Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House outlines legal rationale for Bowe Bergdahl swap
The Washington Times ^ | June 3, 2014 | BY SUSAN CRABTREE

Posted on 06/03/2014 6:06:41 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

The White House is providing a detailed defense of its decision to swap Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five senior leaders of the Taliban without notifying Congress first.

National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden on Tuesday morning said the administration determined that the federal statute requiring the administration to give Congress 30-days notice before transferring a detainee from Guantanamo Bay to a foreign country did not apply to the Bergdahl case because it was a "unique set of circumstances."

“The administration determined that the notification requirement should be construed not to apply to this unique set of circumstances, in which the transfer would secure the release of a captive U.S. soldier and the secretary of Defense, acting on behalf of the president, has determined that providing notice as specified in the statute could endanger the soldier’s life,” Hayden said in a statement.

In this case, she said, delaying the transfer in order to provide the 30-day notice would “interfere with the executive’s performance of two related functions that the Constitution assigns to the president: protecting the lives of Americans abroad and protecting U.S. soldiers.”

“Because such interference would significantly alter the balance between Congress and the President, and could even raise constitutional concerns, we believe it is fair to conclude that Congress did not intend that the administration would be barred from taking the action it did in these circumstances,” she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bergdahl; traitor; tyranny
How is releasing 5 Taliban commanders, "protecting the lives of Americans abroad and protecting U.S. soldiers"?

Lies.

1 posted on 06/03/2014 6:06:41 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
My bet is Bergdahl is planning to return to Afghanistan ASAP.
2 posted on 06/03/2014 6:10:37 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Liars, liars, all of them.

The Obama administration did an end around on Congress for this prisoner exchange because they knew that Congress would not approve and that would jeopardize Bergdahl’s life.

Bergdahl needs to face a Court-martial and and Obama needs to face an independent prosecutor. The chance of either are slim.


3 posted on 06/03/2014 6:14:31 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
My bet is Bergdahl is planning to return to Afghanistan ASAP.

You'll notice that President Kharzai was not amused at this stunt.

The military knew exactly where this POS deserter was for years. They had already wasted at least 6 lives trying to find him and when they finally did find him, they had no interest in mounting a rescue attempt.

You don't rescue traitors. But now hundreds, if not thousands of Americans are much less secure with these 5 terrorists and one potential corroborator being loosed upon the world.

4 posted on 06/03/2014 6:15:16 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It is time for we the people to rise up against this lawless rogue regime.


5 posted on 06/03/2014 6:15:58 AM PDT by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bergdal wasn’t a prisoner and Obama didn’t need to set him free. He just wanted an excuse to set five of his friends free.


6 posted on 06/03/2014 6:16:50 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Is it any wonder that Obama focused on getting an anti-American “soldier” exchanged for 5 anti-American jihadists?

Here’s how you determine what Obama will do - think of what any common sense patriotic American president would do,
and then determine the exact opposite.


7 posted on 06/03/2014 6:16:50 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Some guy was on Fox last night saying it didn't matter that the 5 had been realized because their leadership had been destroyed.

Yeah right, we'll see won't we!

8 posted on 06/03/2014 6:19:24 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’d say if daddy used Allah’s name, sonny boy will soon blow it make himself a martyr “for the cause”.


9 posted on 06/03/2014 6:19:59 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2014/05/22/Congress-rejects-AUMF-sunset-amendment-war-on-terror-to-continue-Guantanamo-still-open/3121400794485/


10 posted on 06/03/2014 6:20:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So the Executive branch gets to interpret the law that Congress passed. Right?

And the Congress bends over yet again? Right?

Clear and Present Danger, anyone?


11 posted on 06/03/2014 6:21:39 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Obammy's toadies say he's special.


12 posted on 06/03/2014 6:21:52 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Sorry “realized should have been released” spell checks fault! :)


13 posted on 06/03/2014 6:22:26 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

How many soldiers died hunting down and capturing these five terrorists?

Has that cost been considered in their release?


14 posted on 06/03/2014 6:23:13 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

“What difference does it make?”

(couldn’t resist) :)


15 posted on 06/03/2014 6:24:43 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Oldeconomybuyer
It will be interesting to see how the media decides to spin this situation.

They will likely say the outrage within the military is intolerance toward Obama and Muslims.

The issue of negotiating with terrorists will be described as "prisoner of war negotiations".

The top secret file on Bergdahl will be "off limits until the investigation of this incident is complete".

The mysterious Bergdahl "health issues" will be described as "personal and confidential".

The non-disclosure documents the military witnesses were forced to sign will be described as "normal operating procedures".

The wild card in this story will be the honor and honesty of the ex-military who were witnesses to this incident. Their willingness to tell the truth will be hard to spin.

17 posted on 06/03/2014 6:33:35 AM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

...and how does the decision to out the Afghanistan CIA chief fall into this rationale?


18 posted on 06/03/2014 6:38:55 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski
The wild card in this story will be the honor and honesty of the ex-military who were witnesses to this incident.

Exactly! This is where the Regime got blind sided - they did not see it coming. Probably thought they had those guys buttoned up with NDA's.

Hope these hero patriots have taken every measure for their protection in every sense of the word.

19 posted on 06/03/2014 6:38:55 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Damned good question.


20 posted on 06/03/2014 6:41:55 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

White House rationale = Oil Water


21 posted on 06/03/2014 6:53:53 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So the President is claiming he doesn’t need to follow the law because of “a unique set of circumstances?” Isn’t every case a unique set of circumstances. Isn’t this just nothing more, really, than the President claiming that he doesn’t EVER have to follow the law?


22 posted on 06/03/2014 7:07:12 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stremba

www.house.gov

www.senate.gov

Call your Congressman and Senators. tell them you consider this an act of treason against the US and the President has now endangered all of America with another 9/11 attack by releasing these dangerous criminals.

Tell them you expect them to uphold their oath to the Constitution.

The President must be impeached and removed from office for this treacherous act. That is the remedy under the constitution.

My reps are all Dems, but they heard from me this morning.

If you do nothing, nothing will change.


23 posted on 06/03/2014 7:07:38 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Maybe Obama’s trying to start a war...


24 posted on 06/03/2014 7:37:29 AM PDT by GOPJ (ObamaCare - like buying a pig in a poke...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
How many soldiers died hunting down and capturing these five terrorists?

How many citizens will die because the top terrorists masterminds have been released?
25 posted on 06/03/2014 8:18:58 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Anything is possible, if you don't know what you're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kidd
...and how does the decision to out the Afghanistan CIA chief fall into this rationale?

Good point.
26 posted on 06/03/2014 8:19:44 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Anything is possible, if you don't know what you're talking about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; P-Marlowe; jazusamo

I do nother believe that there is a tradition of always swapping for our POWs. That is a lie elevated to a myth. We’ve had POWs imprisoned for years.
I keep hearing on the news. ..well, we had to bring him home. No we didn’t vv


27 posted on 06/03/2014 8:28:06 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Unrelenting, blatant LIES! Benghazi, IRS, VA, $6 Billion missing and on and on and on...


28 posted on 06/03/2014 8:35:02 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Does their rational break down this way “Considering all the factors and current presidential disdain of the Constitution.....................................FU!”


29 posted on 06/03/2014 8:44:34 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Legal is one question. Motivation, judgement, competence, risk, are the others.


30 posted on 06/03/2014 8:51:08 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Benghazi)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It is one thing to swap a POW for a POW. In this case, Bergdahl had effectively resigned from the military when he walked off the base with no intention to return. Hence he was at best a kidnap victim and at worst a traitor.

Additionally the prisoners we held in Afghanistan were not captured in Uniform and as such were not POW’s.

This was simply a trade of terrorists for traitors.

The were no POWs here.


31 posted on 06/03/2014 9:05:35 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson