This is the fundamental flaw in the whole story.
However, I will suggest this. The heat-sink idea....where urban areas, concrete and asphalt, along with massive deforestation in large segments of the world....is likely one of the true issues of existence.
It is a proven fact that after the Panama Canal was completed....weather in the region did change to a fair degree. Statistics over decades has show it’s effect regionally. I think if the environmentalists did their homework and used models right...the heat-sink issue would be the one true issue that is of value, and we could force urban areas to throw up more trees and offer less concrete. But it’s not really a problem which draws redistribution of wealth....which is the fundamental magnet for every single global warming issue.
Well said - I am also not so surprised that it is the western world who has to pay as they want to even out the wealth. The annual Indonesian burn off for Palm Oil plantations puts the equivalent CO2 into the air as much as 93 million cars. China’s every increasing coal fire power plants are putting more pollutants into the air than any other country but it is the western countries, who are already becoming more efficient in the production of power and low emission vehicles, who have to pay. Absolute BS!
:: the one true issue that is of value, and we could force urban areas to throw up more trees and offer less concrete. But it’s not really a problem which draws redistribution of wealth ::
Especially since it is the intent to “redistribute” said wealth to the coffers of the urban-area governments.
Do these windmills ever get put in climate models?
But Owebqma had to give the speech to write off the millions of dollars for attending a fundraiser to the taxpayers.