Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeInPA

The problem is that gunships like these often hit targets that are in close contact with US forces.

The precision is required to reduce the risk of killing friendlies.


13 posted on 06/03/2014 12:25:26 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter

... and ManPads are making the AC-130’s job increasingly hazardous. Using PGM’s in lieu of mini-guns and the lightweight cannon is a way to gain a little more stand-off range. But that complicates things as Close Air Support becomes, err, a little more distant.


16 posted on 06/03/2014 12:35:08 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: tanknetter
The precision is required to reduce the risk of killing friendlies.

Understood. My entire concept of warfare against Muslims is on a different level. Friendlies would be on the ground under completely different circumstances. In other words, only after all water, fuel, crops have been tainted or destroyed. The enemy would be carpet bombed by B-52's until Muslims are either dead or deaf. Friendlies are only needed when a dead Muslim isn't good enough and a live one is needed or when we are trying to hold ground. Holding ground includes identifying the enemy, e.g., check points. Enemy identified equals enemy dead. I like I said before, I don't care about collateral damage. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq should have been concluded by 2002. With Iran surrounded, Iran should have been conquered in 2003.

25 posted on 06/03/2014 2:41:28 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (We need to fundamentally transform RATs lives for their lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson