and a great many new clients.


93 posted on 04/13/2014 10:53:10 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
The federal government can lease public land, and can manage public land, and can hold public land in trust. But it does not OWN public land.

Well, that is exactly what the BLM claims they were doing, leasing the forage rights and managing them. I think Bundy is technically not in legal compliance, but the BLM is ethically and morally in the wrong because their management of the disputed allotments has been ideology based rather than fact and science based. And their management style is as always high handed authoritarian bureaucrapese that Americans are tired of. When the law becomes illegitimate in its methods and purposes, the citizens rebel.

94 posted on 04/13/2014 10:55:32 AM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

You may be right.

I’ve never been to law school and I’m not up to speed on the relevant cases.

However, I do think he’s going to have loads of hot lawyers on his side now, ready and willing to take on this case for the publicity alone (win OR lose), and that’ll certainly improve his chances.


95 posted on 04/13/2014 10:55:47 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Educate yourself.

https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42346.pdf


96 posted on 04/13/2014 10:57:04 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

“Show me the law that says the federal government owns that land.”

Will you have another?

http://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/crsreports/crsdocuments/RL34267_12032007.pdf


97 posted on 04/13/2014 11:04:54 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

That early video part was entertaining if not disgusting to watch. Somebody has to be regreting sending out the cityboy brownshirts with their dogs. It didn’t occur to the resident dumbass that all cowboys have dogs also, usually more than one. And a good cow dog is hell on coyotes. While I love german shepards those would have been no match for a couple of PO’d cowdogs who would have seen the shepards as coyotes most likely. That whole deal would have turned into a real rodeo if just a couple of cowdogs had showed up.

Speaking of dumbasses I noticed that the chick who runs the local BLM stayed under her desk until all the cows were turned loose. Looked like she was letting a BLM cityprick be the front guy so’s she could stay clean with the local folks——typical gummint “spread-the-blame” tactic.


98 posted on 04/13/2014 11:53:05 AM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12th_Monkey

I don’t know the details, but if he is illegally running cows on government land I personally do not care. The government lets illegal aliens flood into this country, gives them special treatment, taxpayer funded handouts that would stun people if they knew half what they get. Illegals damage the environment, have a big impact on wildlife on public lands every single day and the same government and non-government people that are “concerned” about cattle and turtles says nothing about the damage illegals do. The government says they cannot stop illegals from coming in, says we have to give them handouts, etc.

When this same government goes after a rancher that is not causing near the issues or costing near the money shows a real interest in stopping illegals then I might begin to have a concern about whether or not people are grazing cattle illegally on government land.

The politicians we have in charge now do not follow the law- they instead change it as we go along without even taking the proper steps to do it, flaunt it, bend it to suit them. What the issue really is here is many people have lost all respect for the politicians/government and are tired of having their freedoms taken away and seeing force used in ways that are not what this country is supposed to represent.

The first confrontation the government rent-a-cops and this ranching family was over the top. Can you imagine the outcry if anyone representing this government confronted a group of illegals in the same manner? You will never see that for sure.

The real lesson here is how many people are fed up with the government for so many different reasons. Early on someone said this was bigger than Bundy. They were so right.


99 posted on 04/13/2014 11:57:09 AM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

Imagine the outcry from liberals if the government met the cartel smugglers with the same attitude and force they went after Bundy with? We all know that would never happen. Special treatment for special groups, people are getting tired of giving up freedom and having illegals welcomed with open arms and unending handouts.


100 posted on 04/13/2014 12:01:52 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson