Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lindsey Graham Uses Savvy, Experience to Deter Challenges
newsmax.com ^ | 4/23/14 | Sharon Churcher

Posted on 04/23/2014 8:12:32 AM PDT by cotton1706

When Sen. Lindsey Graham learned that the Tea Party planned to challenge his re-election bid this year, the South Carolina Republican set about outmaneuvering them, reports Politico.

The political veteran, who seldom has faced Republican opposition during two decades in Congress, prepped for what an aide called “Armageddon.” Graham enlisted an army of staff and volunteers — including some 5,200 precinct captains, amassed an $11.6 million war chest and blanketed the state with more than $1 million worth of ads promoting his work.

Graham also deterred the Tea Party’s favorite, conservative Rep. Mick Mulvaney, from running against him by demonstrating his power with the GOP leadership.

When Mulvaney wanted a seat on the House Financial Services Committee, Graham put in a word with his longtime friend, Speaker John Boehner, “to make it happen.” He also let Mulvaney and other potential rivals know that he had the means to help with their districts’ needs.

Mulvaney eventually decided not to take him on. “Not being able to win is a really good reason not to run,” he explained.

Politico says Graham also has brokered a deal with the state’s Tea Party-backed junior Sen. Tim Scott, who won’t risk annoying his supporters by endorsing Graham, but has agreed not to criticize him. “I have a primary — that’s where my focus is,” Scott said.

At the local level, Graham is offering his advice and money to inexperienced candidates.

Over the past twelve years, he has donated more than $150,000 to the South Carolina Republican Party through his campaign and political action committee. He says his approach is modelled after his predecessor, he late Sen. Strom Thurmond.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections
Slimy, insidious men cooperating with each other to protect the establishment.
1 posted on 04/23/2014 8:12:32 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Sad that South Carolina falls for this clown. If it was California and he was running for United States Senator, I would be more accepting, but one of the reddest states in the country? No way! You guys can do better.


2 posted on 04/23/2014 8:14:39 AM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Just like Mitchy, McLame and Bonehead.
If they worked this hard in Congress, they wouldn’t have to worry about loosing their jobs.


3 posted on 04/23/2014 8:15:00 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Sad that South Carolina falls for this clown. If it was California and he was running for United States Senator, I would be more accepting, but one of the reddest states in the country? No way! You guys can do better.

Hey Maryland, the primary is June 10th with a possible run-off three weeks later. Can you hold off lambasting us until then? Please and thank you.
4 posted on 04/23/2014 8:49:54 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

How do they separate the men in Lindsey Graham’s office? With a crow bar.


5 posted on 04/23/2014 9:09:19 AM PDT by aimhigh (John 14:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
...one of the reddest states in the country...

And "red" lately has come to represent "Republican" but not necessarily "Constitutional conservative". Although there are a healthy bunch of conservatives in the Upstate...thankfully.
6 posted on 04/23/2014 9:39:53 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Hey Maryland, the primary is June 10th with a possible run-off three weeks later. Can you hold off lambasting us until then? Please and thank you.

Ok. I will. However, this is not Lindsey’s first rodeo. Best of luck to you South Carolina folks.


7 posted on 04/23/2014 11:30:31 AM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
However, this is not Lindsey’s first rodeo.

Naps, if I were to put forward the notion that Graham's re-election in 2008 was ONLY an unintended consequence of Sarah Palin running as the Republican VP nominee, what would you say?
8 posted on 04/23/2014 11:59:48 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Just my thought. If some of these guys applied the same effort to doing what they were elected for as they do to getting re-elected they wouldn’t have to expend so much effort & money.


9 posted on 04/23/2014 3:51:43 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

I understand what you are implying, but I remember vividly the primary which had nothing to do with Sarah.....Lindsey won overwhelmingly and was the nominee.


10 posted on 04/23/2014 5:09:07 PM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
I understand what you are implying, but I remember vividly the primary which had nothing to do with Sarah.....Lindsey won overwhelmingly and was the nominee.

That is what happened.

I didn't intend to poke a jab at you. In fact, mine was a good-natured post to you that I actually kinduv sortuv believe and no one can disprove. Apology that my idea was expressed poorly.
11 posted on 04/23/2014 5:16:23 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

No biggie.....Have a good one. Are you watching “The Middle”? I just love this show! That is the only show I watch on Wednesday night. I used to watch Survivor but haven’t in a few years.


12 posted on 04/23/2014 5:18:58 PM PDT by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

That would be a negative to the TV show.


13 posted on 04/23/2014 5:23:04 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson