Skip to comments.Sarah Palin sounds off on Eric Cantorís loss
Posted on 06/12/2014 2:39:23 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
Former vice presidential candidate discusses the state of the GOP
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...
“The status quo has got to go.”
No brief over all description of what was said?
Uh. Yeah. Tricked into listening to Hannity first? No.
“No brief over all description of what was said?”
I would like a brief description, also. But, in my case it’s because of hearing loss. I can’t hear the utube stuff, and if they have print also, it’s aways covered up halfway across and the printed words are often obviously incorrect.
I’m sorry about your hearing difficulty.
Isn’t there a program out there that can grab audio out there so you can read it?
Hannity and Palin have a wide ranging discussion about the state of the GOP in the remainder of 2014. They start with Brat’s defeat of Cantor, discuss Obama’s role in current events, and move onto Hillary Clinton’s past and future roles in the failed foreign affairs policies and domestic politics. Hillary’s comments about the five Al Qaeda / Taliban terrorists are featured.
This is a rush transcript from "Hannity," June 11, 2014. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.
June 11, 2014
Palin: Pundits 'over-thinking' Cantor's primary loss http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/transcript/2014/06/12/palin-pundits-over-thinking-cantors-primary-loss
@ KC_Lion & Lakeshark:
PALIN: Yes. It's the whole ball of wax. Throw in there also amnesty because the people realize that amnesty will decimate Main Street. You know, flooding foreign citizens into the country, competing for American jobs will flat-line our incomes and will create even more unemployment for American workers. So throw that one in there, too.
Wow. That's weird. Sounds like Sarah Palin has a policy against "amnesty" and illegal immigration, but we know that can't be true, because Palin was on O'Reilly 4 or 6 or ten years ago and chiseled her policy in stone... LOL! :)
Today was the FIRST DAY that I can think of when Sarah actually said that she was against Amnesty. Prior to that, I had only heard weasel words, like “the border is broke, we have to fix it”...which is wide open to interpretation.
Maybe she learned something from Brat’s win?
Thank you kindly!
The Link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAYR3JJriXA
Throw in there also amnesty because the people realize that amnesty will decimate Main Street. You know, flooding foreign citizens into the country, competing for American jobs will flat-line our incomes and will create even more unemployment for American workers. So throw that one in there, too.
Think about what our unemployment rate would be if we didn't have 30+ Million illegals here.
I just can’t listen to Hannity who I believe is a RINO too!
Hannity is a total mouthpiece for Rupert Murdoch.
He hasn’t a thought of his own to his name.
I think we’ve all recognized this immigration issue as a major problem going back to Reagan and nobody will shut the border down.
Thanks, yep 5 terrorist generals for on traitor.
Sarah Palin is used to draw in conseratives to Fox News so they can be fed GOPe propaganda-talking points.
Don't worry about me. I'll listen to Fox 24-7 and still be a conservative.
Fox can use Sarah and I'm glad they do. Watching her is like a breath of fresh air.
We all know her definitive written policy position from the O'reilly interview trumps all. We know this from the blue inker for perpetual fact. Just ask him..........
What, was this the twentieth time since the O'Blowhard interview? Hah, doesn't count. She said "registration" once.
I’ll watch videos of her and other guests of my choosing, but I will not watch FNC.
I prefer looking at the news online including here at FR.
In this sound-byte Palin talks down Amnesty. That’s great. It doesn’t address what to do with the illegals, but the topic of this interview was Cantor loss, and the GOPe.
If her plan turns out to be denying services and repatriation, I can support her.
If it turns out to be registering and remaining in place, it will have the same affect as Amnesty. It will be seen as something that will give others in foreign nations hope that they can obtain some of the same.
It will also legalize between 20 to 35 million illegals in our nation once they register, and set in motion chain immigration that will swamp us with Democrat voters.
*Somewhat rhetorical questions*
Palin in recent years has come out against amnesty. Now who else can we remember having done that? Oh yes, John McCain and Ted Kennedy. Are you going to jump on board their plan too? Hey, they said they didn’t support an amnesty!
They had plans to register illegal aliens and let them remain in place. In 2010, Palin was saying the same exact thing.
She has never refuted registration and remain in place, and so at this point I can only say she opposes amnesty. So what does that mean to her? Honestly, I don’t know.
I sure didn’t support McCain/Kennedy, after them promising they didn’t support amnesty.
Sounds like "register and remain in place" to me.
And of course some folks evidently think the new arrival of children is the sum total of our illegal alien exposure.
She's so decisive, unlike our other so-called "leaders".
