"The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision
of what is before them, glory and danger alike,
and yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it."~Thucydides
Please support Free Republic
click the pic
Posted on 05/13/2014 1:07:05 PM PDT by Nachum
Deputy Knesset Chairman MK Moshe Feiglin (Likud) outlined his national plan while in Toronto last Tuesday for Israeli Independence Day, speaking at an event sponsored by the Jewish Defense League and Toronto Zionist Council.
Feiglin called for reconnecting the young generation with the knowledge that it is part of a long historical chain from the days of the Patriarch Abraham, and that it is a "light unto the nations" not just in the field of hi-tech, but rather in terms of the values and spiritual message it has for humanity, reports Shalom Toronto.
Feiglin's address at the local Chabad synagogue can be seen here: (video)
At the start of his address, Feiglin praised the establishment of Israel as a divine act, noting how the infant state of Israel defied the odds and repelled numerous trained Arab armies that planned to "finish what (Nazi leader Adolf) Hitler couldn't do."
However, Feiglin noted that the miraculous establishment of Israel remains somewhat lacking, because G-d "didn't want us to be bored."
Feiglin presented an alternate to the "false" peace process, which emphasizes land for peace in Israeli territorial concessions meant to placate the local Arab population.
Throughout history the winning side in war gained land and gave peace to the losing side, whereas modern Israel is being pressed to give land to those who stole it from the beginning and lost in a war meant to destroy the state, argued Feiglin.
A Jewish state, or an Israeli state?
The MK claimed that all of Israel's problems step from a fundamental contradiction between the "Jewish dream" and the "Israeli dream." The Jewish dream follows Abraham's message to be a unique nation, "a people who dwells apart, and not be reckoned among the nations" (Numbers 23:9).
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
"The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision
of what is before them, glory and danger alike,
and yet notwithstanding, go out to meet it."~Thucydides
Please support Free Republic
click the pic
Lunacy: a) the Arabs would never accept it; b) even if they did, it offers the equivalent of dhimmi status (I appreciate the irony); c) in a few years the Arab population would exceed the Jewish population.
They only clear way I see to settle the issue is to draw a fixed boundary, all Jews on one side and all Arabs on the other (as was done in Eastern Europe following WWII).
If the Palestinian Arabs refuse to accept that and still attack Israel, then remove them to the Seychelles or Indonesia.
YEAH! NOW!
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Regarding negation of the right to vote for those who declared war is not in the definition of apartheid the author should have noted residents would vote in local elections, not national. Like residents of America's territories. Either John Kerry doesn't know the Rome Statute defining apartheid, or he doesn't know residents of territories don't vote, or he doesn't mind, by inference, declaring America an apartheid state as Israel would become in his mind. Or all three.
You probably 'meant a remote location like the Seychelles', but bear in mind that the Seychelles are ~90% Christian (predominately Roman Catholic).
The Maldives (the real Maldives, not the ones that B Hussein thinks are in the South Atlantic ;) would be a better choice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
