Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton: Gun Laws Are Too Lenient, Must Be 'Reined In'
Breitbart ^
| 6 May 2014
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 05/07/2014 6:48:21 AM PDT by Cheerio
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Surprise !
Actually I am surprised. She knows this has always been the third rail for Democrat pols. If she were serious about running I'd expect her to lie her arse off until ten minutes after she takes the oath.
To: Cheerio
Hillary, how will all this have saved those lives in Benghazi?
22
posted on
05/07/2014 7:02:19 AM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
To: Cheerio
Clinton said she supports Second Amendment rights, [but]...Why is it that all of the most rabid anti-gunners always start off by saying that they support the second amendment when they obviously don't? Is it that they're stupid or more likely that they think their audience is stupid?
23
posted on
05/07/2014 7:02:22 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: Cheerio
This detestable woman really has a shot for POTUS? If that happens I might seriously start considering an exit strategy, especially after eight long years of Il Douche.
To: Cheerio
Hillary: The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy without one.
25
posted on
05/07/2014 7:09:24 AM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(Jay Carney: The (Benghazi) emails weren't about Benghazi.)
To: Cheerio
and Hillary’s statement that Gov’t can’t be responsible for “every under-capitalized business”, with regard to employers paying for mandated healthcare.
Pure Communism!
It’s just difficult to impose while the citizens are armed.
26
posted on
05/07/2014 7:20:27 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
To: windsorknot
This detestable woman really has a shot for POTUS? If that happens I might seriously start considering an exit strategy, especially after eight long years of Il Douche.
A very good shot. She will be the democrat presidential nominee. The republicans will nominate a statist RINO who has as much chance of winning as the last statist RINO they nominated.
27
posted on
05/07/2014 7:20:38 AM PDT
by
Spirochete
(GOP: Give Obama Power)
To: Cheerio
TRANSLATION: “The government (democrats) can’t take over completely when the citizenry is armed!”
28
posted on
05/07/2014 7:21:23 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
To: Cheerio
Gun Laws Are Too Lenient, Must Be 'Reined In'
and the Internet needs a gatekeeper ...
With the Libs/Dems it is all about control. More regulations, more taxes, more regulations, more laws...
The biggest problem is that many 'across the aisle' actually believe the same things.
29
posted on
05/07/2014 7:22:48 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: deoetdoctrinae
The way out for leftists always involves the word but. "I support your (fill in the blank) rights, BUT..."Does that make them butheads?
Seriously, all they're saying is, "I'm making noises to make it LOOK LIKE I support your rights, BUT I really don't."
To: Cheerio
If HilLIARy is the answer, it must be a really stupid question.
31
posted on
05/07/2014 7:23:47 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period. PALIN/CRUZ 2016)
To: Cheerio
Sorry Hillary. Settled law.
32
posted on
05/07/2014 7:29:34 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
("Heck of a reset there, Hillary")
To: Cheerio
One word. Waco. Two more. F—k off.
33
posted on
05/07/2014 7:32:11 AM PDT
by
Darren McCarty
(Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
To: Cheerio
Mrs.
Benghazillary says...
...there needs to be a proper trade-off between safety and freedom.
And THIS is the telling phrase.
Benghazillary would like low info peeps to believe that it's safety or freedom, and that if you let her seize your freedom, she gives you safety.
(We, however, happen to know that 2A freedom and safety are linked on the same side of the equation, n'est ce pas?)
.
34
posted on
05/07/2014 7:38:31 AM PDT
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Cheerio
Proper trade-off between safety and freedom.
WE ARE GOING TO TALE THINGS AWAY FROM YOU FOR THE COMMON GOOD.
HILLARY CLINTON
35
posted on
05/07/2014 7:55:38 AM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: Cheerio
I’m pleased to hear her start in with this... Whatever PIAPS does to dispel the grossly mistaken notion she’s some kind of a “moderate” is a good thing.
36
posted on
05/07/2014 7:56:08 AM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(Obama is so far in over his head, even his ears are beneath the water level.)
To: Raycpa
Imagine if Hillary had a gun when she heard about Monica Lewinsky?
Imagine Hillary’s career if Juanita Broaddrick had been carrying a concealed handgun.
To: Boonie
Of course she knew. She was upset he was so brazen and so easily caught.
38
posted on
05/07/2014 8:00:06 AM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: Cheerio
Question: what are the substantive differences between Georgia’s new gun law, and Vermont’s existing one(s)?
To: Cheerio
proper trade-off between safety and freedom Old Stalin couldn't have said it better himself!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson