One can always imagine anything, but folks like Darrell Issa are not known for making up fluff.
Sure let’s find out what we can if we can, but the GOP isn’t going to embarrass itself doing something as stupid as what nitzy thinks, especially since a lot of the GOP hates the tea partiers anyhow.
I will say that I want an investigation. I will say this doesn't look right and we need to get to the bottom of it. But I am not going to say that I know for sure that they were audited at an unjust rate.
There is some manipulative reason why the exact information is slow to come out. I just don't want us to look like idiots with egg on our faces in a couple weeks after we have been ranting and raving about a tyranny that may not be real. Obviously, Democrat_media has no qualms about looking like an idiot.
With many political questions there are things that can be objectively proven and things that can't. If something cannot be objectively proven you need to argue your case so that more people will believe your opinion rather than the opposite opinion. In instances where something CAN be objectively proven you only need to argue in favor of full disclosure and the truth will eventually reveal itself.
Is Obama destroying America? - This question is not possible to objectively prove. That is why we who believe that he is destroying America must argue the best that we can to prove that he is.
Were these Tea Party people unfairly targeted? - This question CAN be objectively proven. All we need is to see the data. There is no reason to go making a case for why we believe this or that. Just look at the data when it comes out and we will be able to tell. At this point, all of the data is not out. We should be screaming from the rooftops to ensure that it does come out but we should be making any hasty proclamations before that time.