Posted on 04/29/2014 6:30:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
Those who think Sterling is just going to roll over for them are in for a rude surprise. The dude’s 80 YO, is worth billions, and the ego to go with all that cash.
Does anyone else wonder if it isn’t just a coincidence that this disturbing racial diatribe gets released just as Obama, Holder and the Democrat establishment is doing everything in their power to stir up racial unrest, most likely to motivate black voters for the midterms?
Holder is commissioning one study after the other on “disparate impact” and openly accusing congress of racism - this fits right in to that narrative.
It sure didn’t take Obama long to weigh in on Sterling’s comments.
“Why isn’t she being prosecuted for this recording? In California both parties must agree to recording before it can be legally done.”
She and TMZ both claim that he knew he was being recorded, and when you hear the full recording, it’s clear he knew. I don’t know if that’s true or if we’ll ever hear evidence, but that’s what is being ‘reported’.
Sorry, I disagree. Truman was a decent person. Not perfect.
Just like you.
Yep, its seems a bit extreme.....
to crucify this clown for what he believed was a private conversation......
and what she did in recording him is outright illegal to do here in Maryland......
But considering that his behavior was so seedy, associating with someone like her in the first place, and buying her expensive gifts and $$$,(while being married) and the planned NAACP Lifetime Achievement award ( this part is really funny, really!!), its impossible to sympathize with him at all.
I hope he puts up a fight and goes out swinging....for entertainment..keep MSNBC busy....I never watched basket-ball anyway.
Liberals claim they are all about tolerance, acceptance, diversity. Yet here we have a guy that doesn't follow the liberal PC agenda. Look how "tolerant" and "accepting" liberals are. How much are they "celebrating his diversity" from them? Yeah, not so much. In fact they are working overtime to vilify and destroy him. {expletive} hypocrites.
The single greatest threat to true freedom and liberty is the so-called liberal.
Geeze, it’s getting more and more like the old Soviet Union.
“In Obama’s America - television watches YOU!”
Well, I guess this old f*rt isn’t convinced that’s racist. I mean, substitute ‘homosexuals’ where the word blacks is found and it is clear the man doesn’t want to be used to promote a social engineering agenda. That the New Yuck Slimes twist that into racism is just more proof the media whoredom are being obedient and pimping yet another faux crisis in order to keep anyone from seeing the evil in our midst destroying America behind a curtain of media promoted deception.
Nothing, since about 2000.
There is no 'private'.
add “...for only so long.” to the end of the last sentence.
The act itself is criminal in California.
Or recording. All of this smacks of a police state and I fear we are headed in that direction. Surreptitiously recording a person's private conversations is an assault on individual liberty and free speech.
I lived two years in a communist country. What is happening here is very similar to how the communists were able to control and intimidate free expression. Any anti-government remarks in private or in public were subject to retribution. Children were encourage to report on their parents.
NSA has shown that we have the technical means to invade the private domain of speech and written correspondence. How far will we go in this realm? And can we just dismiss any protection of our free right of expression if the targeted individual is privately a bigot or racist?
you would be welcome to them
If so, he was very foolish. Or arrogant to the point of foolishness.
I take it you are in favor of prosecuting James O'Keefe for his videos of government crooks and Lila Rose who videotapes the abortion facilities?
Should only the government be allowed to secretly tape your conversations?
Comments on most general matters of “interest” which I have uttered in private has been communicated in one way or another right here on Free Republic
I suspect that were I a “sort of” public figure”....[ and wealthy enough to be quoted that Barack Hussein Mohammed Obama would have called for my head on a spike many moons ago.
we truly seem to be entering the new dark ages
you should write a book on those parralels- show how what we are seeing now is the same as what you saw then
“The little I ask you is not to promote it on that”
What is “it? What is “that”? What was she “promoting”? Curious choice of words. Promoting something using “race”? Not approving of using race for a promotion wouldn’t necessarily be racist.
This sentence is “context” to his so-called racist remarks.
Without understanding what he meant by this statement, I can’t determine how racist, if at all, his comments were. Why can everyone one else do so?
I sense he was TRYING to be FUNNY but I could be mistaken
I would be soooo SCREWED if everything I said in private was made public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.