Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Economy Threatened by Texas from Panama Canal Expansion
American Uncensored News Network ^ | June 5, 2013 | Jonathon Moseley

Posted on 05/05/2014 8:45:05 PM PDT by Moseley

California will take another hit right in the struggling economy starting April 2015. Instead of loading and unloading at California ports, many international cargo ships and oil tankers will start accessing the booming Texas economy. Texas is flourishing under Rick Perry’s Republican policies. A dramatic expansion of the Panama Canal will give more choices to massive, new cargo ships.

The Panama Canal has been at maximum capacity, with more ships transiting the Isthmus of Panama than the canal was designed to handle. But more importantly, changes in the shipping industry are in play. Massive new megaships are transforming the industry. Those ships currently have no choice but to load and unload in California.

This development could shift a slice of a market valued annually in the trillions of dollars away from California toward Texas and other ports on the East Coast of the United States. One ocean port can generate billions of dollars in state and local tax revenues.

The Port of Los Angeles alone generates 919,000 regional jobs and $39.1 billion in wages and tax revenues each year. Los Angeles ports handle about 40% of all the container traffic in the United States. There are a total of 3 million employees in industries related to port operations. Studies project Los Angeles ports will lose between 1% and 25% compared to existing levels of trade.

Greater Los Angeles has remained highly prosperous despite decades of left-wing regulations and governmental policies burdening the California economy. Trade through California ports of entry has helped keep California afloat financially.

Ocean-going shipping is the cheapest mode for transporting freight by far. Therefore, shortening the distance that freight travels over land can dramatically affect the overall expense of importing or exporting products.

(Excerpt) Read more at aun-tv.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: california; panamacanal; ports; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Moseley

Maybe CA will try to sue Texas. And China, and every American, and God. CA will soon be flopping like a beached fish due to their own policies.


21 posted on 05/05/2014 11:42:53 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5th MEB

Well this WILL and IS dying NOW, all water rights cut off due to some
smelt I live in CA. just pathetic GO RICK PERRY!!!! State gets what it
votes for!!!


22 posted on 05/05/2014 11:53:12 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

fl


23 posted on 05/06/2014 12:32:32 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Lenin..Joseph Stalin.
Lenin actually has started a NEP, then he died.

24 posted on 05/06/2014 1:08:00 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Even before the canal expansion opens, The port of Houston is and was #1 in foreign tonnage.

http://www.portofhouston.com/business-development/trade-development-and-marketing/trade-statistics/

Panama Canal Expansion
http://micanaldepanama.com/expansion/


25 posted on 05/06/2014 5:21:21 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Miami doesn’t have the infrastructure to move the massive amounts of goods. Down at the end of the peninsula, rail and highways are very limited. Out of Houston, there are massive amounts of rail lines, as well as multiple interstate highways. Tat is why Miami will remain a regional port, while Houston and Galveston are international ports.


26 posted on 05/06/2014 5:23:45 AM PDT by rstrahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Ooooooooh, California smackdown! Point well made, Sgt Friday!


27 posted on 05/06/2014 6:25:39 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Oh, yes, farming will not be stifled forever. There will be a post-Brown
era. Farming will be and expand again if only to provide jobs to
liberal’s favorite constituency, illegal aliens.


28 posted on 05/06/2014 6:40:16 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

If the final destination is the East Coast, the ships will go to other deep east coast ports as they do now. Texas will still get its share, but probably no more than the proportion it receives today. The big benefit for Texas and other gulf ports will be energy exports going in the other direction.

California port traffic is predicted to decline 10 to 15 percent.


29 posted on 05/06/2014 6:57:56 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Guess I was thinking of the famine of 1921-22....touched parts of eastern Ukraine ...But with out that wonderful new economic plan and the consolidated thuggery of the communists Stalin would not have been possible


30 posted on 05/06/2014 7:19:58 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I live in a ‘rat county.
Typical of such governance, their solution to a shrinking tax base is to raise taxes.


31 posted on 05/06/2014 7:21:43 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nifster; All
for the most part, you're correct..famine was always one season away; Stalin mfg. the Ukrainian one.
(iirc) the NEP; kept most of the land, in the hands of the industrious farmers (Kulaks) and out of the
collectivists' control..the NEP (capitalism) was, successful, but short-lived..the gangsters took over.

think DNC & GOP Establishment/0'Muslim/"Rustler" Reid..Boehner/McConnell.


32 posted on 05/06/2014 8:25:46 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Bathhouse/"Rustler" Reid? :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

Yep. I’m aware of what can happen and understand what I have to do.


33 posted on 05/06/2014 9:02:36 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Character matters for those who understand the concept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Your view of the NEP is distorted at best.....PLANNED economies are NEVER about capitalism and free markets. You have romanticized communism into being something akin to the mafia.

Lenin was no hero. He was no capitalist. He instituted communism which in no way is a good thing. You have yourself twisted into a knot. Stalin existed BECAUSE of communism not because he somehow managed to over take the gran and glorious revolution. Goodness. You have a strange view of the collective


34 posted on 05/06/2014 3:53:45 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

According to the political theory of Marxism–Leninism of the early 20th century, the kulaks were class enemies of the poorer peasants.[3] Vladimir Ilyich Lenin described them as “bloodsuckers, vampires, plunderers of the people and profiteers, who fatten on famine.”[4][5] Marxism–Leninism had intended a revolution to liberate poor peasants and farm laborers alongside the proletariat (urban and industrial workers). In addition, the planned economy of Soviet Bolshevism required the collectivisation of farms and land to allow industrialisation or conversion to large-scale agricultural production. In practice, government officials violently seized kulak farms and murdered resisters;[3][6] others were deported to labor camps.


35 posted on 05/06/2014 4:08:51 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

I also live in California, fortunately for me in the north state in a pretty isolated area.
I have a small 20 acre farm and have my own well for domestic and irrigation purposes.
I am just waiting for the EPA or some state or fed alphabet soup organization to come in and tell me I can’t pump any longer.
I still own a home in SoCal so I make the trip down the I-5 and 99 corridors about twice a year, it would break your heart to see the dead orchards and vineyards for over a hundred miles at a stretch; then maybe a few miles of healthy ground for those people who are paying a premium for their water or are able to pump their own, then another hundred or more miles of EPA/Sierra Club/Congress created desert.
When agriculture leaves this state; and I think it will, I hope every body in the big cities enjoys paying 500% more for their food or just starves to death.


36 posted on 05/06/2014 5:24:55 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson