Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There's no Plan B for Obama's Foreign Policy(Who expected anything different?)
Townhall.com ^ | April 25, 2014 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 04/25/2014 4:11:33 AM PDT by Kaslin

I think we all know what Barack Obama's foreign policy strategy coming into office was.

Step 1: Be Barack Obama (and not George W. Bush).

Step 2: ????

Step 3: World peace!

(With apologies to "South Park.")

As a candidate, Obama held a huge campaign rally in, of all places, Berlin, touting his bona fides as a citizen of the world. The crowds went wild, as he talked at length about a world without walls (you had to be there). As president, in his first major speech abroad, Obama suggested to a Cairo audience that the fact America elected him was all the proof anyone should need that America had turned the page.

It all seems very strange now in retrospect, but in his defense, you can understand how seductive this notion must have been. The whole world -- at least the parts of it that Obama listens to -- was telling him that replacing George W. Bush with Barack Obama was just the ticket for what ailed the planet. The fervor was all so detached from facts on the ground that the Nobel Committee even gave Obama a Peace Prize for the stuff they were sure he was going to do, eventually. (One clue that Obama's cult of personality didn't actually translate into tangible results on the world stage should have been his failure to win the 2016 Olympics for his hometown of Chicago, despite being the first president to personally lobby for it.)

The problem, of course, is that Obama never had a Plan B. He never really thought he'd need one, and besides, he never much cared about foreign policy. Particularly in his first term, his top priority was to keep international problems from distracting his domestic agenda. He ordered the surge in Afghanistan but then went silent about that war for years. He passive-aggressively let a status of forces agreement with Iraq evaporate. Even his controversial policies -- targeted killing, drones, etc. -- were intended to turn the war on terrorism into a no-drama technocratic affair out of the headlines.

And the killing of Osama Bin Laden, his greatest foreign policy accomplishment (I'm using "his" advisedly), was almost immediately translated into an argument about domestic priorities.

"We obviously think that if there is a takeaway from it," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney explained in the immediate aftermath of bin Laden's assassination, "it is the resolve [Obama] has, the focus he brings to bear on long-term objectives, that he keeps pushing to get it done. On immigration reform he keeps pushing ..." Blah, blah, blah. For a verbal pirouette, Carney's segue had all the subtlety of Chris Farley in a tutu.

The real takeaway from such statements, and from Obama's whole approach to foreign policy, is that he doesn't care about it, or he's afraid of it. He issued a red line in Syria until his bluff was called. He's let our ally, the Philippines, fend for itself as China tries to annex Scarborough Shoal. He's made it clear to the Iranians that he considers talking its own reward, since that will likely kick the hard decision about their nuclear program onto the next president's desk. When Vladimir Putin began his invasion and annexation of Crimea, Obama mumbled a soft denunciation and then hustled downtown to a DNC rally, telling the crowd, "Well, it's Friday, it's after 5:00. So this is officially happy hour with the Democratic Party."

Such things are noticed. This is the foreign policy equivalent of being an ugly American. President Obama is in Japan to assure the increasingly nervous Japanese that we will honor our commitments to them, even as the Chinese become ever more brazen about filling the vacuum America is leaving behind. This is worthwhile. So is his tardy decision to reassure our increasingly nervous NATO allies in Poland and three Baltic states by sending some token troops for an exercise.

But while these are good and necessary gestures, they are necessary in no small part because it is only now dawning on the president he should have had a Plan B all along.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: foreignpolicy

1 posted on 04/25/2014 4:11:33 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
 photo menfr_zps843fa60f.jpg

2 posted on 04/25/2014 4:14:00 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There was a ‘Plan A’?


3 posted on 04/25/2014 4:18:38 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

—— he’s afraid of it——

Plus, he is very narrowly or perhaps uneducated in matters above street level.

He is in short, ignorant. The world laughs at his naivete.


4 posted on 04/25/2014 4:19:43 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

You said it


5 posted on 04/25/2014 4:24:40 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Should be no surprise there was no “B” plan as with O’Bimbo there is NEVER “A plan” other than to weaken America and pander to the commies & moose-limbs. What a freakin’ disgrace on the status of the American society that would elect him in the first place. (Let alone re-elect this un-American hood rat)


6 posted on 04/25/2014 4:25:42 AM PDT by Fighter@heart (The government cares NOT 1 iota about your health, only about your WEALTH!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

“Plan B” is available OTC. This alleged foreign policy needs to be aborted.


7 posted on 04/25/2014 4:47:13 AM PDT by Artie (We are surrounded by MORONS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I thought Plan B, was to blame it on Bush.
8 posted on 04/25/2014 4:50:05 AM PDT by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
RE :”Step 1: Be Barack Obama (and not George W. Bush).
Step 2: ????
Step 3: World peace! “

An that note, I remember back in 2009 or 2010 some libs on MSNBC I think saying that Obama’s words ALONE could end (others) wars because of his ‘moral authority’.

Yet he hadn't accomplished anything except that Peace Prize he got for being black.

9 posted on 04/25/2014 5:24:49 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : 'You can keep your doctor if you want. I never tell a lie ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"No plan B"?

Guess he was born to sing.

FMCDH(BITS)

10 posted on 04/25/2014 6:14:01 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In order to have a Plan B, one would have to be willing to concede that one might just possibly be wrong.

Obama does not have that in him.


11 posted on 04/25/2014 6:22:11 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Plan B? Hell, they ain’t even got a PLAN A!.....................


12 posted on 04/25/2014 6:22:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
They were using Plan 9 From Outer Space.....................
13 posted on 04/25/2014 6:23:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But, obviously, there is a plan " BS ".
14 posted on 04/25/2014 6:40:22 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Maybe this is true of all post-Vietnam War Democratic Presidents. Bill Clinton didn't want to pay attention to foreign policy--he was finally moved to have the Dayton Peace Conference to avoid having the ongoing war in the former Yugoslavia from being a campaign issue in 1996. He bombed Serbia in 1999 to avoid having to use US troops who might get killed.

Carter is known for his efforts in the Middle East (Camp David and all that) but I think he was dragged into it by Sadat's surprise visit to Jerusalem.

15 posted on 04/25/2014 8:55:21 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

I think plan “A” was wing-it...


16 posted on 04/25/2014 11:35:08 AM PDT by El Laton Caliente (NRA Life Member & www.Gunsnet.net Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente

Their “plan” is to weaken America.


17 posted on 04/25/2014 11:35:45 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson