1 posted on
05/16/2014 5:31:16 AM PDT by
thackney
To: thackney
Because all that existing nuclear waste is safer sitting at the power plants.
2 posted on
05/16/2014 5:35:51 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: thackney
Piggybank for Politicians.
3 posted on
05/16/2014 5:37:08 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: thackney
5 posted on
05/16/2014 5:37:24 AM PDT by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: thackney
6 posted on
05/16/2014 5:37:24 AM PDT by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: thackney
I'm surprised the fund still has money in it.
With all the sticky fingers in government I'm surprised it hasn't been "diverted" to some "green" crony project or another.
7 posted on
05/16/2014 5:39:49 AM PDT by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: thackney
“... The fund now holds $37 billion ...”
-
I suppose that money sits in a lock box alongside the social security fund.
11 posted on
05/16/2014 5:43:54 AM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: FRiends
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
13 posted on
05/16/2014 5:50:21 AM PDT by
deoetdoctrinae
(Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
To: thackney
Wasn’t this fund used to build Yucca Mountain, which is now mothballed, despite the fact that it is geologically the MOST ideal spot for such a thing?
To: thackney
Dont expect a refund, however. The latest Energy Department strategy, laid out in a report last year, is to have a site designed by 2042 and built by 2048 using the money in the fund.Government never losses on these deals. One, does not have to refund the money. Two, will spend the 37 billion between now and then. Three, will be able to impose a new tax for this project since there will not be any money left to build the project and the new tax will be twice as much (or more) then the original tax.
19 posted on
05/16/2014 6:13:31 AM PDT by
Lockbox
To: thackney
By the time a waste repository is built, the stuff will have decayed to the point of being safe.
2042? Nearly 100 years?
21 posted on
05/16/2014 6:26:57 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: thackney
. “The latest Energy Department strategy, laid out in a report last year, is to have a site designed by 2042 and built by 2048 using the money in the fund.”
They will then determine the strategy “woefully underfunded” and will re-instate the fee x ten.
To: thackney
Encase the waste in round glass barrels (there is plenty of sand to make the glass) and sink them in the deep ocean. JMHO
26 posted on
05/16/2014 6:49:16 AM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: thackney
Why not reprocess the waste? Doesn’t France do that?
To: thackney
Now check into phone & utility “fees”...
34 posted on
05/16/2014 8:43:52 AM PDT by
FES0844
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson