Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hearne City Council Fires Officer Who Shot & Killed 93-year-old Woman
kbtx.com ^ | 10 May,2014 | Staff

Posted on 05/12/2014 8:19:50 AM PDT by marktwain

HEARNE – The police officer who shot and killed a 93-year-old woman is out of a job.

Saturday afternoon, the city council met to discuss taking possible disciplinary action against Officer Stephen Stem. It took them less than 30 minutes to reach a unanimous vote to fire him.

Stem responded to a 911 call Tuesday from Pearlie Golden’s nephew. She was upset about not being allowed to drive after failing a driver’s license renewal test. Roy Jones says when he wouldn’t give Golden her car keys, she went into the house and grabbed a .38 revolver. Jones then ran to the side of the house and called 911.

Stem ordered Golden to put the gun down, but Golden refused. Jones said Golden fired two shots gun into the ground. At that point, Robertson County District Attorney Coty Seigert said Stem fired four shots, hitting Golden twice, once in the right arm and once in the upper chest. Seigert says they have not confirmed whether Golden fired first.

During a protest march on Thursday, Quannel X and the Black Panther Nation threatened to protest in front of Stem’s house, if he was not fired. But the activist asked protestors to “give (council members) a chance to do what's right right.”

Mayor Ruben Gomez said he would recommend termination. Today, city attorney Bryan Ross advised the council do to the same.

In a statement Friday to News 3, Stem's attorney Robert McCabe said he is “fully confident that Officer Stem’s actions were immediately necessary and legally justified.”

Today, McCabe told us he will meet with Stem next week to discuss the termination and what step to take next.

Stem has been a police officer since August 2008. He previously worked for Bryan and Lott. Stem joined the Hearne Police Department in July 2012. Six months later, he shot and killed 28-year-old Tederalle Satchell who was shooting a gun from inside a vehicle in the parking lot of the Columbus Village Apartments. A Grand Jury did not indict Stem in that shooting.

The District Attorney’s Office tells News 3 it could take a couple of months for the Golden case to be presented to a grand jury.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 93yearold; banglist; hearne; tx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: vette6387
There really isn’t any justification for these kinds of acts on the part of cops.

There really is not any justification for calling the cops on your neighbor unless you want their pets killed, them harrassed, roughed up, dragged away in handcuffs or killed outright.

You do not call the cops for someone who needs help.

21 posted on 05/12/2014 9:41:00 AM PDT by Chuckster (The longer I live the less I care about what you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Arm chairing is easy. What if she kept firing and one of her rounds ricocheted and hit someone? What then?

What if she was your mother? Arm chairing is easy, but then so is a shoot everything policy.

I've got $100 that says that the cop wouldn't have shot a family member of his under the exact same circumstances. The job comes with accepting a certain amount of risk, if you are going to 'protect and serve'.

So, going back to your "what if" question, you do eliminate the "what if someone would have gotten hurt?" question by killing the old woman. Do you see the issue with logic trap with that solution?

Underlying point being that there should be better methods for handling crazy people than euthanizing them.

22 posted on 05/12/2014 9:53:21 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

Yep, I’m guessing that giving the woman her keys back (and disabling the car) would have been a quick fix.


23 posted on 05/12/2014 9:54:33 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

A 93 year old woman or a 10 year old boy firing a gun is exactly the same threat as a 20 year old, 300 pound guy firing a gun.

I have no idea whether this particular shooting was righteous, but the age and sex of the shooter is irrelevant.

This is, BTW, one of the drawbacks of widely available firearms. With no gun involved, the age and sex of the person becomes very relevant and the situation could almost certainly have been defused without anybody being injured or killed.


24 posted on 05/12/2014 10:07:41 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Correct-I said that when this was initially posted-disconnect one of the battery cables, the accelerator, etc. I’ve only disconnected an accelerator once, but it was enough to stop my extremely inebriated first husband from driving when he could barely walk-when he gave up, I took the keys and hid them-no cops, no jailed or dead person, no fault or guilt on my part...


25 posted on 05/12/2014 10:46:19 AM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

There was in a previous time. They were institutionalized but alas the left and PC crowd deemed that they “deserved” to live among us no matter their behavior or ramifications. A pill can fix everything, not.

As to your what if your mother question? If you know your mother and actually spend time with her more than once a year you would know what she is capable of or not. This officer was not facing his mother. Non-sequitor. He was answering a domestic disturbance call and facing a person with a weapon who was firing it. It is easy to say what you would do when you have days to analyze and form an opinion. The officer has seconds to make a decision. Unless you have been under fire those decisions are unknown until they happen.


26 posted on 05/12/2014 11:38:57 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

If that is your answer, disband the police department. They are of no use to us.


27 posted on 05/12/2014 11:47:36 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Whatever happened to bean-bag shotguns? Yes, a couple of rounds sprayed around the nayborhood isn’t good, but where is the situation assessment process anymore?


28 posted on 05/12/2014 2:05:21 PM PDT by SgtHooper (This is my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I always thought the Officer was justified in this case. I was stunned that the Nephew called the cops. With senile or demented elderly you give her the car keys and wait for her to cycle into a different state of mind, or takes a nap. Then you take her pistol and keys then get her medical attention. Why on earth call the cops when crazy granny pulls a gun. Leave and come back later with food. She is like a 2 year old with a toy.

Why can’t people take care of their own without getting the State involved? The State and Law Enforcement should be the last option not the first option.


29 posted on 05/12/2014 2:07:18 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deco et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
I've got $100 that says that the cop wouldn't have shot a family member of his under the exact same circumstances. The job comes with accepting a certain amount of risk, if you are going to 'protect and serve'.

I think your $100 is safe, and you've also got the Thread Win.

30 posted on 05/12/2014 4:30:36 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
"The underlying issue is how the police respond to calls like this."

Different era. Different law enforcement policies. Different outcomes: my neighbor's father, a WWII combat veteran went nuts one night while residing in an assisted living facility. A change in his meds triggered dementia. He grabbed his old .45 pistol, went into the front lobby, and fired a round into the ceiling, demanding the immediate surrender of all German forces in the area.

Startled front desk personnel summoned the cops. When a lone officer arrived, he gave the man a proper military salute, addressing him as "Sir" and "Colonel." He told him he had been sent to assist the Colonel in securing the area and taking control of the situation. Returning the salute, the "Colonel" returned the weapon to his waistband.

From there it was just a matter of "tea and conversation" for a few minutes, while the Colonel agreed to a "weapons inspection" by the "Provost." Tragedy averted by sympathetic and well trained facility personnel who fully informed responders of the situation and its background, and a quick thinking young officer trained in the days prior to the militarization of U.S. law enforcement.

31 posted on 05/13/2014 6:34:50 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PowderMonkey

Excellent example of ‘to protect and to serve’.

Our military in combat has tighter ROE than our domestic police force.


32 posted on 05/13/2014 11:33:13 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson