Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sterling’s racism is ugly, but the loss of privacy will be even worse
Boston Globe ^ | 4/30/14 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 04/30/2014 3:17:10 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

A FEW thoughts on the Donald Sterling scandal....

....My sympathy for Sterling is nonexistent. His racist remarks are odious, and they couldn’t have come as a shock to anyone who has followed his career. Yet the most alarming part of this story has less to do with basketball or the racial prejudices of an 80-year-old plutocrat than with what it says about the rapidly disappearing presumption that things we say in our personal lives will stay personal.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonglobe.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fascism; freedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
A few voices of sanity are getting through.....
1 posted on 04/30/2014 3:17:10 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I wouldn't even criticize his remarks. People have different opinions about lots of things. Forcing everyone to like a particular thing is just tyranny. I want freedom. And that means if someone dislikes something (ex. Jazz, Modern Art, sushi, whatever) then it's no big deal.

Sterling has his own preferences.

I don't care. At all.

2 posted on 04/30/2014 3:19:51 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Can one reasonably expect privacy when dealing with a prostitute? One already knows that she will sell anything that she can.


3 posted on 04/30/2014 3:22:42 AM PDT by iowamark (I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>> His racist remarks are odious,

Yawn... private remarks... let’s review everyone’s private remarks to establish a baseline...


4 posted on 04/30/2014 3:26:57 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Same here. I don’t care. At all.
I prefer vanilla ice cream, not chocolate. Am I a bigot?


5 posted on 04/30/2014 3:46:56 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
If you really want to get disgusted, click on the link to the Globe and read the comments. It seems like the liberals in Boston have no issues with losing ones privacy. In fact the over riding sentiment is that there is NO right to privacy if you go against certain core beliefs that libs hold near and dear.

don't believe me? Then click on the link and read for yourselves. I am sure most people here will find the comments chilling

6 posted on 04/30/2014 3:49:21 AM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (Is it too late to save the country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I just listened to the conversation to see what all the hoopla was about. I was expecting vile and degrading remarks about blacks, after hearing what the punishment was for this guy.

Unless I was listening to something else, I thought the old man was more concerned about the image it created when his way-too-young “girlfriend” was cavorting with very fit, physical younger-than-him black men.

Let’s be blunt - I am over sixty and when I was growing up, when you saw a white woman with a black man, the rumor was (at least back then) that she was in it because the sex was better. Sorry, but that’s what was said.

Unless he has other issues in his past as being racist, he didn’t seem to personally have any hate for blacks, at least by what I listened to.

In any case, it was a private conversation, or so he thought. He really didn’t sound that hateful. Just old, tired, and not politically correct.


7 posted on 04/30/2014 3:50:54 AM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

huh?


8 posted on 04/30/2014 3:52:30 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

You’re correct.


9 posted on 04/30/2014 3:53:10 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

He and his girlfriend were having an argument. She wanted to have it both ways, his money and her boyfriends on the side. How would you feel? His girlfriend set him up and he was dumb enough to fall in the trap.


10 posted on 04/30/2014 3:55:03 AM PDT by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Humphrey

I’ve run into that on other message boards and social media sites too. Too many people have be raised under the umbrella of freedom and have no experience with the horrors of Fascism and communism. They never saw the movies of people being shot in the back escaping East Germany, getting hooked out of the water off the shores of Cuba only to have their dead bodies pushed back in. They have no idea because those that lived through it and those that fought against it are dying off and never really want to relive the hell by recounting it for the history books. To them Cuba isn’t all that bad, NoKo’s Kim is just a funny looking guy that likes to boss people around, watch basketball and has strange haircut.


11 posted on 04/30/2014 3:57:06 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

He explicitly had no problems with her seeing other men, so long as it was private. He didn’t like her associating with these oversexed studs, likely because he felt that humiliated him.


12 posted on 04/30/2014 3:58:09 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Looking at the bigger picture, anybody with Internet access has pretty much forfeited their privacy already. Whatever you post on social media today (and that includes Free Republic) will stay with you the rest of your life. If you are a 20 year old and you run for public office in the future, your entire posting history will be accessible by your opponents.

Hiding behind a screen name won't help you much either. At some point, our screen names will be mapped to our real names. Bank on it. For our web surfing activity is creating a "digital signature" that will be unique to each one of us and from that database, our real identities will be known.

Couple that with the growing number of surveillance cameras and other such technology. Eventually, all our public activity will be recorded and searchable as we will be able to go nowhere public without being recorded.

13 posted on 04/30/2014 4:02:39 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

The Clipper players are in for a rude surprise if Sterling doesn’t sell and it ends up for years in litigation, as they will be hurt the most out of this fiasco. Monetarily, and draft-wise. I’m sure most of them aren’t eager to have to move somewhere else and I’m sure most of them don’t want to have to sell their homes. Instead of warm LA, they might end up in cold Chicago, lol.

Plus their salaries somewhere else might be less than what they are being paid now. Plus their wives, if married, aren’t going to like being uprooted, kids having to change schools and lose their friends. All this will happen if the NBA decides to try to punish Sterling by making the players free agents, free to leave for other teams, or making the Sterling franchise lose money and AD sponsors.

Then there is the NAACP. Donald Sterling gave lots of money to the NAACP. He won’t be doing that anymore, IMO. So they will lose lots of bucks from Sterling’s contributions. If Sterling ever did decide to sell the team, he’d make a huge profit, huge. So the only losers here will be the players, their families, and the NAACP. Sometimes the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know.


14 posted on 04/30/2014 4:03:49 AM PDT by flaglady47 (Oppressors can tyranize only w/a standing army-enslaved press-disarmed populace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: SoFloFreeper
It's a travesty how many people are willing, even eager, to forego freedom, liberty, and privacy in the name of political correctness.

A direct result of a nation that has turned it's back on God.

16 posted on 04/30/2014 4:05:24 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“Yet the most alarming part of this story has less to do with basketball or the racial prejudices of an 80-year-old plutocrat than with what it says about the rapidly disappearing presumption that things we say in our personal lives will stay personal.”

TOTALLY CORRECT.


17 posted on 04/30/2014 4:05:55 AM PDT by ZULU (Devil Patrick FREE Justina Pelletier!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
If the man didn't know he was being recorded, then the ramblings of an old man said in private should not be used against him!
If, as the wh*re claims, he asked to be recorded because of dementia, all the worse as far as I am concerned! The wh*re knew of his physical state and took advantage of him and his private thoughts.
I was under the assumption that in the state of CA, both parties had to be aware of being recorded so the claim that both knew they were being recorded, clears her. But, if the reason both knew of the recording is because of his dementia, then that physical condition comes into play as far as his mental state and his statements should not be used against him!
18 posted on 04/30/2014 4:09:00 AM PDT by 4everontheRight (And the story began with..."Once there was a great nation......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I see this less as ‘disciplinary action’ than as the economic decision of the other owners. They are in the business of selling a non-essential good. Their entire business model is built on people having positive associations with their brand. They are dependent on people buying tickets, and on companies creating a myriad of cross-endorsement deals for everything from beer to shoes.

There are many worse ‘crimes’ than what Stirling, but it’s hard to conceive of anything Stirling could have said or done that did more harm to their business model. The value of the San Diego Clippers, in Stirling’s hands, is now zero. He will get several hundred million dollars for selling the franchise because it is worth that much in the hands of another owner. But the other owners, through the commissioner are telling him he has to sell because he is damaging the value of their franchises as well.

This isn’t a judicial proceeding. The NBA is a voluntary economic parternship among the franchise owners. He knew that when he decided to buy a franchise. And what he said, though said in private and not illegal, damaged the value of the other owner’s franchises and they acted accordingly.


19 posted on 04/30/2014 4:10:20 AM PDT by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

...”A few voices of sanity are getting through”.....

Yes. I believe Americans of all races are going to conclude that our first amendment rights are more important than the political correctness being used against an obviously immoral, in my view, old man, who is probably experiencing some form of dementia. The girlfriend should go to jail, whether or not she was part of a plot to steal his team from him, as was suggested yesterday on Rush. This kind of political intrigue is dangerous for all of us..Do not let this happen, people. If this man is no longer capable of running his business, then his family should make the decisions. His property should not be confiscated from him because of his psychology or his speech. Anything else means that no one is safe under a now despotic system which is unconstitutional.


20 posted on 04/30/2014 4:10:29 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson