Meh. Dismissed for procedural issues only. Not a “victory” for us by any means.
Well, it’s a victory in that, these lesbians are pissed off at what happened. They are having a hissy fit even as we speak, that the State Supreme Court didn’t naturally see the need for homosexual marriage, without the need to go through other proceedings.
The 10th Amendmendment automatically reserves "government" power to legislatively address marriage issues uniquely to the states, not the federal government.
The states can make laws which discriminate against constitutionally unprotected gay agenda issues, marriage in this example. But such laws cannot also unreasonably abridge constitutionally enumerated rights.
The reason that the courts are deciding cases in favor of the gay agenda is the following imo. Pro-gay activist judges have infiltrated the courts and are wrongly legislating gay rights from the bench.
A remedy to this situation is the following. Patriots need to work with both their state and federal lawmakers to make the following laws. Judges need to be required to promptly, clearly and publicly reference all constitutional clauses which Constitution-knowledgeable voters would reasonably accept as justification to case decisions.
And in cases where the Constitution is silent about a particular issue, judges need to be required to likewise state that the issue is a 10th Amendment-protected state power issue.
Exactly. But a slight procedural delay in the unending march to Hell in a Handbasket gives the optimists among us reason to believe it’s not all going to end the way it is all going to end.