Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/10/2014 12:31:49 PM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: PoloSec
Iowa Democrats proposed the idea and several others during a recent Democratic National Committee meeting, saying Internet balloting could expand access to their unique caucus process to overseas military personnel, absentee voters and others.

Right, because they've always been so interested in making sure those deployed overseas get to vote.
2 posted on 05/10/2014 12:33:23 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

What could go wrong?


3 posted on 05/10/2014 12:33:41 PM PDT by FreeperCell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Not expand their bas but inssure that they can thoroughly corrups the voting procesws in their favor.


4 posted on 05/10/2014 12:35:14 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Ocean ... and the depth.


5 posted on 05/10/2014 12:36:59 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Darn it, I want one-day voting, with the same poll hours across all time zones, I want proof of residency requirement; I want voter ID and I want the voter to prove he is a citizen in order to get it. I want the voting age raised back up to 21. I want the voter to be compis mentis; able to read, write and speak English, and to demonstrate basic understanding of how our country works and what he is voting for or against. Is that really too much to ask?


6 posted on 05/10/2014 12:37:50 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Am going to vote 12,000,000 times ... I’ll see a new break!


8 posted on 05/10/2014 12:38:46 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

They are just trying to reduce spending.

It is much more cost effective to manipulate the vote via computer and internet instead of paying actual people for their votes, hiring buses to trundle fraudulent voters from one polling place to another, and paying other people to stuff ballot boxes with bogus votes.

The computer is truly a labor saving device.


9 posted on 05/10/2014 12:38:59 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Malaysia Flight MH370 Black Box signals reported in Bermuda Triangle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

And all the servers will run on Windows 3.1.


10 posted on 05/10/2014 12:40:00 PM PDT by lefty-lie-spy (Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/ - via iPhone from Tokyo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

IMHO, voting by using the Internet, with it’s attendant fraud and hacking problems, is the only way Killary can win and the RATS know it.


11 posted on 05/10/2014 12:40:27 PM PDT by upchuck (Support ABLE, the Anybody But Lindsey Effort. Yes, we are the ABLE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Sure, lete’s open another door for MASSIVE vote fraud. What could possibly go wrong?


12 posted on 05/10/2014 12:40:42 PM PDT by tcrlaf (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
Spelling correction follows

Not expand their Base, but insurer that they can thoroughly corrupt the voting process in their favor.

13 posted on 05/10/2014 12:41:11 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

Question: When they allow internet voting, I purposely chose when over if because should the Democrats propose it, the republicans will chime right in for it. When internet voting is allowed, When the votes for the Democrat candidate exceed the population of the United States by a wide margin, will it be considered vote fraud?


14 posted on 05/10/2014 12:41:27 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
If it's a means of voting that can be rigged, the Dims will be on it like a rat on a Cheeto. And the lo-fo's of course, will snap it up. Why leave your living room when you can just vote yourself all your government goodies on your new ObamaPad?


16 posted on 05/10/2014 12:41:49 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

The only computer voting I want to see is the Congress voting from their home districts and never receiving another taxpayer dime to travel to Washington.

If there ever was a PERFECT case for telecommuting it is the US congress and senate.


18 posted on 05/10/2014 12:42:25 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Liberty or Big Government - you can't have both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
With geo - spoofing, the whole world will vote in American elections. I use a private VPN that lets me appear to be from any of a few dozen countries.

-PJ

19 posted on 05/10/2014 12:43:36 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

What could possibly go wrong?


20 posted on 05/10/2014 12:43:59 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

This has ** VOTER FRAUD ** written all over it.

So easy to write code to automatically cast votes. Another DemocRAT idea to stuff the ballot box.


21 posted on 05/10/2014 12:44:46 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

FRAUD


24 posted on 05/10/2014 12:47:05 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec

How about we repeal XIX as a start?


29 posted on 05/10/2014 12:50:34 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PoloSec
Democrats are thinking about using Internet balloting in 2016 to expand their voter base and select a president -- prompting Republicans to consider such a strategy to keep from losing ground.

I thought doing what Dems wanted all the time was the DEFINITION of losing ground.

32 posted on 05/10/2014 12:52:44 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson