Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Europe to Canada: 'Sorry we rejected you; we really want your oil sands after all'
Hotair ^ | 06/05/2014 | Erika Johnsen

Posted on 06/05/2014 2:00:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

One of the reasons eco-radicals harbor such strong distaste for the Keystone XL pipeline is because they believe that Canada should quixotically eschew the economic opportunities in their oil sands and instead leave those natural resources in the ground. Their quest to kill the pipeline has therefore always been epically illogical, since Canada will and has found a way to get their oil to market, either to our Gulf refineries via rail transport or else by building their own domestic pipelines out to the coasts for shipment by sea.

These Keystone XL-hatin’ eco-radicals almost had a helpful partner in the European Union, which — heeding the complaint that oil sands are somewhat more carbon-intensive than conventional crude — was all ready with legislation meant to encourage the use of cleaner transport fuels by slapping heavy and deliberately discriminatory penalties on imports of Canada’s oil sands. Canada was all ready to get to work and trade with Asian countries anyway, but all the better if they can open up the European market, too — and Europe’s newfound skittishness about energy security and eagerness to reduce dependence on Russia has the bloc looking to diversify its supplies.

I mentioned last month that the EU was rethinking its high-minded pooh-poohing of the oil sands, and it looks like Canada may actually get its wish in the form of a major reversal on those forthcoming EU regulations that will instead allow Canada’s oil sands to do steady business there, via the Financial Times:

Canada today exports little crude to Europe, but it has plans to increase those exports if new pipelines are built linking the oil sands to ports, such as TransCanada’s proposed Energy East project to take oil from Alberta to the east coast. …

Chris Davies, a European parliamentarian on the environment committee, said that Connie Hedegaard, the EU climate commissioner, had lost out to stronger voices in the commission with industrial and trade portfolios. “She got beat,” Mr Davies said. …

The latest draft of the EU legislation is a reversal from earlier versions of the plan, which would have required fuel suppliers to disclose the carbon footprint of the original crude oil that was used to make their products, and stay below maximum limits for associated emissions. …

Under the new methodology, companies will only have to make their emission cuts based on EU averages for the “output” fuels – the petrol or diesel – regardless of whether it was originally made from heavy crude or not.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; energy; europe; oilsands

1 posted on 06/05/2014 2:00:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
they believe that Canada should quixotically eschew the economic opportunities in their oil sands and instead leave those natural resources in the ground.

Leaving toxins in the ground doesn't do any good. They can poison the well. They don't benefit things down there.

And at the beach, tar washes up from the bottom of the sea and pollutes the beaches.

That's like saying our mountains are healthier with naturally occurring radioactive elements in them.

2 posted on 06/05/2014 2:03:14 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

3 posted on 06/05/2014 2:19:39 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

“As they say” a pollutant is a resource out of place.

It’s all a question of management, and it goes by definition that nothing on the face of this mortal coil is going to be absolutely perfect! On the other hand, with wisdom (and with proper regard to the Lord) it can be pretty blessed.

I hope the Keystone gets under way after all, of course with good, robust engineering.


4 posted on 06/05/2014 2:20:41 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
required fuel suppliers to disclose the carbon footprint of the original crude oil that was used to make their products, and stay below maximum limits for associated emissions. …
.
make their emission cuts based on EU averages for the “output” fuels – the petrol or diesel

Toon Town, baby.

5 posted on 06/05/2014 2:20:57 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
a pollutant is a resource out of place

And a weed is any plant you don't want in your garden.

6 posted on 06/05/2014 2:21:33 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Who doesn’t want a yardful of dandelions?


7 posted on 06/05/2014 2:24:13 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

What do you mean?

BTW, the emissions associated with extracting and upgrading the oil sands are put on Canada’s account. The new rules will simply avoid double-counting.


8 posted on 06/05/2014 4:45:06 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
What do you mean?

I mean the whole circus around keeping track of a harmless gas by means of convoluted accounting is looney toons.

ToonTown

9 posted on 06/05/2014 4:53:08 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They will have to invade Maine to get their pipeline reversed. The econazis here have worked to stop the reversal of the flow from Canada to the coast where it could be shipped to Europe.

I suspect the invaders will be supported by the gun toters and oposed by the folks who don’t own guns. Sort of a one sided battle. Once the take them out we will sell them all of the oil they want.


10 posted on 06/05/2014 6:53:23 PM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Agreed!


11 posted on 06/06/2014 10:34:04 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson