Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Supreme Court tosses out Nautilus loss in patent fight
Reuters ^ | 06/02/2014 | Staff

Posted on 06/02/2014 9:24:10 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday threw out a lower court decision in a patent fight over heart rate monitors, a decision that will affect other patent infringement fights.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: patents; scotus
Implications for patent infringement trolls.
1 posted on 06/02/2014 9:24:10 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

2 posted on 06/02/2014 9:25:53 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Is this a double negative or triple negative ??

What does this mean to the real world.


3 posted on 06/02/2014 9:27:41 AM PDT by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

It means that you had better write patent applications better if you want to stifle competition and innovation.


4 posted on 06/02/2014 9:38:29 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

It means that SCOTUS vacated (and remanded) the Federal Circuit’s opinion. Biosig won and Nautilus lost in the Federal Circuit.


5 posted on 06/02/2014 9:38:49 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Eh?!
The FReepathon Is Stil Running?!
Yes!
Donate!



6 posted on 06/02/2014 9:50:04 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I didn't read it but my first thought is that it would be a mistake to piss of Captain Nemo, especially with our navy in such a weakened state....
7 posted on 06/02/2014 9:57:12 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“We conclude that the Federal Circuit’s formulation, which tolerates some ambiguous claims but not others, does not satisfy the statute’s definiteness requirement. In place of the “insolubly ambiguous” standard, we hold that a patent is invalid for indefiniteness if its claims, read in light of the specification delineating the patent, and the prosecu­tion history, fail to inform, with reasonable certainty, those skilled in the art about the scope of the invention.”

I gather it means one cannot write a vague patent, and then claim anyone who infringes on the principles is violating your patent. But that is just my guess...

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-369_k53m.pdf


8 posted on 06/02/2014 10:16:22 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I sooooo miss America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

That was my take also. Gotta be able to show a specific infringement not a general/vague infringement.


9 posted on 06/02/2014 10:26:07 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Looks like all this means is that the Federal Circuit’s new rule that a claim can have some ambiguity short of total ambiguity is tossed out. The law remains essentially the same, and it’s remanded.


10 posted on 06/02/2014 11:24:26 AM PDT by Freeping Since 2001 (Since 2001. Seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Look for longer patents as some description or example is provided for every element of every claim. Big picture - reading the claim element in dispute - “spaced relationship” should have been easily understood by one skilled in the art when comparing the claimed invention to the prior art.

Short conclusion - costs for patent preparation just went up.


11 posted on 06/02/2014 1:06:58 PM PDT by LibertyOh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All


Less Than $100 To Go!!
Even George Would Be Shocked
To Find Some FReepers
Haven't Donated To FR This Quarter!
Every Dollar Helps!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


12 posted on 06/02/2014 1:08:51 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson