Skip to comments.Bill Clinton: 'I Thank God Every April 15th' I Get to Pay More Taxes
Posted on 04/30/2014 1:07:48 PM PDT by NoLibZone
"Hillary and I and some of our friends in this audience who live in New York probably pay the highest aggregate tax rates in America, and I thank God every April 15th that Im able to do it, Clinton said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Stay here at FR and avoid the Daily Kos Trolls that have taken over at breitbart.com
FR is the place to stay and chat!
Louder, dumbsh*t. Don’t you know your wife wants to be president?
While Breitbart is good news source, It’s useless as a place for discussions.
Stay here at FR and avoid the Daily Kos Trolls that have taken over at breitbart.com
FR is the place to stay and chat!
I know what he means. He means that he can afford them because he makes a nice living. However, it is still bad form to brag about paying taxes especially since he is in the top 10 percent.
I seriously doubt that Klinton ever prays.
Entire life in politics, never a day of honest work. Ends up a fabulously wealthy Multi-millionaire. Got it.
What with Hillary’s recently teaching Jesus what He really meant about “No, You feed them”, and now Bill’s statement, I think it’s unwise to stand near either one of them for a good long while.
The Great Prevaricator strikes again. His tax-exempt “charity” pays for his billionaire lifestyle - nothing comes out of Bubba’s pocket.
So he LIKES being told what to do......no wonder he married Hillary
...said nobody ever...
Says the guy who famously claimed write-offs for his used socks and underwear.
Then pay more BILL CLINTON! No one is stopping you!
Yeah..the elite don’t care..they can afford it! Low lifes.
re: “. . .and I thank God every April 15th that Im able to do it, Clinton said.
So, I guess that means he never takes any deductions, right? He wants to pay as much as possible in taxes, right?
1) Clintons own words show his often expressed innate hostility to, and utter contempt for, the core principles of the American founding:
``If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the governments ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees. -- President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993
``The purpose of government is to reign in the rights of the people - Bill Clinton during an interview on MTV in 1993
``We cant be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans that we forget about reality. -- President Bill Clinton, quoted in USA Today, March 11, 1993, Page 2A, ``NRA change: `Omnipotent to powerful by Debbie Howlett
When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly that they would work for the common good, as well as for the individual welfare However, now theres a lot of irresponsibility. And so a lot of people say theres too much freedom. When personal freedoms being abused, you have to move to limit it. Bill Clinton, April 19, 1995
2) Clinton inevitably pursued his own political advantage at the expense of American interests and national security. Here is just one of many possible examples:
It is well documented that Clinton and the Democrats took illegal campaign money from groups and individuals tied directly to the Chinese Peoples Republican Army. It is therefore not surprising that In January 1998 Clinton went against the advice of then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher and Pentagon experts by lifting long-standing restrictions against the export of American satellites to China for launch on Chinese rockets. Not only did he move control over such decisions from the more security-focused State Department to the Commerce Department, but he intervened in a Justice Department investigation of Loral Space & Communications, retroactively enabling Loral to sell critical missile technology to the Chinese. Interestingly enough, Clintons decision was made at the request of Loral CEO Bernard Schwartz, whose earlier $1.3 million campaign donation made him the single biggest contributor to the Democratic election effort.
The result, as stated eloquently by syndicated columnist Linda Bowles, was that the Democrats got money from satellite companies and from Chinese communists; China got supercomputors, advanced production equipment and missile technology; Loral got its satellites launched at bargain basement prices . . . and the transfer of sensitive missile technology gave China [for the first time] the capability of depositing bombs on American cities. Incidentally, Loral ultimately failed to benefit from this permanent injury to Americas security interests: in July 2003, the company filed for bankruptcy protection, and in order to raise cash was forced to sell its most profitable business a fleet of communications satellites orbiting over North America.
3) On two occasions, Clinton used military action for the specific purpose of distracting the American public from the fallout of the Lewinsky affair:
On August 20, three days after Clinton finally admitted publicly to the Lewinsky affair, the news media was poised to focus on that days grand jury testimony by Monica Lewinsky. That same morning, Clinton personally went on national television to gravely announce his bombing of a Sudanese chemical weapons factory, and a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. It was the first time most Americans ever heard the name of Osama bin Laden. The factory bombing in Sudan killed an innocent night watchman, but accomplished little else. It later was proven that the plant was making badly needed pharmaceuticals for people in that poverty-stricken part of the world, but no chemical weapons.
Several months later, the U.S. Center for Nonproliferation Studies, part of the Monterey Institute of International Studies, stated: "...the evidence indicates that the facility had no role whatsoever in chemical weapons development." Kroll Associates, one of the world's most reputable investigative firms, also confirmed that there was no link in any way between the plant and any terrorist organization. As for the Afghanistan bombing, it failed to do any damage at all to bin Laden or his organization. Clintons action was accurately characterized by George W. Bush when he said right after 9-11: "When I take action, Im not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt.
Clintons pointless and murderous military actions did not make Americans safer that day, although they did destroy an innocent life, and for all the good they did certainly could have been delayed in any case. But they did succeed in diverting media attention from Lewinskys grand jury testimony for a 24-hour news cycle, which was the main point. So I guess, they werent a total loss.
On December 16, 1998, on the eve of the scheduled House vote on his impeachment, Bill Clinton launched a surprise bombing attack on Baghdad. As justification for this exploit, he cited the urgent threat that Saddams weapons of mass destruction posed to America, and the need for immediate action. Almost immediately, the House Democrats held a caucus and emerged calling for a delay in the impeachment proceedings. House minority leader Dick Gephardt made a statement: "We obviously should pass a resolution by saying that we stand behind the troops. I would hope that we do not take up impeachment until the hostilities have completely ended."
Conveniently, a delay so near the end of the House term would have caused the vote to be taken up in the next session when the newly elected House membership would be seated with more Democratic representation, thereby improving Clintons chances of dodging impeachment.
The Republicans did, in fact, agree to delay the hearings, but only for a day or two. Amazingly, Clinton ended the bombing raid after only 70 hours -- once it became clear that in spite of the brief delay, the vote would still be held in the current session.
Once the bombing stopped, Clinton touted the effectiveness and importance of the mission. As reported by ABC News : We have inflicted significant damage on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction programs, on the command structures that direct and protect that capability, and on his military and security infrastructure, he said. Defense secretary William Cohen echoed the point: We estimate that Saddam's missile program has been set back by at least a year.
Whether or not one buys Clintons assessment of that mission, it is difficult to believe that its timing was so critical that it required commencement virtually at the moment the House was scheduled to vote on the impeachment. I think the most reasonable conclusion is that Clinton cynically deployed US military assets and placed military personnel in harms way for purely political reasons.
4) Clintons reckless sexual behavior was a threat to American national security:
Clinton and his supporters have been very effective in persuading large numbers of Americans that the Lewinsky scandal was only about sex. But I see a bigger issue here, because Clinton is on record as saying that he would have done anything to keep knowledge of the Lewinsky affair from becoming public.
To me, that statement raises a very serious question: What if, instead of sending her recorded Lewinsky conversations to Ken Starr, Linda Tripp had instead secretly offered them for sale, say, to the Chinese government? Or to the Russians? Or even to agents of Saddam?
What kind of blackmail leverage would those tapes have provided to a foreign government in dealing with America on sensitive trade, security or military issues? One of the few things Clinton ever said that I believe is that he would have done anything to keep the Lewinsky affair secret. Given his demonstrated track record of selling out American interests for personal or political gain (and there are more examples that I could have cited here), how far would he have gone in compromising Americas real interests in order to protect his own neck when threatened with blackmail?
Pretty far, I believe. Equally distressing is the prospect Clinton might, in fact, have succumbed to foreign black mail on other occasions in order to hide different sexual episodes that ultimately did not become public. There is no way to know, of course, but I prefer presidents for whom such a scenario is not a plausible possibility.
And dont even get me started on the war crime in Kosovo.
WAR IN KOSOVO
During Bill Clintons 1999 NATO-led war in Kosovo which according to some estimates cost as much as $75 billion we bombed Belgrade for 78 days, killed almost 3,000 civilians, and shredded the civilian infrastructure (including every bridge across the Danube.)
We devastated the environment, bombed the Chinese embassy, came very close to engaging in armed combat against Russian forces, and in general, pursued a horrific and inhumane strategy to rain misery on the civilian population of Belgrade in order to pressure Milosevic into surrendering.
Why did we do all that? The US did not even have an arguable interest in the Balkans, and no one ever tried to claim that Serbia represented any kind of threat to our nation or our interests.
But for months the Clinton administration had told us that Milosevic was waging a vicious genocide against Albanian Muslims, and needed to be stopped. The New York Times called it a humanitarian war. In March 1999 the same month that the bombing started Clintons State Department publicly suggested that as many as 500,000 Albanian Kosovars had been murdered by Milosevics regime. In May of that year, as the bombing campaign was drawing to a close, Secretary of Defense William Cohen lowered that estimate 100,000.
Five years after the bombing, after all the forensic investigations had been completed, the prosecutors at Milosevics War Crimes trial in the Hague were barely been able to document a questionable figure of perhaps 5,000 bodies and body parts. During the war, the American people were told that Kosovo was full of mass graves filled with the bodies of murdered Albanian Muslims. But none were ever found.
BILL CLINTON ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
During the election cycle of 1992, George H.W. Bush lost his job after Bill Clinton hammered him relentlessly for having caused the worst economy of the last 50 years.
In fact, as CNNs Brooke Jackson has reported: Three days before Christmas 1992, the National Bureau of Economic Research finally issued its official proclamation that the recession had ended 21 months earlier. What became the longest boom in U.S. history actually began nearly two years before Clinton took office. See (See http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/31/jackson.recession.primer.otsc/).
By the same token, Clinton is generally perceived as having a stellar economic record during his own presidency, in spite of the fact that the economy was already starting to decline during the last year of his term after the stock market crashed in March 2000.
According to a report by MSNBC: The longest economic expansion in U.S. history faltered so much in the summer of 2000 that business output actually contracted for one quarter, the government said Wednesday in releasing a comprehensive revision of the gross domestic product. Based on new data, the Commerce Department said that the GDP the countrys total output of goods and services shrank by 0.5 percent at an annual rate in the July-September quarter of 2000. See: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3676690/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/gdp-figures-revised-downward/.
When you and your wife are each paid $250,000 to $500,000 for a 30 minute speech from groups that benefit from your political influence, paying taxes is just the overhead needed to legitimize the payoff.
Once again, with billy boy, you have to parse his words.
He does not say he is happy he “gets to” pay taxes. he says he is happy he IS ABLE TO pay.
If he said “gets to” it would open challenges to him on why he doesn’t pay more and why he doesn’t pay every month.
Bill, You have been a fool on many fronts.
Don’t expect the rest of the world to follow your example.
He must think there are hundreds of millions of voters out there cherishing their tax bill every April.
I hope he keeps driving this point home. Maybe he can go on the stump with the Mrs., and she can join him proclaiming their joy at owing taxes.
If B/S was green BJ Klinton would be an 18 hole golf course.
When they hear the Clintons talk like this they're thinking 'more for me'.
“”Hillary and I and some of our friends in this audience who live in New York probably pay the highest aggregate tax rates in America, and I thank God every April 15th that Im able to do it, Clinton said.”
O.K., B.J. Then why don’t you and your 1% buddies like Warren Buffet really enjoy yourselves and pay the same amount of taxes on May 15th, June 15th, and July 15th? There’s nothing stopping you.
I’m sure there is a large block of folks out there who think this say. It’s what some of the Founders warned us about.
Here we are.
The damage done to this nation since Reagan, is just tragic.
Isn’t that the truth. And sadly, there seem to be enough worshipers to keep his god busy.
He and his wife make a fortune by being liars and crooks. Why should they care about a portion going to taxes? A good deal of their ill gotten gains come from taxes one way or another.
God will not be mocked!
Depends on what the meaning of "it" is.
If you look carefully, hes talking about "probably" paying.
So BJ is actually saying that he thanks God that he gets to "probably" pay.
But he didn't say he probably pays taxes - he said he probably pays the "highest aggregate tax rates."
How does one "probably pay" a "tax rate"? Well, "one" doesn't - look again, he said "we" do, meaning not him and Hillary, but them plus others in that room.
So he's saying that he's "probably" in the tax rate he guesses some of the other people in the room are in.
But tax rates are not "aggregates."
So he's saying that he's a member of the group of people who would be in the highest tax rate in America, who would "probably" pay taxes at that rate.
But not "certainly" pay taxes at that rate.
And that he thanks God for not "certainly" having to pay taxes at that rate.
Clintons - nothing like them anywhere else in the galaxy.
I think Billy Jeff is just saying he’s happy every April 15th the syphilis didn’t get him.
he can pay mine from now on then
Raise your hand if you think the Clintons really pay their fair share. They have boatloads of money coming in through their various tax sheltered foundations. Not to mention the illegal payouts they are receiving from their many friends in foreign lands.
There is no person in my life that I hate, but the level of my hatred for Bill Clinton astonishes even me.
And to think, there are still people willing to shell out well over six figures to have this idiot speak.
Bill, that is not enough. Very few people can live the life you do, go places in style like you do, eat in the fine restaurants you frequent, get the excellent medical care you have and can afford. Look around yourself and see the homeless man on the corner, the family scrounging though the trash.
Bill, doesn’t it make you sad that you are so rich and they are so poor? Give away the rest of your possessions and go to work for the Salvation Army, take a vow of poverty and become a monk. Show that you’re sincere and not just another millionaire socialist.
Then why doesn’t he pay everything he has?
He has always been a lying SOS.
He don’t mind paying the vig.
Then why did Hillary try to write off his nasty used scivies he “donated” to Good Will?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.