They just talk, like a lot of people. Palin means what she says, and she means that American jobs are for Americans.
We have between 20 and 35 million illegals in country today. That’s 20 to 35 million jobs already taken from U.S. citizens. And yet some decisive individuals who seek to represent us, cannot muster the courage to state these folks need to leave, so our own citizens can be employed.
Odd that Hillary! has more class than some on this board...
Odd that Hillary Clinton definitely knows more than some people on this thread.
And somehow he actually thinks he's not stupid........
He thinks the blue ink sshields him from his own insanity........
What’s the one thing we know about Hillary?
Evidently you and the other moron don’t know.
Hillary doesn’t do her own dirty work.
She farms it out.
So quoting something she has said reveals ignorance so vast, it’s unworthy of doing more than laugh at it and make a short comment in passing.
She hires political hit-men to take her opponents out. She gets them to dig and release scandalous information. If it requires more, she’ll hire private eyes to intimidate or take physical action as required.
Think Hillary soils her hands to actually do any of this in public?
Quote the broad all you folks want to. Then watch her minions pounce on your candidate full tilt.
Comfort yourselves now while you can, while I recognize you as the sophomoric imbeciles you are.
I'm beginning to think there should be a sanity test (or at least an IQ test) on the blue one.......
You can’t even figure out who we’re talking about.
The points were made about Hillary.
Well, I’m not particularly happy I needed to make it, but it seems like some Conservative should.
Hillary! is toast. Karl Rove sank that battle
axeship with a full spread amidships when he threw the "brain damage" thingee out there:
Cross Eyed Hillary Appears on Conan O'Brien
click on the pic for the Youtube video. What a hoot!
I think it's kind of strange that some freepers will continuously attack Sarah Palin because she won't "read verbatim" one of their little Manifestos having to do with this issue or that issue. Apparently, they want her to sit in front of a camera like a jihadi prisoner and quack their favorite lines. And they'd probably like to hold her at gunpoint, while they wear their little ski mask & their USA head sash, and scream at Sarah like Rage Boy.
She's too much of a leader for that particular fantasy.
*Needs an amendment*
Hillary doughy one Appears on FR
And yet the same himbos come here to protect the decisive one who isn’t running.
Says the guy who thought the comment he was referring to was about Sarah Palin.
Dang that must hurt...
Rhapsody Stupidity in blue*
The man jes cain't hep hissef. He's got bluearrhea.......
I don’t understand what the problem that some freepers have with Sarah Palin.
I mean, if they want an American “leader” to quack their little Manifestos, they should just go to Valerie Jarrett and bring a satchel of cash to have Obimbo excrete their agenda out his mouth.
Deport the illegal immigrants? That’ll be 15 million in the DNC “walking around money” account.
The networks & the newspapers are extra.
Perhaps if you do your best to up your game and concentrate, then think about it real hard, you’ll be able to do some research and find out who has been posting in blue on this thread.
New onslaught of kids over the last several months, clarity.
Old onslaught over the last 24 years, crickets.
Yeah, it must be very hard to have to defend someone who pretends to want to lead, when they don’t explain what they’d do if they did run and won.
“I just don’t know...” LMAO
Hint: He has no cash, he has no brain, no capacity for seeing how stupid he looks (yet he keeps posting to remove all doubt), and he quacks in blue....
The malevolence about Sarah Palin is breath-taking. She won’t read the “Manifesto” - Rage Boy comes out to play.
So now expecting the people who wish to take a leadership role to explain what they would do with one of the biggest challenges facing our nation today, is asking too much of that person????
It’s tantamount to demanding a they recite a manifesto that hasn’t been written? Really?
Wow, you two were off playing when the mental faculties were handed out, weren’t you.
We demand to know where Democrats stand on issues. Why can’t we demand those who wish to lead us explain where they stand?
It’s now a sign of rage, to expect those who wish to lead us to explain where they stand on the most important issue facing our nation today.
Unfricking believable, the man is sick in the head. He must have realized that Breitbart was talking about him when he said that those from the right who helped the libs savage her were like animals with no souls.
Maybe he realizes that, and still needs to rage.....
Whats her name to the rescue in 3...2...1....
Sick in the head, is evidenced by blindly following someone who hasn’t explained what their policy will be for between 20-35 million illegal immigrants inside the United States.
If a person does 99% of what we want, then allows upwards of 150 to 200 million new immigrants from Central and South America in under 20 years, the nation will still be done for.
Voting in numbers upwards of 70% for the Democrats who will promise them anything, the Republican Party, the Tea Party, and the nation will be done for.
No, lets not talk about it until it’s a done deal...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.