Posted on 06/12/2014 12:02:19 PM PDT by PoloSec
Whenever a tragedy occurs involving guns, it’s almost a guarantee that a liberal Democrat will immediately put pen to paper and create a bunch of new gun control laws with the intent of shoving them through Congress.
Guns scare liberals. However, their fear isn’t focused on gun violence occurring in schools, but on the ability of a free people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government, which they for some strange reason, seem to support.
Well it seems that Sen. Dianne Feinstein in California is never one to let a good shooting go to waste, as immediately following the mass murder perpetrated by Eilliot Roger, the liberal Democrat introduced a new gun control bill in Congress.
The new bill calls for the allowance of “firearms restraining orders” on any individual who is considered to be a threat.
The government, of course, will be the ones who decide the criteria of what makes an existing or potential gun owner a threat.
From the Gateway Pundit, via Right Wing News:
The bill would prevent an individual from purchasing new guns and give law enforcement the right to confiscate existing guns if the individual is determined to be a threat.
The scariest part of this proposed legislation is the idea that anyone can ask for one of these restraining orders. So, for example, if a gun control activist got ahold of a sign-in sheet from a local gun range, they could start spamming the judicial system with these “gun violence prevention warrants,” claiming that they believe these individuals to be about to commit a crime, and send a squad of police officers to their doorstep to confiscate their firearms. For their own good, of course.
This is nothing more than an attempt by liberals to make further headway in completely banning guns altogether. There is little doubt that legislation like this will be abused by those in positions of authority as a means of silencing the opinion of those who don’t “go along with the program.”
Gun rights activists need to not only stay informed on this bill, but do everything possible to ensure that it doesn’t pass. Being able to own a gun and protect yourself from criminals and government is a fundamental right, and it must be fought for with vigor.
Please share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you support the Second Amendment and will fight for your right to own a firearm.
People are going to need their guns to fight back the Rice and Bean munching hordes pouring across the southern border
Molôn Labé!
So if your ex-spouse decides to make life rough for you, they can dime you out, then it’s on you to prove you’re “not a threat.”
“So if your ex-spouse decides to make life rough for you”
They can do that now with a regular restraining order, cops come to serve the order and take any firearms you have.
Standard divorce tactic.
It should take a jury to take a way RTKBA.
I would like to report that Sen. Dianne Feinstein is a threat.
It’s her security detail you’d have to disarm. I’m sure she doesn’t carry personally.
Just keep talking, I’m reloading.
Ok. She and her armed guards are threats.
A freedom stealing, commie biotch! It appears Feinswine has a problem with freedom and the Bill of Rights. Most communists and Nazis do.
Until word got out and she had her personal tax-supported guards take over, the ugly old hag hypocrite.
Sorry Feinswine, America is running from the Islamofascists all over the world as it is being invaded by invaders from the south. You or no other Nazi pig is taking my guns. It will be a cold day in hell.
Diane and Shuscum, don’t hide behind the law, just come up to my door and try to take em.
what these libs do not understand is that the fact that Americans own guns is the main reason why Japan did not invade the mainland. General Yamamoto said it best “we can’t invade the mainland because behind every blade of grass will be an American with a gun.” The Japanese air force would of lasted a few minutes only plus the Japanese land army would never of gone past LA thanks to an armed population. you can thank gun owners for the reason your not speaking Japanese right now.
Nowhere in this is the idea that guns would be taken from hardened, violent criminals. Their intention is to leave them in the hands of the crooks, but take them from honest, non-violent citizens.
In the face of a false threat/charge against me I would indeed be a threat——count on it. It’s happened before and results in career damage to the appropriate dumbasses.
The government will confiscate guns from anyone deemed a potential threat?
Feinstein, three seconds after the bill is signed into law, will determine every gun owner is a potential threat. All guns should be confiscated by force of law.
I mean, come on Dianne. What’s with this halfhearted, one step ahead scheme? You can scheme better than that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.