Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton: No Reason To Continue Benghazi Investigation
BREITBART TV ^ | 7 May 2014

Posted on 05/07/2014 5:56:46 PM PDT by kingattax

Wednesday at "Philanthropy New York's 35th Annual Meeting," former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told ABC News' Robin Roberts there is no reason to continue the investigation into her State Departments actions in the early days of the 2012 Benghazi terror attack which left four Americans dead.

“Were you satisfied with the answers and are you content with what you know what happened?” Roberts asked.

"Absolutely," she replied.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; lyingbitch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: kinsman redeemer

You will be looking a long time...FRiend.


41 posted on 05/07/2014 6:55:20 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

A lying liberal socialist in the tank “journalist”......


42 posted on 05/07/2014 6:57:26 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

You’re nailing a major major flaw. In a normal just world she wouldn’t have the nerve to run.

This incident doesn’t have enough exposure and you’re keeping it alive.


43 posted on 05/07/2014 6:58:17 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Yes, I think that. And, it was with Obama’s approval. John Brennan is up to his ears in it too.


44 posted on 05/07/2014 6:59:29 PM PDT by jch10 (The Democrat mascot shouldnÂ’t be the donkey; it should be the tick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Indeed Sold Out to that Fundamental Change thing


45 posted on 05/07/2014 6:59:47 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Hillary, dear. You sound stupid. If there’s actually nothing to be found, let the investigation go forward and the investigators will look like a bunch of buffoons. You should sit there and gleefully go along with everything if there’s nothing to hide - it will blow up in their faces (pardon the pun).


46 posted on 05/07/2014 7:02:25 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Her comment is as believable as her claimed lack of knowledge as to how the Rose Law firm billing records ended up in the White House residence.


47 posted on 05/07/2014 7:02:31 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

Hillery will “come clean” about Benghazi about the same time she “comes clean” about Vince Foster or “Cattlegate”.


48 posted on 05/07/2014 7:06:50 PM PDT by BwanaNdege ( "...[willful] ignorance is the opiate of academic elites." - Mike Adams [BN edit])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Today Hillary was asked the probing and difficult question, “How do you feel about the Benghazi investigaton?”...or something to that effect. That question is about as serious as asking her about her favorite baseball team.

Instead of lobbing up softballs, perhaps ABC should have asked, “Will you give the American People a minute-by-minute review of where you were starting from the moment you heard about the attack up to and through the next days Press Confernce with Obama?”

Here’s another real question, “When the Benghazi attack occurred, the Ambassodor and his people most certainly called for help. Who made the decision not to send help? What was their justification? Certainly the call for help and other related calls have been recorded somewhere. Will you please release these recordings to the public?”

When these two questions get answered, her part of it is done. Don’t count how many comittees have been formed. Count ho many questions have been answered.

We eventually need to find out where the President was during the same period and who came up with those phony ‘Video’ talking points. By the way, the ‘Video’ BS doesn’t even apply to the real demonstraions around the Middle East. Don’t even fall for that. The ‘Video’ story was created whole-cloth in the Whitehouse.

It’s so sad that an American Administration would be so blatently corrupt and, quite frankly, mean. Worse than that though, is an American Media that has become so feckless and toothless over the last 30 years. ABC’s job is to put Hillary on the hot seat and grill her until her skin turns red. It isn’t to ask her if ‘she likes the weather this time of year?’ Rememeber when reporters used to actually hold the powerful to account? Nixon would. It’s all so corrupt now it makes my heart ache.

Perhaps trey Gowdy can shed some light on the situation. He seems like a good, intelligent, and decent man. Still, if had an affair, or money troubles, or has an ex-girl friend from back in college who narks on him about doing shrooms or whatever, the Dem Machine will find it out and destroy him.

This group in the Whitehouse is absolutely vicious. I’ve seen nothing like it in my lifetime. Obama is a very mean and troubled person.

I truly think Lerner (from the IRS scandal-changing gears a bit) is more mortified of Obama than she is of the House investigation. She got herself in way way too deep and she’s getting it from both sides now. Who knows what will happen to her if she spills the beans on Obama?—and she’s one of his strong allies.


49 posted on 05/07/2014 7:20:42 PM PDT by Mustangman (The GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mustangman

Great post

I think it will have to be clear to her that she is facing prison. Then I believe she will open up.

However we nay see some others in the irs step up. Can’t believe no one will be honest in the face of tyrannical behavior.


50 posted on 05/07/2014 7:25:32 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Sickening. ABC has said nothing about this story all week. Then they bring out horse face to toss out a softball question and left un-challenged. I am pissed off at the msm! This is getting really scary!


51 posted on 05/07/2014 7:29:57 PM PDT by parmamenian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Don’t know what to make of this.

Sen. Schumer emerges as surprise key player in Benghazi scandal

http://www.examiner.com/article/sen-schumer-emerges-as-surprise-key-player-benghazi-scandal?CID=examiner_alerts_article

Apparently he was at the white house for the entire duration of the Benghazi attack.


52 posted on 05/07/2014 7:31:40 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I disagree. The best explanation for why it wasn’t a planned kidnapping was from Anne Barnhardt, and is as follows:

“Next is the whole “kidnapping plot gone wrong” argument. Sorry. It doesn’t hold water. First, the theory that Obama wanted to do a prisoner exchange of Ambassador Stevens for the Blind Sheik right before the election in order to look like some sort of hero is simply ludicrous. Americans would have been repulsed and disgusted by such a move. Americans don’t cotton to capitulation to kidnappers. And releasing the Blind Sheik? No, this would have worked against Obama in public opinion. The fact of one of our Ambassadors being kidnapped at all would have come off as a sign of profound weakness, and releasing the Blind Sheik would have pegged the needle on the ol’ wimp-o-meter.”

“Next, this kidnapping scenario assumes that the Obama regime was relying on fairly contested elections, had no election fraud teams in place in the major metro areas of the swing states, and/or was truly Nixonian in its desire for a unanimous victory. Again, nope. They clearly weren’t going for a unanimous or near-unanimous electoral college sweep as Nixon was trying to do. They were all about targeted fraud in the swing states. They had no care or concern about winning Kansas, Wyoming or Oklahoma. The motives simply don’t match up.”

“Finally, we have to ask why the Clintons were co-conspirators in the murder of Stevens. WHY are the Clintons a.) participating in the initial murder of Stevens and b.) not throwing Obama and Jarrett under the bus? The Obama machine stole the 2008 primaries from Hillary, and both Bill and Hillary personally loathe Obama and his Chicago crew. Why this unholy demonic alliance?”

“Because Chris Stevens was a lynchpin in the running of arms by the Obama regime and Clinton’s State Department in full cooperation with each other to the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda through Libya. And yes, it is absolutely sane and appropriate to assume that Huma Abedin (Hillary’s consigliere and daughter of high-ranking Muslim Brotherhood leaders, and possible lesbian concubine of Hilary) figures into this.”

The Saudi Royal family paid for BHO2’s Harvard Law School. He owed them.


53 posted on 05/07/2014 7:55:20 PM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Sort of what I was thinking....she has an evil that is absolutely frightening.


54 posted on 05/07/2014 8:01:47 PM PDT by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coup d'etats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

The theory this person states does make a lot of sense..I can see that scenario happening..but what about Smith, Doherty, and Woods, since this was a planned ambush to get Stevens where do they play into all this..were they expected to arrive to try to save Stevens or was their appearance unexpected? I can still see the Blind Sheikh for Stevens swap happening though, I know it seems discounted here, but prisoner swaps are done all the time. Look at Israel, they swapped hundreds of Palestinian prisoners to get back ONE soldier(Gilad Shalit) this would have only involved releasing one guy


55 posted on 05/07/2014 8:06:41 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

It was hit. Chris Stevens was murdered and both the POTUS & Secretary of State were in on it. He knew too much about the Administration’s shipping arms to Al Qaida in Syria and their involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Amb. Stevens was denied cover and became a liability. The truth will come out, but I do not expect it to surface in my lifetime. IMO


56 posted on 05/07/2014 8:18:11 PM PDT by ssschev (Pick up the can, throw out the trash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

This administration has no morals. They do not care about other’s lives, just their own.


57 posted on 05/07/2014 8:19:17 PM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE US OF US CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Maybe eventually some ghoul will dig her up and put her rotting corpse in one...just for laughs.


58 posted on 05/07/2014 8:19:25 PM PDT by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey
what sort of JOURNALIST asks dopey questions like that???

An idiot woman who hopes she might take Huma's place in Hillary's bed.

59 posted on 05/07/2014 8:21:56 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

“No reason to get excited,”
The thief – he kindly spoke,
“There are many here among us
Who feel that life is but a joke
But you and I we’ve been through that
And this is not our fate
So let us not talk falsely now
The hour’s getting late.”


60 posted on 05/07/2014 8:24:53 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson