The 9/11 Memorial Museum Pavilion,
seen in the left of this picture, will open
to the public on May 21, 2014.
(Photo: National September 11 Memorial Museum)
Posted on 05/13/2014 9:23:20 AM PDT by jazusamo
(CNSNews.com) – Days before the National September 11 Memorial Museum opens in New York, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is stepping up its campaign to urge organizers to edit a video presentation on al-Qaeda, to remove terms such as “Islamist extremism” and “jihadism.”
An earlier CAIR initiative – a letter last month co-signed by several other Muslim and Arab-American organizations, complaining to museum directors about what they called “academically controversial terminology” – met with no success.
On Monday CAIR’s New York chapter began asking “all Americans” to lobby national and New York leaders on the issue.
A “click and send” letter made available by the chapter calls for the short video entitled “The Rise of Al-Qaeda” to be edited to remove “anti-Islamic terminology,” before the museum opens to the public next Wednesday.
The appeal is addressed to President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, New York Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Charles Schumer, Mayor Bill de Blasio, and City Councilwoman Margaret Chin, who represents lower Manhattan.
CAIR said in a statement that the use in the video of terms like “Islamist extremism” and “jihadism” – and the “generalizing” way in which they are used – “conflate Islam and terrorism and carry the risk of misinforming museum visitors, particularly those unfamiliar with Islam.”
“After repeated requests to correct misrepresentations, the film ignorantly implies a religion, rather than a group of criminals, was to blame for the September 11 attacks,” said CAIR-NY board member Zead Ramadan. “Instead of unifying all Americans against evil-doers, this film continues to offensively cast suspicion on faith rather address the terrorist act.”
The New York Times reported last month that the museum’s interfaith advisory group, after viewing the seven minute-long video, pressed for it to be edited, to no avail.
It quoted the president of the foundation overseeing the memorial and museum, Joseph C. Daniels, as saying, “From the very beginning, we had a very heavy responsibility to be true to the facts, to be objective, and in no way smear an entire religion when we are talking about a terrorist group.”
In a letter to museum directors dated April 21, members of the advisory group reiterated their earlier expressed concerns that “given the content of the video, museum visitors who do not have a very sophisticated understanding of the issues could easily come away equating al-Qaeda with Islam generally.”
The group’s members asked again for the video to be edited. If that was not possible, they asked for a disclaimer or statement to be included at the beginning of the film, or displayed prominently at the site of the presentation in the museum.
They suggested that it say something like: “This video in no way intends to imply that the vast majority of Muslims agree with or support the attacks perpetrated by the members of al-Qaeda. Most Muslim leaders and Muslim organizations worldwide have disavowed the ideology and actions of Al Qaeda. The Museum’s documentation of Al-Qaeda-inspired terrorism should not be mistaken for any implicit or explicit justification for racial, religious or ethnic profiling.”
On Thursday the museum and memorial will begin a six-day “dedication period,” open to 9/11 families and survivors, 9/11 rescue and recovery workers, active duty first responders from agencies that lost members in the 9/11 attacks, and lower Manhattan residents and business owners. It then opens to the general public on May 21.
The museum’s website includes a question-and-answer section.
An entry entitled, “What is an Islamist extremist?” states: “‘Islamists’ see Islam as a guiding ideology for politics and the organization of society. That is, they believe that strict adherence to religious law should be the sole basis for a country’s law, as well as its cultural and social life. While some Muslims believe this, many do not. Islamist extremists believe violence is acceptable to achieve these ends. al-Qaeda is one of many Islamist extremist groups.”
No, I agree with CAIR. We should remove the terms.
Replace ‘Islamic extremist’ with ‘run of the mill Islamist’
Seems appropriate to me...
Hey, CAIR... I lost a relative on 9/11. Just shut yer yappers if you know what’s good for you.
Absolutely, well said.
Bump and sorry to hear that.
“Remove terms such as “Islamist extremism” and “jihadism.”
_____________________________________________________________
We wouldn’t have/need a memorial without these factions.
yup, just declare them normal muslims doing what they normally do. add in benghazi and the latest boko haram incident.
islamist enemies of the United States.
It’s going to be us or them eventually. Hope our faith is strong enough.
so 9/11 was Pilot Error ?
If any concession is made to CAIR with regards to these preposterous demands we must then insist that all references to Christianity be removed from any museum display which concerns the Crusades.
To say that Christianity was in any way responsible for the violence of the Crusades is hate speech.
"Freedom is the sure possession of those alone
who have the courage to defend it."~Pericles
Please support Free Republic
click the pic
When and where did I ever say that?
???????
Oh yes!
I totally agree; most Americans must be willing and able to write up a storm. It is essential.
But not in the way CAIR and company see it.
The documentary film should be modified.
A brief statement should be added either at the beginning or at the end, as follows :
"Certain segments of American Society do not accept the separation of civil and religious authority. Nor do they accept that reality and cognitive dissonance exist.
Their objection to this documentary is duly noted."
Now, can someone wiser than me suggest to whom and where these letters should be addressed?
That's like mindlessly suggesting that asserting that there is a definite link between chickens and eggs, is conflating something transcendentally a fallacy.
Why should we expect more from our Mass Murdering Muslim enemies than we expect from our (twice) elected undocumented president?
Specially when we know that they are virtually totally funded by a hostile foreign country, Saudi Arabia, with funds laundered through a few "laundries" worldwide?
And then there's this. Full documentation inside.
CAIR Fake Membership
The resource cannot be found.
I am very much surprised, given the number affected on 9/11, that CAIR HQ, Hooper, or both have not had any "accidents".
And their mosques are effectively military bases on our soil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
