In all fairness, the 12 of 12 were the triers of fact. The appeals court was about the law or in their opinion, the misapplication of it.
However, don’t you believe those issues had been raised at the trial court level?
You know as well as I do these issues were raised there. They were stricken down there for some reason.
One of the appeals court judges saw right through this.
What it boils down to is one judge making the swing decision here. In a three person setting like this, it should have to be unanimous. I don’t think this was justice. I hope it is appealed.