[Cringing Negativism Network]

Well I don’t agree completely, but here’s another link from your apparently favorite site:

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LeftFielder

I don’t think my post was however a left field post. I believe I do focus on American jobs - but I do that because both parties are 100% sold out about moving US jobs to other countries - have been for many years.

As I said earlier in this post, I responded to the original post because it was about Ted Cruz.

I believe Ted Cruz has a very huge significance in America.

I believe he may be America’s president.

So I believe any topic about Ted Cruz automatically becomes one I might respond to. You pick Ted Cruz to talk about, you get a whole lot of messages back.

Now I admit I am more concerned than just about anyone else on this site, about China absorbing all of our jobs.

That may be because I have been there and worked there, and I recognize what this means.

China is overtaking America.

I believe this is HUGELY important, and I believe America needs to change our way of dealing with China, before China simply takes over the entire world.

Admitedly this means, I focus on China more than most do. However most have their heads in the sand about China.

China now makes more than America makes. And that is rapidly growing.

So I talk about it.

Nobody else does.

Until we get more involved in our own country’s future, that is what the deal is.

But if you’ve got to use one of your posts, I believe that one above is closer.

I’m not trying to disrupt things totally. I merely am trying to say some things, which apparently put me on the opposite side from quite a few people on this site.

So be it.

Again, here is the link to the site you like to reference, with another link:

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LeftFielder

I don’t completely agree with that, but it’s closer.

[noinfringers2]

The shakers and movers of today’s USA have managed to put the remarkable capabilities of the USA, at least as once was, between the rock of backwardness of Islam for oil and the hard spot of Chinese cleverness for industrial expansion and goods.

[Luircin]

I think it’s less that people are disagreeing with you, and more that it’s getting tiresome to see it from you on every single page, even on topics that don’t have anything to do with jobs.

Especially since you’re not really offering any kind of solution that we can do right now. All I’ve seen you proposing is a tariff, but even if I was to accept that was a good start, how do you propose to get it passed?