Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Lindsey Graham Wins GOP Nod in South Carolina [How Did We Get This Catastrophe?]
CBSNews ^ | June 10, 2014

Posted on 06/10/2014 9:24:49 PM PDT by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 06/10/2014 9:24:49 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Well, I am happy to see Tim Scott won.


2 posted on 06/10/2014 9:26:19 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Resist in place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Lee Bright simply failed to be South Carolina’s Chris McDaniel. You can put the loss on him and the idiot voters.


3 posted on 06/10/2014 9:26:47 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If folks split the vote, that’s what they can expect. Most of the time.


4 posted on 06/10/2014 9:28:25 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

How did we get this catastrophe?

Must have been his Bette Davis Eyes that mesmerized. (I seem to remember he had a picture of the actress on his website a while back and a picture of himself that emphasized his large and heavily lashed eyes.)


5 posted on 06/10/2014 9:29:23 PM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; All

We ended up with this because Lindsay didn’t out right attack the tea party like that arrogant SOB Cantor


6 posted on 06/10/2014 9:34:01 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

SC just voted to take it in the behinds from Lindsey Graham. Bet he does not kiss them before he leaves.


7 posted on 06/10/2014 9:34:28 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Just doing laps around the sun and shaking my head that progressives can believe what they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Does South Carolina have an open primary?

I’ll guess Lindsey is fairly popular with Blacks and Hispanics, who make up more than 33% of state residents.

By the way, Graham is an excellent and charming politician.

Many people in SC like him on a personal level.


8 posted on 06/10/2014 9:39:28 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Because useful idiots continue listening to GOP sycophants who spread the lie that a Republican siding with Democrats is better than a Democrat.

Then they complain when the closet Democrat sides with Democrats.

then they vow to never do it again.

Then they do it again.

Thank those GOP sycophants because many make FR their home.


9 posted on 06/10/2014 9:39:32 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The deeply entrenched are extremely hard to unseat. I’m sure that there were many crossover votes to ensure this RINO stayed right where he is. SC needs to stop allowing open primaries!

We have our losses, but we are winning the game. TEA is the only group in the nation that is infiltrating and making a big difference. The movement is only 5 years old. We need to look at the successes. They are simply amazing!


10 posted on 06/10/2014 9:40:52 PM PDT by stilloftyhenight (...staying home isn't an option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Someone over saturated the field with lots if so called tea party candidates . If there had been just one minnie mccain might have joined Cantor.


11 posted on 06/10/2014 9:41:52 PM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
Graham has dropped to 56.4% but almost all votes are counted. Winner L. Graham (i) 56.4% 177,428 L. Bright 15.4% 48,572 R. Cash 8.3% 26,039 D. Bowers 7.3% 22,988 N. Mace 6.2% 19,518 B. Connor 5.3% 16,772 B. Dunn 1.0%
12 posted on 06/10/2014 9:43:04 PM PDT by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stilloftyhenight

What were his final numbers? Last I saw he was around 55/56%, hardly a trouncing of six under-funded, inexperienced politicians. Especially when he bragged he had $13 mil going into this race and a statewide organization in place.

He probably shouldn’t be crowing quite so loud or someone’s probably going to pick up on his underwhelming victory.


13 posted on 06/10/2014 9:44:21 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: amihow

BINGO!!
the Candidates split the vote six against one uber rich fairy? Puhleeze!


14 posted on 06/10/2014 9:45:44 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: amihow
Someone over saturated the field with lots if so called tea party candidates . If there had been just one minnie mccain might have joined Cantor.

Gramnesty needed 50% +1 vote to win outright tonight and avoid a runoff, which he did. Even if all the votes of every challenger tonight had gone to just one challenger, Gramnesty still would have received over 50% of the vote.

15 posted on 06/10/2014 9:48:38 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

“defeating six tea party challengers”

Which part of “divide and lose” don’t you understand?

If six conservatives had split the vote against Cantor, there wouldn’t be anything to celebrate tonight.


16 posted on 06/10/2014 9:50:11 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Well he must have had some fear of the possibility of a runoff, since he dropped the “I-word” (Impeachment) last week.


17 posted on 06/10/2014 9:50:42 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (No Mo (zilla). I'm going to the Opera instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Gramnesty needed 50% +1 vote to win outright tonight and avoid a runoff, which he did. Even if all the votes of every one of his challengers had gone to just one challenger, Gramnesty still would have received over 50% of the vote and won outright.


18 posted on 06/10/2014 9:53:09 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

CROSS OVER VOTING FROM THE RATS.


19 posted on 06/10/2014 9:55:21 PM PDT by ZULU (Impeach Obama NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

again. too many challengers. split the conservative vote. depressed the conservative vote. split or stopped the inflow of conservative money. i gave to brat. could never figure out who was the conservative leader in SC, so i never sent any money.


20 posted on 06/10/2014 9:56:12 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson