Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

V. Stiviano taunted Sterling via text days before his rants went public
New York Post ^ | May 25, 2014 | David K. Li

Posted on 05/24/2014 9:49:11 PM PDT by canuck_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
There's the motive.
1 posted on 05/24/2014 9:49:11 PM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

She wasn’t just “bringing men to the games”, but to his luxury box. That might tend to tick a guy off.


2 posted on 05/24/2014 9:57:48 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
"V. Stiviano taunted Sterling via text days before his rants went public..."

.... I know the race-baters know for a fact that this whole thing wasn't a setup but rather pure racism .... but this sure sounds like a setup.

3 posted on 05/24/2014 10:45:21 PM PDT by R_Kangel ( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

I’m waiting for the NBA to be issuing an apology to Donald Sterling any minute now.


4 posted on 05/24/2014 11:01:15 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
Here's why this is going no-where. Sterling is protecting her for some reason.

Did V. Stiviano commit a crime when recording Donald Sterling?(California Recording Law) Digital Media Law page ^ | 4/29/2015

5 posted on 05/24/2014 11:42:38 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. I won. ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

I never understood the idea that people could ‘demand’ the return of gifts. The only gift that I think of being owed in return is an engagement ring when a woman breaks off an engagement.


6 posted on 05/24/2014 11:51:44 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Like everything these days a “he’s racist” rules the day and makes news. Now being a racist is calling someone black


7 posted on 05/25/2014 3:25:48 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

If you havent seen her interview with Dr. Phil, try to find it online. Very telling how she answers the questions. He gets her to contradict her statements on several occasions. Her motives are petty clear by the end. Shes half golddigger half crazy IMO. Also has had multiple aliases. .....Freakin little grifter.


8 posted on 05/25/2014 3:35:21 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

I would love to see this attention whore put under oath and asked a bevy of straight questions —


9 posted on 05/25/2014 4:40:00 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

> I would love to see this attention whore put under oath and asked a bevy of straight questions —

I wonder how any others she’s dug her claws into. They’ don’t call them “gold diggers” for nothing.


10 posted on 05/25/2014 4:49:37 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I dated a “Christian” woman (I might add she was quite stunning) who shared with me she kept an engagement ring from a previous relationship. Her reasoning was it was proper etiquette.

She then asked me to take photos to help her sell it as she knew I had a very high-end camera.

That caught my attention. Big time. To me, it was like looking into her heart and seeing her character...or lack thereof.

I began to understand why she had been divorced twice.

Our relationship ended shortly after that moment.

Thank God!


11 posted on 05/25/2014 5:29:36 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

I’d say if the guy breaks the engagement, it’s hers.

But if she breaks the engagement, it goes right back to the guy.


12 posted on 05/25/2014 5:34:40 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Let me summon some indignation and sympathy for Don.

Nope. Don’t have any.

He’s an idiot for putting himself in this situation. Did he really think she cared for him?


13 posted on 05/25/2014 5:40:40 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

The ring could have been in his family.

In addition, she had no moral right to keep it regardless of who broke the engagement.

If the woman keeps the ring, that’s the same as stealing. Absolutely no moral reason for her to keep it...especially if she was planning to sell it.

No twisting of reality can change morality.


14 posted on 05/25/2014 5:44:45 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
I say if the guy breaks the engagement, it's hers. But if she breaks the engagement, it goes right back to the guy

I agree with you, with one caveat. If the gal keeps that ring, it's for sentimental reasons or memories, not to be sold or used by someone else.

Other gifts shouln't be returned or asked for, unless someone wants to return them.

15 posted on 05/25/2014 5:56:48 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

I disagree. The idea that a man “gives” an engagement ring to a woman as a promise of marriage, breaks that promise, and somehow is due the ring back means that she’s just renting out her finger for his claim on her as long as she so interests him. That is gross and creepy.


16 posted on 05/25/2014 5:57:36 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Rather sad you missed the morality aspect...


17 posted on 05/25/2014 5:59:37 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: grania

That’d be a sorry sentiment—holding onto a ring from someone who had humiliated her like that.

I think once any gift is given, it’s within the recipient’s right to do as he or she pleases with it. Perhaps she’ll find herself in a situation where she desperately needs the money for herself or a loved one.

Now, it actually might help her to reach closure and move on if she returned the ring to him, and that may be a noble gesture on her part. But I don’t consider it an obligation.


18 posted on 05/25/2014 6:00:38 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

You seem to miss the morality aspect of that which is given—and that which somehow you think is conditionally given, dependent upon the changing mood of the giver.


19 posted on 05/25/2014 6:01:31 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I’d say if the guy breaks the engagement, it’s hers.

But if she breaks the engagement, it goes right back to the guy.
_______________

Legally a ring is consideration to bind a contract and returns to the owner if the contract is broken. I think there have been a number of court rulings to this effect.


20 posted on 05/25/2014 6:03:18 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson