Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suffolk boy, 13, charged in alleged "sextortion" case
The Virginian-Pilot ^ | May 28, 2014 | Scott Daugherty

Posted on 05/29/2014 7:49:39 AM PDT by csvset

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Red Badger

He should be transferred to the Bill Clinton school.


21 posted on 05/29/2014 8:29:54 AM PDT by ruesrose (The Anchor Holds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Yah! Play stupid games win stupid prizes.


22 posted on 05/29/2014 8:30:01 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

She is a product of this culture and the schools these days usually teach sex-ed that its all okay.

We used to complain that schools taught “if it feels good, do it”, now they teach “just do it and not doing it is a bad thing”


23 posted on 05/29/2014 8:31:12 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Oh yeah, I expect a bus driver to be akin to a captain of a boat at sea.

The captain of a boat at sea can legally detain a person until the boat is docked and the proper authorities are there to take over.


24 posted on 05/29/2014 8:32:08 AM PDT by envisio (Its on like Donkey Kong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: envisio

Well, if you expect bus drivers to be paid like ship captains . . . .


25 posted on 05/29/2014 8:33:34 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The solution is to require the teachers to ride the bus too.


26 posted on 05/29/2014 8:35:51 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru

Using Elliot Roger as an example, the feminists are saying that boys are “taught” to abuse females. In this case, the boy was 13 years old, which means he should have started school around 2007. So, when did someone start teaching him to be abusive to females? When did someone “teach” the girl to send him nude photos? And who exactly are the people teaching 13 year olds to behave this way? C’mon feminists, you’re so smart, you tell US!


27 posted on 05/29/2014 8:37:48 AM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Durus
The story doesn't really say. Perhaps he videoed the oral sex? As far as her e-mailing nude images of her self, I'm not sure where the law stands on that.

Perhaps the boy's defense team could say she was soliciting. Either way, these children are idiots. No internet for you, for 1 year !

28 posted on 05/29/2014 8:38:32 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: csvset
a student at John F. Kennedy Middle School

The only thing more fitting would be if the illegal sex acts took place at William Clinton Middle School.

29 posted on 05/29/2014 8:42:25 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
Contact Suffolk Public Schools

Splendid idea. The boy should wag his finger and say, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman..."

30 posted on 05/29/2014 8:51:17 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

5% Carry 100% of Free Republic Expense


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR

31 posted on 05/29/2014 8:56:25 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Three fingers of Jack and two raw eggs in a glass.That’s a real morning eye-opener.


32 posted on 05/29/2014 9:03:08 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

No because she is a girl. Girls are too stupid to make their own decisions about their bodies. They are weak, feeble, and easily coerced. They are always the victim and the male is always the perpetrator, hence the boy being charged with child porn and the girl being innocent.

while this kid is definitely a creep, the girl is guilty of creating child porn and equality demands she be charged. Ignorance is not a defense but I guess having a vagina is. We are told women are equal to men yet somehow they get the advantage of playing stupid victim in court. You can be a strong leader and a stupid victim at the same time.


33 posted on 05/29/2014 9:03:26 AM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drunknsage

There was a case in PA involving a boy and girls exchanging pics and the boy then sending them to others, and the girls involved WERE charged and convicted, as I recall.


34 posted on 05/29/2014 9:13:16 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: drunknsage

She was blackmailed.


35 posted on 05/29/2014 9:34:08 AM PDT by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: goldi
"Blackmailed" by the existence of nude photos she took and distributed herself.

Just as it's nearly impossible to cheat an honest man, it's nearly impossible to blackmail a girl who's not an attention-seeking little slut.

36 posted on 05/29/2014 9:39:53 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: csvset

“...a 13-year-old boy blackmailed...”

He’s racist! Call Al “Notso” Sharpton and the Revrund Jacksun quick!


37 posted on 05/29/2014 9:43:23 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset

Assuming the story is correct (and that the girls aren’t just making up stories, which has been known to happen), the boy is a little creep and a potential future sexual predator. Or, as someone else mentioned, possible future politician/CEO material.

The girls involved have presumably learned their lesson about the costs of their naivety and/or stupidity. Other girls (and boys) need to be made aware of the stupidity and potential dangers of taking and distributing nude photos of themselves.

The mind really boggles. I can’t imagine any girl that I knew in junior high or high school allowing nude pictures of themselves to be taken (of course, “selfies” used to be more difficult, and pictures had to be processed by strangers, back in the film days) and distributed. I still can’t imagine what would make a young woman think that this was in any way a good idea.


38 posted on 05/29/2014 9:47:22 AM PDT by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like tractor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
Just as it's nearly impossible to cheat an honest man, it's nearly impossible to blackmail a girl who's not an attention-seeking little slut.

Joe Francis, Larry Flynt, and nearly every porn producer in the San Fernando Valley are racing to get her phone #.

39 posted on 05/29/2014 9:53:28 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"The solution is to require the teachers to ride the bus too."

Yeah, because teachers really want to have to deal with screaming, unruly kids for an hour more or so after having to deal with their attitudes and behavior all day long...

Also, doing so would negate the ability to stay after school to assist any students who need extra help.

Your suggestion is not tenable...

40 posted on 05/29/2014 10:12:21 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly ("Discarded fetuses for power? Hitler may have lost the battle, but he won the war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson