You are trying to put words in my mouth that I didn't say. I am not excusing Russian( you do know Stalin is dead, don't you?) media. I am saying you can't trust theirs or ours.
And why do you prefer Stalin’s propaganda?
I don't. I prefer the one that is telling the truth, at the time. Sometimes it is ours and sometimes it is theirs.
The burden of proof for Moscow’s claims is on them and their apologists, not us.
I agree. But maybe you should read this.
Romanian military units moving towards Ukrainian border
Granted, it's still a Russian source, but they are quoting Romanian officials.
You didn't answer my question, though. What IF it were true that we had some kind of military 'advisers' on the ground in that area ?
A worthless point then. You might as well say "water is wet," but our media is actually freer and larger than the Russian versions, which are entirely under threat of Kremlin violence. A person can double check Rather's reporting, report it on a blog, or go on Fox News. Consequently it's harder for them to lie as outrageously as the Russian controlled media can. (By the way, did you know that RT recently had on a woman as a legitimate source, unknown to the viewers, who also asserts that the Vatican is under control of alien forces and that they're hording all the gold?) So your point is not only a red herring, it is an exaggeration.
You didn't answer my question, though. What IF it were true that we had some kind of military 'advisers' on the ground in that area ?
Why would I answer a stupid question like this? How about this question instead: Let us assume that Putin is a Nazi, what method do you think is the best to get rid of him? These speculative questions I prefer a great deal more.