Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kaboom! State Dept. finally gives explosive answer
WND ^ | May 27, 2014 | Steve Peacock

Posted on 05/27/2014 6:04:19 PM PDT by Steve Peacock

Bureau boss overseeing shipments has Benghazi connections

The State Department bureau tasked with secretly sending to embassies plastic and liquid explosives operates under the guidance of Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy, whom a congressional panel last year separately found to be largely responsible for security lapses in Benghazi, WND has learned.

A series of WND articles recently exposed the purchase and international transport of many hundreds of pounds of plastic, sheet and linear explosives along with thousands of containers of high-energy liquid explosives.

Weeks after a State official laughed in response to WND’s inquiry, the department belatedly reacted to a follow-up request for information about how, where and by whom the blasting equipment will be used.

The inquiry sought to determine whether, as contracting documents indicate, State will ship the bombing equipment globally through its Sterling, Virginia-based Diplomatic Pouch and Mail facility, or DPM. It’s the primary government facility by which secure pouches and crates are sent to U.S. embassies and consulates.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; explosives; freeploader; statedept
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: SolidRedState

“...As incompetent as this administration is, I doubt they can ship rubber bands and paper clips securely and keep track of them.”
**********************************************************************
Right, the Obama regime operatives will likely ship the plastic explosives with the detonators in the same package so it will be easier to keep track of.

What could possibly go wrong?


21 posted on 05/27/2014 7:55:50 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

There was an undying rumor that the Rooskies had assembled one in the DC embassy after years and years of painstaking assembly of parts from diplomatic pouches. This would be much trickier to do today because the detection equipment is so much better. I would, of course, assume that we had done the same thing in the Moscow embassy.


22 posted on 05/27/2014 8:07:17 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steve Peacock

These people are not accountable, hence the incompetence. The country is rudderless because the GOP is too stupid and gutless to make the point.

PC and making nice with Zero is going to kill us. I seem to remember in the Army of examples like these.


23 posted on 05/27/2014 9:27:42 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockpile

Also, certainly these items are NOT travelling aboard commercial airliners are they?
***************************
I hear they have a contract with Malaysian Air.


24 posted on 05/28/2014 4:12:15 AM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
What use do embassies have for things like this, if not for equipping terrorists and suicide bombers.

They're used for blowing crypto gear and other classified/sensitive equipment (including weaponry that the embassy may have on-hand) in the event the Embassy/Consulate is successfully breached by an enemy force.

You may recall that when that Navy EP-3 Aires (spy version of the P-3 Orion) was forced down into China in the early days of the Bush 43 Administration, the crew was unable to complete the destruction of the gear because they were using hammers.

Cooking off high explosives inside an aircraft is, obviously, not a good idea. But using it to destroy equipment in the secure rooms inside a building is very much a preferable option.
25 posted on 05/28/2014 4:21:46 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson