Posted on 05/19/2014 12:31:44 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
In the wake of this week’s NBA proposed lifetime ban and $2.5 million fine for Donald Sterling, a longtime reader reminded me that I’d written about another NBA owner, a Black man, who held a party in which Whites were refused entry and turned away. And, yet, the NBA did nothing.
As Americas Feedom Fighters already pointed out, Black racism and bigotry against Whites, Jews, Mormons, and gays is tolerated by the NBA.
But a private racist conversation by a White owner is not. And here is an instance of a Black then-NBA owner whose public, deliberate racism was tolerated and ignored. Jay-Z a/k/a Shawn Carter was an owner of the Brooklyn Nets, an NBA Team, from 2003 through mid-April 2013. But, as I noted on this site, in February 2010, Jay-Z held a lavish party at the Merah club in central London, and banned White people from attending. The party, for music industry executives, reporters, and other Jay-Z ass-kissers was for Blacks only. Bouncers were instructed to refuse entry to Whites.
Reader Chris reminded me that I’d written about this, and noted:
“Wasn’t Jay-Z part owner of Brooklyn/New Jersey Nets when he threw that racist party you wrote about? I don’t remember any NBA controversy over that.”
I don’t either, but here’s a reminder from my 2010 post, “More Obama ‘Post-Racialism’ Courtesy of Jay-Z“:
“Jay-Z was caught up in a race row when bouncers at his BRITs after-showparty “banned” white people from boozing with the star. Chart legend Jay-Z threw a lavish bash but music industry executives, journalists and revellers were turned away from the roped-off area because of the color of their skin.” “Minders were spotted banning clubbers from the private event because they were not “of color”. . . . One clubber said: “The security guards were happy to let in all party-goers apart from the white people.”
“Jay-Z was caught up in a race row when bouncers at his BRITs after-showparty “banned” white people from boozing with the star. Chart legend Jay-Z threw a lavish bash but music industry executives, journalists and revellers were turned away from the roped-off area because of the color of their skin.” “Minders were spotted banning clubbers from the private event because they were not “of color”. . . . One clubber said: “The security guards were happy to let in all party-goers apart from the white people.”
Again, this was a deliberate, public, racist act by a Black NBA owner, as opposed to a private telephone conversation. I wonder how many current NBA owners would keep their teams if we heard everything they say in private. Probably none.
And remember, this is Jay-Z, who was a drug dealer, shot his own brother, and stabbed a record executive in 1999. He was indicted in 2000 over the stabbing and was given a plead deal in which he was allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor.
Click like if you are tired of the hypocrisy
Yet, the NBA had no problem with this racist, violent thug owning a team. Because, hey, he’s Black!
Did Donald Sterling (who is a jerk, but so is Jay-Z and so are many NBA owners) ever stab anyone? Shoot anyone? Deal drugs? Ban Blacks from his NBA games with security guards turning them away based on skin color?
Nope.
Can’t be racist because he has no power to impose his racism on others...
right?
Black privilege.
Correct, Sterling can, ironicallt, claim disparate treatment and racial discrimination. He’s a scumbag, but he’s not stupid.
Not only that, by digging in and refusing to accept the penalty, he’s going to force the NBA to sue him. Which makes him the defendent and opens up all sorts of doors to conducting highly invasive discovery.
As an owner, her certainly knows where a lot of bodies are buried, and can point his lasers in the right direction. And can hire an army of PIs to dig out stuff as well.
Given how much dirty laundry he can expose, the NBA and Liberals may very well rue the day they went after him.
AND they really have to be careful with the whole White Privilege/Blacks can’t be Racist thing. Most people, if they’ve even heard of it, haven’t been deeply exposed to it and don’t take it seriously. This could make the old Silent Majority sit up, take notice and drive a major backlash.
Don’t you know Blacks can’t be racist? [/sarc]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.