Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats propose Internet voting in 2016, making Republican also consider the idea
Fox News ^ | May 10 2014 | Fox News

Posted on 5/10/2014, 7:31:49 PM by PoloSec

Democrats are thinking about using Internet balloting in 2016 to expand their voter base and select a president -- prompting Republicans to consider such a strategy to keep from losing ground.

Iowa Democrats proposed the idea and several others during a recent Democratic National Committee meeting, saying Internet balloting could expand access to their unique caucus process to overseas military personnel, absentee voters and others.

-SNIP-

“I think it’s a very bad idea,” says the Heritage Foundation’s Hans von Spakovsky, who thinks computer-based voting will never happen, or at least not in the “foreseeable future.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ballotstuffing; democrats; hillary2016; howtostealanelection; internetvoting; onlinevoting; republicans; voterfraud; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: PoloSec

This has ** VOTER FRAUD ** written all over it.

So easy to write code to automatically cast votes. Another DemocRAT idea to stuff the ballot box.


21 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:44:46 PM by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lefty-lie-spy

Would be fun ... How about some districts vote 200% of those on the rolls? All Conservative, of course. Heck, let’s get it on. 12,000,000 is the low side.


22 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:45:31 PM by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: andyk

The states and feds have flushed about $1 BILLION of software development down the crapper trying to bring the wonders of commie-medicine to the hoi polloi.

How many more billions could they flush trying to make internet voting work?

Governments are simply INCAPABLE of building functioning systems.

Why don’t they just hand you the ballot for the NEXT election every time you vote? Then you could have a couple years to casually mail it in...or sell it to OFA or some other enterprising tyrannical group.


23 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:46:13 PM by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

FRAUD


24 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:47:05 PM by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

Not enough, erkelly. Voters must prove they are not sucking the government teat before being allowed to vote. If you’re a parasite mooch, no vote for you. Unless you are retired and are lawfully drawing against the Social Security you paid into for decades.


25 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:47:58 PM by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals
Am going to vote 12,000,000 times ... I’ll see a new break!

Careful, big brother is watching :-)

On second thought, just pretend you are a democrat, and you will be fine.

26 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:48:03 PM by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Pretending ....


27 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:48:38 PM by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: erkelly
oops, I also want a paper ballot.

And purple fingers.

28 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:48:46 PM by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

How about we repeal XIX as a start?


29 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:50:34 PM by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erkelly
Darn it, I want one-day voting, with the same poll hours across all time zones, I want proof of residency requirement; I want voter ID and I want the voter to prove he is a citizen in order to get it. I want the voting age raised back up to 21. I want the voter to be compis mentis; able to read, write and speak English, and to demonstrate basic understanding of how our country works and what he is voting for or against. Is that really too much to ask

No, sir! I'm on board with this.

Libs argued during 'Nam that if an 18 could be drafted they should have the right to vote. Fair enough.

We no longer have the draft so the requirement should go back to 21

Voter ID and proof of residency should be the bare minimum.

30 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:51:06 PM by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: andyk

And we know how secure and private an internet vote would be.


31 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:52:30 PM by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Democrats are thinking about using Internet balloting in 2016 to expand their voter base and select a president -- prompting Republicans to consider such a strategy to keep from losing ground.

I thought doing what Dems wanted all the time was the DEFINITION of losing ground.

32 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:52:44 PM by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Exactly. Oregon could not get a single person successfully registered into Obamacare, but somehow each person will successfully vote 10 times for the Democratic candidate, but not once for the Republican.

-PJ

33 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:52:49 PM by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: erkelly
How about voting at precincts near ones residence, so those manning the polls can identify pretty accurately legitimate votes?

The small town in MA where I used to live, no one could get by those poll watchers without being legit.

34 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:55:03 PM by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

Yep. One day vote, same time all zones or a results blackout, paper ballot, national holiday and day off, purple thumb, thumbprint on absentee ballots, voter ID...


35 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:57:57 PM by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

Heck, with 12 upstanding people can multiply by 12. 12 X 12,000,000. Can anyone say landslide?


36 posted on 5/10/2014, 7:58:56 PM by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

Nope.

It’s not.

At least you didn’t require voters to be land owners.

:)

[but maybe you should]


37 posted on 5/10/2014, 8:00:25 PM by Salamander (Black Ace Dog Handler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

If republicans had one iota of common sense they’d oppose it on the grounds of racism.

No one who can’t afford an ID card can afford internet access.


38 posted on 5/10/2014, 8:01:00 PM by null and void ( They don't think think they are above the law. They think they are the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
The Right in this country should be actively working to DISENFRANCHISE THE PARASITE CLASS and prevent voter fraud by any means necessary.

Therefore every asinine idea proposed by the CPUSA to promote even more voter fraud should be countered by proposals to restrict the franchise amongst felons, those receiving federal welfare benefits, those who fail to file income tax forms, register for the selective service etc.

Republican Governors should require ALL residents to re-register and require valid proof of US citizenship before issuing new voter ID cards.

The Founders were vehemently opposed to Universal Suffrage, and there was and continues to be no Right to vote in the Constitution of the United States.

39 posted on 5/10/2014, 8:01:43 PM by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

Er wot? No purple fingers?


40 posted on 5/10/2014, 8:01:57 PM by null and void ( They don't think think they are above the law. They think they are the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson