To: ponygirl
It’s also possible that the MSM is waiting for Rush to say something so they can go stark raving mad, or madder, and accuse him of supporting sedition or warmongering tea partiers. I think we might be seeing a subtle game of chess being played now regarding the coverage of this incident.
60 posted on
04/15/2014 9:38:02 AM PDT by
Enterprise
("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
To: Enterprise
Exactly. When he didn't say anything on Friday, I thought, "Maybe he's just waiting to see 1) how this shakes out; and 2) whether or not Bundy is actually legally in the right here." Then when he didn't say anything on Monday, I knew there was some other reason, probably to do with being blamed for sparking a very near violent episode (which is not yet over). He also knows the Obama Media was just waiting for his take on it all, so they could jump all over it.
I mean really... they're actually pulling out the War on Womyn crap with this whole Nevada thing. They're having a really tough time dealing with the "optics" of the iconic American cowboy facing off Obama's Police Force.
70 posted on
04/15/2014 9:44:50 AM PDT by
ponygirl
(Be Breitbart.)
To: Enterprise
Rush is often 24-48 hours behind the curve with breaking news. But his total avoidance of the Bundy/BLM story is so pointed and deliberate, there’s certainly more to it than him not being aware or informed. I’m very curious to know why the blackout, but we may never know why. It’s going to keep bugging me like a pebble in my shoe.
83 posted on
04/15/2014 10:01:00 AM PDT by
lonevoice
(We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson