Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: I want the USA back

There have been more than 200 lawsuits adjudicated since 2008 that have challenged Obama’s eligibility. The latest legal challenge to Obama’s natural born citizenship status will be discussed in conference at SCOTUS later this week (Vogt v. U.S. District Court for The Western District of Washington).


26 posted on 05/12/2014 9:48:47 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus
There have been more than 200 lawsuits adjudicated since 2008 that have challenged Obama’s eligibility. The latest legal challenge to Obama’s natural born citizenship status will be discussed in conference at SCOTUS later this week (Vogt v. U.S. District Court for The Western District of Washington).

Yes People, the courts have Spoken! Everyone just needs to accept the Plessy v Ferguson verdict, and quit bother people about it. "Separate but Equal" is the law of the land, and there is NOTHING anyone can do to change it!

The Courts are our masters, and we must blindly obey anything these morons tell us!


37 posted on 05/12/2014 10:27:32 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus
While in the vast majority of their constitutionally related writings the Founding Fathers were explicit that the judicial branch of government is effectively the weakest of the three, such is not the case with today’s modern misapplication. Americans currently live under what is, for all intents and purposes, a counter-constitutional judiciocracy led by nine unelected, black-robed autocrats.

Over many decades, the other two branches of government, the legislative and the executive, have, for some inexplicable reason, acquiesced to the notion of judicial supremacy – a dangerously dominant concept that erroneously regards the United States Supreme Court as the final arbiter of all things public policy. If this is so, then these nine men and women are ultimately unaccountable to anyone or anything, and the other two branches of government are but toothless figurehead bodies merely spinning their wheels while spending our dollars.

This flies in the face of the framers’ intent. It’s also the very unfortunate reality under which we live. It is fully within the constitutional authority of the other two branches of government to rein in these judges gone wild, but, regrettably, no one, as of yet, seems to have the mettle to do what needs to be done.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3155052/posts

And Nero, that's what a CONSERVATIVE Opinion of the judiciary looks like. You seem completely unfamiliar with the fact that Conservatives detest the Judicial system because they rightfully see it as completely out of whack with original intent and even basic common sense.

You may be bewildered as to why no one takes your cites of court cases seriously, well that's because conservatives simply think the court system is broken, and generally incapable of doing anything competently. They are like retarded children, but children who hold power.

42 posted on 05/12/2014 10:42:39 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus; DiogenesLamp

Please provide specific citation if I’m incorrect in my understanding that NO lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility have been “adjudicated”. All have been discarded in the initial stages as “having no standing”. In other words, none has been through the “legal process by which an arbiter or judge reviews evidence and argumentation including legal reasoning set forth by opposing parties to come to a decision which determines rights and obligations between the parties involved”.

I look forward to seeing your list of 200+ challenges which have been adjudicated, and which, apparently - from what you intimate - found Obama to be Constitutionally eligible for the office of President.

Thank you.


49 posted on 05/12/2014 1:43:20 PM PDT by GGMac ((lesson learned re Obie: parse every sentence, every word, every gesture, every photo))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus

The more germane case before the Suprmeme Court this week is Paige v. Vermont.

Paige’s lawyer is Mario Apuzzo who is famous for the two-citizen parent theory. Their petition is here:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/paige-v-state-of-vermont-et-al-us-supreme-court-writ-of-certiorari-march-7-2014-update-mario-apuzzo-and-counsel-obama-eligibility-natural-born-citizen-deficiency/

Both Vogt and Paige are scheduled for the conference on the 15th. The results (probably denials) will be released on the 19th.


56 posted on 05/13/2014 7:03:30 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson