Posted on 05/05/2014 6:31:05 PM PDT by mandaladon
EXCLUSIVE: Documents reviewed by Fox News show there are differences between Benghazi emails released through the federal courts to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch and emails released to the House oversight committee as part of its investigation into the attacks.
The discrepancies are fueling allegations the administration is holding back documents to Congress.
"The key question is whether Congress now has all the documents," Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, a member of the oversight committee, said. As for differences between the two sets of documents, Chaffetz alleged: "They are playing games. The classification and redactions are different. Why should Judicial Watch get more than Congress after issuing a subpoena?"
The emails published by Judicial Watch last week, which showed additional White House involvement in shaping the public explanation of what happened, helped trigger the announcement Friday by House Speaker John Boehner of a select committee to investigate.
Two of the emails, from Sept. 14, 2012, appear to be part of the deliberations in advance of then-U.N. ambassador Susan Rice's Sunday show appearances were she linked an anti-Islam video to the Benghazi attacks. The emails released to Judicial Watch include the names of those who participated in the email chain.
The same emails provided to the House committee do not include names.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
The “real” ones vs. the ones the republicrats altered to make the administration look bad?
Which one was the one the Muslim Brotherhood operative approved of?
What the Norks have been doing is bad for business.
I posted that reply to the wrong thread. Damn!
You had me scratching my head...LOL!
ahaha understandable.......the works of the DORKS....are quite interchangable wth the works of the NORKS
Bifocals, unfortunately.
It’s the old “Shell Game” updated. Give some here, some there, and let them try to find the rest, somewhere (near a shredder perhaps).
If Diogenes came to Wash. DC and looked in the Obama regime for an honest person, he would have committed suicide immediately. No use suffering any more than he had too.
Earlier today I saw a post that claimed the Democrats were accusing the Republicans of doctoring the documents! Yes !! They actually were blaming the Benghazi email discrepancies on the GOP.
Oh my. That doesn’t look good. They should all be running to Myanmar.
I believe the discrepancy is easily explained. The same document was released at two different times to two different organizations by two different people. The second guy screwed up. If the same person who made the release to congress had also made the release to Judicial Watch, they would have looked the same. The second guy didn’t know what should be redacted, from a “stonewall” position.
All communist regimes look alike to me too.
Saw it somewhere too. They can probably make it stick with the lsm too.
And even more strange was that the article was dated May 16th of 2013. If you clicked the link to Huffington it was clearly dated with that date.
” - - - The same emails provided to the House committee do not include names. - - - “
HEY, Trey Gowdy: Looks like yuh got ‘em by the short hairs on OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!
“Obstruction of justice”. Isn’t that what caused Nixon’s downfall? It wasn’t the Watergate break-in that got him in trouble. As I recall, it was the cover-up that brought about his demise and imprisonment for some of his staff.
.....HEY, Trey Gowdy: Looks like yuh got em by the short hairs on OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.....
....now if you can just find that short rope and tall tree.
“If Diogenes came to Wash. DC and looked in the Obama regime for an honest person,”
or need a super tanker to fuel his lamp he uses to alight the search.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.