Posted on 04/28/2014 12:33:37 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
The Department of Energy is looking to regulate two types of household lamps.
The Energy Department's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy announced Monday in the Federal Register it is considering new energy conservation standards for general service fluorescent lamps (GSFLs) and incandescent reflector lamps (IRLs).
The Energy Department estimates the rules will save the public billions in energy bills over the next three decades and have substantial environmental benefits. But the agency also expects the rules will cost manufacturers more than $90 million, which could lead some to close up shop and cut jobs. It is weighing the costs with the benefits.
"The (Energy Policy and Conservation Act) requires the U.S. Department of Energy to determine whether more-stringent, amended standards would be technologically feasible and economically justified, and would save a significant amount of energy," the agency wrote.
This is the Energy Department's latest effort to reform the lighting industry. In January, the agency began enforcing new rules that effectively ban the most popular type of incandescent light bulbs, which Thomas Edison made famous in the late 1800s.
The proposed rules would apply to general service fluorescent lamps and incandescent reflector lamps, which fall under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
They would establish more stringent requirements for these types of lamps.
The incandescent reflector lamps would be the most affected by the new rules. The agency estimates the industry could lose nearly 30 percent of its value, or about $52 million, because of the rules.
"Additionally, manufacturers of IRLs stated in interviews with (the Energy Department) that there is the potential for IRL manufacturers to close existing U.S. manufacturing plants or for a potential loss of domestic IRL manufacturing employment based on the energy conservation standards proposed for IRLs," the agency wrote.
The general service fluorescent lamps are more widely circulated, so the rules are not expected to have as big of an impact on this industry and no job losses are anticipated. But the industry could still lose nearly $40 million, the agency estimates.
On the flip side, the proposed standards for the general service fluorescent lamps would save consumers between $3.1 billion and $8.1 billion, while the incandescent reflector lamps rules would save the public between $180 million and $280 million, the agency estimates.
Furthermore, the rules would have significant environmental benefits. Carbon dioxide reductions from the GSFL standards would save the government between $1.3 billion and $17 billion, the agency estimates.
The Energy Department will hold a public hearing on Thursday to discuss the proposed rules. The public has 60 days to comment.
I have solar. They’re planning on taxing it!
If you get my drift. :-)
When will they MADATE cars run on air? Just before then deem Oxygen a pollutant.
Yup.
Will we ever see a smaller fedgov in our lives? Will it never end?
The first ecological disaster on earth was when green plants polluted the Earth’s atmosphere and wiped out nearly all other life with that deadly poison, oxygen.
I’m in Maryland...they tax rain here.
“The Energy Department estimates the rules will save the public billions in energy bills over the next three decades...”
In other words, Obama wants to deny American utility companies $3 billion in revenue.
They are never going to leave us alone. They live and breathe totalitarian control. Nothing but blood and steel will stop them.
Assume that there might be people who stockpiled a lifetime supply of 100 watters. Will those people now have to stockpile lamps that will let them shine?
What about Toilets? We need toilet regulation now!!
as if free enterprise was highly over rated
Well, you know, first they have to pass the law. Then they have to establish some new department and about 15 new agencies to figure out how to enforce the law. Then those agencies will need “field” people to check all the retailers to be sure they are not carrying illicit lamps, and then they will need some inspectors to go house to house, to be sure we are not using illicit lamps, then there will be people needed write the computer programs needed to keep track of all of this. You cannot expect these things to be free, can you? (/s)
I find those terms acceptable. </Edgar the Bug>
*ahem* Senator Al Gore did that.
Most of Congress is a pantload. There in is the problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.