Skip to comments.
Fee to build phantom nuke waste site ends
Fuel Fix ^
| May 15, 2014
| Associated Press
Posted on 05/16/2014 5:31:16 AM PDT by thackney
The Energy Department will stop charging the fee by court order on Friday. The amount is only a small percentage of most customers bills, but it adds up to $750 million a year. The fund now holds $37 billion.
The money was collected to build a long-term disposal site for the highly radioactive nuclear waste generated by the nations nuclear power plants that is, by law, the federal governments responsibility.
Dont expect a refund, however. The latest Energy Department strategy, laid out in a report last year, is to have a site designed by 2042 and built by 2048 using the money in the fund.
a typical residential customer pays $2 a year into the fund.
In 2002 Congress approved Nevadas Yucca Mountain as a site for a national nuclear waste dump and $9.5 billion was withdrawn from the fund to develop the project, according to the Government Accountability Office. But the project has been criticized as inadequate and flawed and is fiercely opposed by Nevadans. President Obama, fulfilling a campaign promise, cut funding for the program, withdrew its license application, and dismantled the office that was working on it.
Its a victory for customers, White said of the end of the fee collection. But its bittersweet because wed still rather see a (nuclear waste) site.
(Excerpt) Read more at fuelfix.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
1
posted on
05/16/2014 5:31:16 AM PDT
by
thackney
To: thackney
Because all that existing nuclear waste is safer sitting at the power plants.
2
posted on
05/16/2014 5:35:51 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: thackney
Piggybank for Politicians.
3
posted on
05/16/2014 5:37:08 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: driftdiver
Collecting $37 billion from taxpayers hasn’t made it any safer.
4
posted on
05/16/2014 5:37:21 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: thackney
5
posted on
05/16/2014 5:37:24 AM PDT
by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: thackney
6
posted on
05/16/2014 5:37:24 AM PDT
by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: thackney
I'm surprised the fund still has money in it.
With all the sticky fingers in government I'm surprised it hasn't been "diverted" to some "green" crony project or another.
7
posted on
05/16/2014 5:39:49 AM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: saganite
Dont expect a refund, however. The latest Energy Department strategy, laid out in a report last year, is to have a site designed by 2042 and built by 2048 using the money in the fund.
In other words, "We spent the money and are kicking the can down the road till most of you are dead".
8
posted on
05/16/2014 5:41:40 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: cripplecreek
Boy oh boy is that true, but it did fund some really really great parties.
Who the heck makes these decisions and why aren’t they ever tarred and feathered?
9
posted on
05/16/2014 5:41:43 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
I’ve complained about this scam a couple of times in recent months but underestimated the amount be nearly half.
10
posted on
05/16/2014 5:43:19 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: thackney
“... The fund now holds $37 billion ...”
-
I suppose that money sits in a lock box alongside the social security fund.
11
posted on
05/16/2014 5:43:54 AM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: Repeal The 17th
And highway funds, don’t forget the highway funds that are safely tucked away.
Its really sad how some get so upset by leaders in Ukraine and elsewhere stealing money when they’re nothing but petty thieves compared to our government.
12
posted on
05/16/2014 5:48:19 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin.)
To: FRiends
Click the Pic
Support Free Republic
13
posted on
05/16/2014 5:50:21 AM PDT
by
deoetdoctrinae
(Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
To: cripplecreek
They are probably just upset that they are missing a great opportunity.
14
posted on
05/16/2014 5:52:31 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: thackney
Wasn’t this fund used to build Yucca Mountain, which is now mothballed, despite the fact that it is geologically the MOST ideal spot for such a thing?
To: BitWielder1
:: I’m surprised the fund still has money in it. ::
I’m surprised that a good FReeper like BitWielder1 believes that the funding exists beyond a paper-chase-account.
16
posted on
05/16/2014 6:00:54 AM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The Acronym explains the science.)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
You got me there :)
17
posted on
05/16/2014 6:03:12 AM PDT
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: cripplecreek
So they spent $9.5 Billion on Yucca Mountain. Built a huge underground facility with massive infrastructure and have now abandoned it.
I guess the one good thing is this money was spent in this country vs sending it to Pakistan.
18
posted on
05/16/2014 6:04:49 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: thackney
Dont expect a refund, however. The latest Energy Department strategy, laid out in a report last year, is to have a site designed by 2042 and built by 2048 using the money in the fund.Government never losses on these deals. One, does not have to refund the money. Two, will spend the 37 billion between now and then. Three, will be able to impose a new tax for this project since there will not be any money left to build the project and the new tax will be twice as much (or more) then the original tax.
19
posted on
05/16/2014 6:13:31 AM PDT
by
Lockbox
To: driftdiver
Keep things in perspective. The DOE spent $9.5 billion over 30 years on Yucca Mtn. only to have Obama kill it because he wanted Harry Reid re-elected and Gregory Jaczko named NRC Chairman. As much a waste as that is, compare it to the gummint spending $80 billion in one year alone on food stamps for people who evidently can't (won't) feed themselves or their families. At least the people who worked on Yucca Mtn. paid for their own food (I know I did).
20
posted on
05/16/2014 6:21:22 AM PDT
by
chimera
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson