Skip to comments.State Department Report: 40% rise in terrorism last year
Posted on 05/01/2014 7:55:46 AM PDT by rktman
The State Department released its annual report on global terrorism showing a 40% increase in terrorism attacks last year compared to 2012.
The reason? That organization that President Obama claimed during his re-election campaign was "on the run" has been revitalized and it's offshoots and franchies are wreaking havoc around the world.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Why has most of the terrorism been paid for
and weaponized by the US Dept.?
And how long before the 20,000 MANPADs and Sarin,
supplied by the US State Dept., come
home to roost in American cities.
But Obama said....!
Of course they will trot Carney out to say that this is all Bush’s fault and that Bush made a video mocking all Izlamothugs and that Obama embraces all people. Carney will screw himself into the ground trying to make a cogent argument. I never did like carnie folk.......small hands, smell of cabbage.
And that's just federal government terrorism on innocent Americans !
We can only imagine what goes on overseas !
If you are an exterminator and you can't find bugs, you can always invent them. Why would anyone believe anything being said by this government, especially if the State Department is saying it?
Actually, neither the State Department nor the government has any idea what ‘terrorism’ is. Benghazi wasn’t terrorism - it was spontaneous righteous outburst to an inciteful video. No matter that they say they ‘now’ know it wasn’t (they’ve had two years to prepare for the latest redacted emails they’ve been forced to deliver).
They have no effing idea about it - only what’s needed in the cover up, how long they have to cover it up, and who’s working on the slickly crafted dissembling information to spew out when they are finally caught and have to answer some reporter’s questions in front of a camera.
One only can hope they get caught in some Embassy somewhere where the local terrorists haven’t gotten the message about their kabuki production for the American media.
I’m sure most of the increase is subversive tea party and Conservative elements.
Well, we know that the hildebeast has some experience with it. I seem to remember it telling tales about having to dodge sniper bullets in Kosovo or something. Right! We all know how long it take to turn something the size of an air craft carrier. :>}
The most famous lie is on a visit to New Zealand, I think. As is the Clinton (and Obama) custom, trying to insert oneself into some aspect of note, she commented that she was named in honor New Zealander Sir Edmund Hillary, first who climbed Mt Everest.
Problem is that when she was born and named, Sir Edmund had not accomplish that feat.
Same for Slick Willie who in front of the NAACP or similar claimed of remembering hearing of all the black church bombings and arsons when he was ‘growing’ up. Fact checking his ‘growing up’ with occurrences of such yields NO correlation whatsoever.
It is a rite of passage and privilege for any Democrat to lie however they want. Even when caught, a mere “misspoke” or “context” explanation suffices to a willingly complicit media.
Obama and his ‘significant’ other have not so much continued the ‘lying’ part of this (save in every bad economic, social or diplomatic fiasco that has happened) as they have just plain squeezing it all down to how this affects “me me me” or “she she she”. There are lies included, naturally, but the takeaway is that it is all about “me.”
The state department says what Hillary wants to be said.
Why does Hillary want it out there?
To justify their increased anti terrorism efforts.
Didn’t they change the definition of a terrorist a while back?
Take your pick, really. But you must remember the ‘beard’ is the one racking up multimillion dollar vacation bills. The one that is only now that her husband is President is proud of her country. The one that has had a privileged affirmative action life throughout its entirety. That one.