Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid: Letís pass immigration reform now and wait for President Cruz to enforce it in 2017
Hotair ^ | 05/22/2014 | AllahPundit

Posted on 05/22/2014 1:11:34 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Dude, I think we should take this deal.

House Republicans must act on immigration. If they falsely believe Obama won't enforce it, then let's have the law take effect in 2017.

— Senator Harry Reid (@SenatorReid) May 22, 2014

If Republicans don't trust President Obama to enforce a new immigration law, let's give them a chance to implement it under President Cruz.

— Senator Harry Reid (@SenatorReid) May 22, 2014

If that sounds familiar, it’s because Chuck Schumer floated the same idea back in February, minus the trollishly sarcastic reference to President Cruz. It’s a clever way of calling Boehner’s bluff when he complains that Republicans can’t pass anything until Obama proves that he can be trusted to faithfully execute new border-security laws. No problem, say Reid and Schumer; we’ll add a provision to the new law that says it doesn’t take effect until January 20, 2017. That solves your Obama problem in one fell swoop and leaves it to the next president. And if Republicans balk at that idea, Dems can point to it as proof that not only is the “we don’t trust Obama” excuse bogus but that the GOP evidently has little confidence that it’ll be back in the White House in 2017. Beyond all that, Reid and Schumer know a dirty little secret about Republicans: Even if 2016 produced a huge red wave, with Ted Cruz in the White House and the GOP in charge of both houses of Congress, they wouldn’t dare repeal an amnesty bill that passed this year. They might “tweak” it a bit to further beef up security measures or extend the path to citizenship marginally, but there’s no earthly way a party that’s desperate to appeal to Latinos is going to pull the rug out from under them later by rescinding its big outreach gesture on immigration. And that’s why, I think, Reid pointedly mentioned Cruz in his tweet. Even if you righties got your dream candidate, he’s saying, he’s going to let you down on amnesty too.

So why, if this is such a clever play, haven’t Reid and Schumer been more insistent in pushing it over the last three months? Because, I suspect, their own base is too dumb and too impatient to back them up on it. They don’t want to wait until 2017; these are the same people, remember, who’ve convinced themselves that Obama is the “deporter-in-chief” despite ample evidence to the contrary. The White House is sufficiently worried about losing them that O’s on the brink of using executive action to soften DHS’s deportation policy, a risky move that could shatter Boehner’s hopes of passing an immigration bill for good. If amnesty fans breathed into a paper bag and took a hard look at the political landscape, they’d see that everything’s in their favor. Demographic shifts in the electorate have left the GOP petrified of opposing reform indefinitely; in fact, I bet Reid and Schumer suspect that even if a bill passed now that delayed enforcement until 2017, Dems might be able to demagogue congressional Republicans later into agreeing to speed up implementation so that it begins sooner. If Democrats started pounding the table in, say, January 2016, screaming that legalization and “coming out of the shadows” simply can’t wait another year to begin, how many Republicans would swallow hard, imagining a huge Latino backlash in November of that year if the GOP puts up a fight, and agree to go along? For all the blather about conservatives tying Boehner’s hands, soft-headed lefties who aren’t as strategically sharp as Reid and Schumer are making their lives harder too.

In case there’s any doubt of the magnitude of Reid’s trollishness in his tweet, here he is last year commenting on the prospect of President Cruz.

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: harryreid; immigrationreform; tedcruz

1 posted on 05/22/2014 1:11:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you will allow amnesty now, we will gladly close the border in 2017.


2 posted on 05/22/2014 1:12:54 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

FUHR


3 posted on 05/22/2014 1:13:37 PM PDT by kingattax (America needs more real Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Two million dollars, Harry. Two million dollars.

4 posted on 05/22/2014 1:13:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sorry, but I’m not willing to bet the country on a GOP WH win in 2016. Not by a long shot.....


5 posted on 05/22/2014 1:19:12 PM PDT by clintonh8r (I wish no harm on Gen. Shinseki, but perhaps he should consider seppuku.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

This makes no sense.

If Harry really wants a Republican president to enforce such a law, let’s wait for the Republican congress and Republican president elected in 2016, pass legislation on this in 2017.


6 posted on 05/22/2014 1:24:04 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Let’s pass immigration reform now

Let's not.

7 posted on 05/22/2014 1:25:26 PM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Given that the GOP seems to be running on “Look, we’re not Democrats” I am not expecting the GOP to win in 2016.


8 posted on 05/22/2014 1:28:17 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The nut ball speaks again, Who said Cruz would be president?


9 posted on 05/22/2014 1:31:05 PM PDT by Vinylly (?%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Harry should know that, thanks to Resident Obama, presidents no longer have to enforce laws they don’t like.


10 posted on 05/22/2014 1:31:58 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The ¬ďfourth estate¬Ēhas morphed into a 5th column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
That's The Ticket !!!


11 posted on 05/22/2014 1:35:06 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The ¬ďfourth estate¬Ēhas morphed into a 5th column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Got a better idea.

Give us skeptics everything we want - secure border, immigration enforcement, fining employers of illegal aliens, etc. (all the things in the original amnesty bill!) and we’ll TALK about amnesty.


12 posted on 05/22/2014 1:36:25 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If they concede to Ted Cruz,I am all for it.

You wouldn’t LIE, would you Harry??????


13 posted on 05/22/2014 1:38:05 PM PDT by Cyman (We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A Marine was shackled and sedated in a Mexican jail after missing his exit. He’s not the first one. Now he’s paraded on TV so all can see he’s at least still alive.

America shouldn’t be interested in even considering immigration issues until our Marine is returned to us. Then, we only immigration issues in light of how our own citizens are treated in Mexico.


14 posted on 05/22/2014 1:43:52 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I approve of passing small, narrow laws that stand on their own over the next two years. Otherwise, with the massive corruption and lawlessness of today’s FedGov, I can’t imagine any reason to pass any large laws unless they repeal the many bad laws on the books (not repeal and replace, just repeal until we have an executive branch that will follow the law and the Constitution as written).


15 posted on 05/22/2014 1:45:45 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Day Immigration Reform Died | Commentary

http://cdn.rollcall.com/news/the_day_immigration_reform_died_commentary-233225-1.html?popular=true&cdn_load=true&zkPrintable=1&nopagination=1


16 posted on 05/22/2014 2:18:33 PM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Harry: You like President Cruz, too? I’ll take a President Cruz over a President Fauxcahontis, a President Hillary or a President Patrick any day.


17 posted on 05/22/2014 2:20:48 PM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExCTCitizen

Hopefully a President Cruz would not enforce it.


18 posted on 05/22/2014 2:23:12 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No shamnesty, not now, not ever.


19 posted on 05/22/2014 9:48:03 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
They might “tweak” it a bit to further beef up security measures or extend the path to citizenship marginally, but there’s no earthly way a party that’s desperate to appeal to Latinos is going to pull the rug out from under them later by rescinding its big outreach gesture on immigration.

I think that should be "desperate to appeal to illegal latrinos". Most AMERICANS of Hispanic origin do not like illegal latrinos.

Stop conflating ILLEGAL F'N ALIENS with Americans of Hispanic origin.

20 posted on 05/23/2014 1:19:06 PM PDT by jimt (Fear is the darkroom where negatives are developed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson