Posted on 06/03/2014 7:57:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The debate continues over the value of the trade executed to return US soldier Bowe Bergdahl from captivity, especially focusing on the circumstances of Bergdahl’s capture. The chair of the Joint Chiefs, General Martin Dempsey, issued a statement today that the Army would indeed investigate those circumstances and the allegations of desertion in due course. Dempsey argued, though, that this question is and should be separate from the duty of the US to get him back from his captors:
The Army will investigate charges that rescued Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl deserted his post in Afghanistan, Joint Chiefs Chairman Martin Dempsey said Tuesday.
“When he is able to provide them, we’ll learn the facts. Like any American, he is innocent until proven guilty,” Dempsey said in a post to his Facebook page. “Our Army’s leaders will not look away from misconduct if it occurred.” …
But Dempsey and other administration officials have looked to separate the rescue effort from questions over Bergdahl’s conduct.
“In response to those of you interested in my personal judgments about the recovery of SGT Bowe Bergdahl, the questions about this particular soldier’s conduct are separate from our effort to recover ANY U.S. service member in enemy captivity,” Dempsey said. “This was likely the last, best opportunity to free him.”
The Hill also notes that the Pentagon concluded that Bergdahl had deserted as far back as 2010:
A Pentagon investigation concluded in 2010 that Bergdahl had walked away from his unit before being captured by the Taliban, the Associated Press reported Tuesday. And according to The New York Times, Bergdahl left a note in his tent saying he was disillusioned with the U.S. Army and did not support the U.S. mission in Afghanistan.
According to the Washington Times and The Blaze, the Army nixed any special operations to retrieve Bergdahl after this conclusion, choosing not to risk the lives of other soldiers in a rescue attempt for a deserter:
Commanders on the ground debated whether to pull the trigger on a rescue several times in recent years, according to one of the sources, a former high-level intelligence official in Afghanistan, who said the conclusion each time was that the prospect of losing highly trained troops was too high a price to pay for rescuing a soldier who walked away from his unit before being captured by the enemy.
A second source told The Washington Times that the rescue operation plans were “high risk” and became even less attractive in recent months when officials in the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command grew convinced that the Taliban and the militant Haqqani network, whose operatives were holding Sgt. Bergdahl, were eager to cut a deal for his release.
“Joint Special Operations Command always had the rescue mission on the table and it was entirely under their ownership, but the big question centered on whether Bergdahl was somebody you risk lives for when you still have time and space to maneuver diplomatically,” said the source, a high-level congressional aide, who, like the former intelligence official, spoke only on the condition of anonymity.
The aide also said there was frustration among some on Capitol Hill that the Obama administration had botched an opportunity to exert leverage over the Taliban, particularly since the U.S. military could have used force to secure Sgt. Bergdahl’s release.
The focus on Bergdahl will probably ease over the next few days, as the bigger issues in the swap are the Obama administration’s lack of compliance with the law and the danger presented by the five Taliban leaders sprung from GITMO. Some of the focus has been on Robert Bergdahl, the father who “immersed himself in Taliban culture,” NBC reported on Today, and who at times seemed to be regurgitating Taliban propaganda on Twitter. His hometown of Hailey, Idaho hopes people will back off for a while now and let residents relax a bit now that the ordeal seems to be over, but questions will persist about the Bergdahls — even if they don’t do so at the top of the headlines:
Good for him. I hope this isn’t just eyewash. Of course, he gives his boss the mandatory pass on the shameful prisoner release. Dempsey is pretty much a disgrace when you consider what’s happened under his command.
It was too risky to rescue the guy so we just traded 5 high value terrorists for him. Real good leadership.
Based on what I saw of this man’s mother and father (a converted Muslim fruitcake), I don’t believe he was ‘captured’.
WATCH FOR MORE OF THESE BLATANT ACTIONS AS ODUMBASS SEES HIS NECK ON THE LINE AFTER 2014
meaning they will do NOTHING
I say the little turncoat bastard has been tasked by the Taliban to pull off some destructive mayhem or other. That’s why they were so “anxious to cut a deal to release him.” And if he’s allowed to walk free among us, even MORE Americans will die due to HIS actions!
It is worse than eyewash. Dempsey is giving himself and others in the chain of command an out when questioned about Bergdahl. When asked a question, Dempsey will say he can't answer since it is under investigation. It is SOP for the Obama administration.
The military and the rest of the federal government has become politicized. Honor and country have gone out the window.
DOD has taken the lead in allowing illegal aliens to join the military. They did something similar with gays in the military.
Of course he wasn’t captured. He went out looking for the Taliban. They don’t keep American military prisoners they kill them. Otherwise there would be more than just Bergdahl. He was working with them.
Just more theatre for the proletariat. Investigating.
They are investigating:
Fast and furious
Benghazi
NSA
IRS
VA
Now this
Add to this mess... Egypt, Libya, almost getting us in a war in Syria and on and on and on and on and on.
You name it and they are “investigating” and “will get to the bottom of it”. Yeah, right.
No hard evidence, just anecdotal hearsay from some former and now disgruntled soldiers. May as well put him in for a CMOH to go with his new stripe. He ought to be sportin’ a whole bunch of stripes on his clothes.
Uh, sure General.
“Our Army’s leaders will not look away from misconduct if it occurred.”
Is that a fact Martin? You will if FUBO tells you to! Dempsey is a disgrace to his uniform! This stuff will go under the rug so fast it will pull a vacuum in the room!
Sadly, I think you’re right. Dempsey is a weasel.
He was conveniently “captured” a couple days before his post was attacked by the Taliban.
Flashback: Attack on U.S. base in eastern Afghanistan kills two soldiers (after Bergdahl deserted)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3163124/posts
Anybody out there trust the briefcase generals?
Anybody think ‘justice’ will get served??
Yeah, me neither.
He was conveniently “captured” a couple days before his post was attacked by the Taliban.
Flashback: Attack on U.S. base in eastern Afghanistan kills two soldiers (after Bergdahl deserted)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3163124/posts
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH ......
Yeh, I wonder how they got that itel?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.