Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Church of Christ sues over NC ban on same-sex marriage
Charlotte Observer ^ | 04/28/2014 | Michael Gordon

Posted on 04/28/2014 10:29:12 AM PDT by GIdget2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: GIdget2004

If them, why shouldn’t Moslems be able to practice polygamy?


41 posted on 04/28/2014 11:35:50 AM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

NO, no GAY MARRIAGE in NC. (Do not mess with my state), but how cute that they are trying!


42 posted on 04/28/2014 11:44:40 AM PDT by JSDude1 (Defeat Hagan, elect a Constutional Conservative: Dr. Greg Brannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Yes, it is. It is a “church” in name only, but does accurately reflect 0bama’s values.


43 posted on 04/28/2014 11:45:45 AM PDT by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

“They say state prohibitions, including a constitutional amendment passed by voters in 2012, violate their First Amendment right of freedom of religion.”

These alleged Christian clergy do not understand the First Amendment and Freedom of Religion.

The entire concept of the First Amendment in a Christian nation is to protect their freedom of religion and not have that freedom corrupted by the state by forcing churches to go against the Bible.


44 posted on 04/28/2014 11:48:53 AM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

There’s nothing at all stopping any of those “churches” from marrying whoever or whatever they want.


45 posted on 04/28/2014 11:54:40 AM PDT by Blackyce (French President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blackyce
"There’s nothing at all stopping any of those “churches” from marrying whoever or whatever they want."

The Bible and the First Amendment should be enough to stop them.

46 posted on 04/28/2014 11:58:40 AM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: john316
There is no relationship whatsoever between the United Church of Christ and the churches of Christ. Most of the latter use a small 'c' as one means of distinguishing between them. The church of Christ has its roots in the Stone-Campbell restoration movement and is very Conservative, both theologically and politically.

As a contrast, some of the better known members of the United Church of Christ include Howard Dean, Julian Bond, Jim Jeffords and Jon Corzine. Compare that to prominent church of Christ members including Ken Starr (recently converted to Baptist as president of Baylor), Ted Poe, Fred Thompson and, surprisingly, Meat Loaf.

47 posted on 04/28/2014 12:08:26 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

a desecration of the altar which destroys its true purpose. Just so will Antichrist establish an abomination in the sanctuary, a demonic counterfeit worship


48 posted on 04/28/2014 12:10:02 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: henkster

I am not a lawyer but I enjoy reading the way judges take apart these garbage arguments. But with the courts the way the are now they’ll probably win.


49 posted on 04/28/2014 12:13:11 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Exactly right. All word play with them to get unspoken consent of all.


50 posted on 04/28/2014 12:13:52 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: john316
Sure don’t sound like any Church of Christ I’ve ever been to. Sure ain’t the Pottsville,KY CoC.

Is this the same Church of Christ that used to not use live music in their Services, and put out little "anti-dancing" tracts? One I saw said, "The passions aroused on the dance floor are often fulfilled after the ball."

Wow, if it's the same Church of Chrst.

51 posted on 04/28/2014 1:34:47 PM PDT by sockmonkey (Of Course I didn't read the article. After all, this is FreeRepublic..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004; P-Marlowe

The article lies. Church of Christ ministers are not required for a marriage to be legal. Legal weddings are performed hourly throughout that state without Church of Christ ministers being anywhere nearby.

In other words, they are superfluous to any legal wedding. Absolutely unnecessary.

And, like others have pointed out, these ministers can perform all the wedding ceremonies they want. No one is stopping them.


52 posted on 04/28/2014 2:17:09 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

“United Church of Christ” is a communist front organization.


53 posted on 04/28/2014 2:21:02 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Can’t the clergy still perform these marriages?

No - Performing marriages without a valid marriage license is illegal in North Carolina -

"No minister, officer, or any other person authorized to solemnize a marriage under the laws of this State shall perform a ceremony of marriage between a man and woman, or shall declare them to be husband and wife, until there is delivered to that person a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage license was issued or by a lawful deputy or assistant."
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByChapter/Chapter_51.pdf
54 posted on 04/30/2014 4:55:11 AM PDT by Michamilton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
BS they can perform “marriages” all they want, they just can’t make them legal.

No - Performing marriages without a valid marriage license is illegal in North Carolina -

"No minister, officer, or any other person authorized to solemnize a marriage under the laws of this State shall perform a ceremony of marriage between a man and woman, or shall declare them to be husband and wife, until there is delivered to that person a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage license was issued or by a lawful deputy or assistant."
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByChapter/Chapter_51.pdf
55 posted on 04/30/2014 4:56:00 AM PDT by Michamilton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed
Nothing is stopping them from marrying whoever they deem suitable for marriage.

No - Performing marriages without a valid marriage license is illegal in North Carolina -

"No minister, officer, or any other person authorized to solemnize a marriage under the laws of this State shall perform a ceremony of marriage between a man and woman, or shall declare them to be husband and wife, until there is delivered to that person a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage license was issued or by a lawful deputy or assistant."
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByChapter/Chapter_51.pdf
56 posted on 04/30/2014 4:57:18 AM PDT by Michamilton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
State and federal laws against homosexual “marriage” don't affect religious practice whatsoever...nor should they.Religious denominations are free,and should be free (in the eyes of the law),to declare any number of creatures of any gender or species to be “married” in the eyes of their “God”.

Well - Performing marriages without a valid marriage license is illegal in North Carolina.

"No minister, officer, or any other person authorized to solemnize a marriage under the laws of this State shall perform a ceremony of marriage between a man and woman, or shall declare them to be husband and wife, until there is delivered to that person a license for the marriage of the said persons, signed by the register of deeds of the county in which the marriage license was issued or by a lawful deputy or assistant."
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/PDF/ByChapter/Chapter_51.pdf
57 posted on 04/30/2014 4:59:09 AM PDT by Michamilton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Michamilton

Sounds like an unconstitutional state law to me.


58 posted on 04/30/2014 4:59:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Michamilton
Well - Performing marriages without a valid marriage license is illegal in North Carolina.

Understood.But I'm addressing "marriage" as it would be described by a religious denomination.The Episcopalians (for example) are free,and should be free,to declare any two (or more) creatures to be "married" in the eyes of their "God".But to perform a "marriage" that's recognized by the government,for the purposes of filing a joint tax return (for example) certain requirements must be met...as you've noted.

59 posted on 04/30/2014 6:06:08 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Michamilton

I think most states have laws like that, don’t they? I know more than just NC has it. My point was that if a state refuses to issue a license for people of a certain faith, there are many faiths that would simply break those laws. The alternative would be no one ever gets married in the faith. So far it has never been put to the test on a wide scale. Those laws get brought up occasionally when older widowed couples wish to be married in the faith but not to tell the state so as not to have their pensions and benefits altered.

For instance, if a state quit issuing marriage licenses to those faiths that didn’t accept civil divorce and remarriages or ‘gay marriage’ the groups that haven’t accepted civil divorce and remarriage or ‘gay marriage’ would have to drop being involved in civil marriage at all, they would have no choice. They would just have to break the law and take the consequences. Here’s an article that talks about the Catholic Church dropping civil involvement in the US.

http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2012/11/the-crisis-of-a-second-obama-administration

Freegards


60 posted on 04/30/2014 6:26:33 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson