Replies

You are determined, just determined, to find fault with the man and miss my earlier point, that going out too early with a substantive plan is to court guaranteed destruction in the minds of the low-info voters before it even has a chance to garner support. Timing is vitally important.

So instead we're supposed to vote for the person with no plan and no positions and just hope for the best? I guess low-info voters make up the whole electorate in your view.

I've read what the man has to say already, on health care and an number of other issues, I'm not impressed. Dr. Carson appears to be a fine man and I'm sure he was an excellent doctor, but if he's really looking for something to fill his time in retirement then I suggest he take up golf rather than run for the presidency.

So instead we're supposed to vote for the person with no plan and no positions and just hope for the best?

You have never acknowledged the strategic reasons I have put forth two or three times. You are wringing your hands about whether to vote for him, but the election is more than two years away and he isn't even nominated yet. There haven't been debates yet. If he put all his goods out there now, the so-called "leading" GOP candidates could as easily swipe his ideas as the left could denounce them. He is strategically correct in holding back until the debates. But your mind (?) is made up!!!!

That is why I have suggested that you are biased. So I won't be posting to you any further.