Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Central America Newspapers Tout Open US Door for Illegal Minors
Newsmax ^ | Jun 11, 2014 | Todd Beamon

Posted on 06/13/2014 7:48:33 PM PDT by Ray76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: VerySadAmerican

“The Texas governor can call up the National Guard in the event of an emergency. It’s done all the time during hurricanes. If this isn’t an emergency I don’t know what is.”

I agree, however, what is the Guard going to do? Seriously. It wouldn’t be possible to literally grab each one of them and throw them back. You can’t shoot them. Imagine how that would play out. Seriously, it is a real conundrum for the conservatives and the states.
Throwing Bamby out on his ear and making immediate changes to the policy would be the only place to start. And, that would take time to develop.
I would like to read some logical ideas on what people really think would work in the near, and long, term.


21 posted on 06/13/2014 8:30:47 PM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Buses don’t randomly appear all over our country without a coordinated effort. There’s only one source of that effort, and the fact that the executive branch is banning photos tells us exactly who did it, and how they plan to control the message. This is truly unimaginable.


22 posted on 06/13/2014 8:36:48 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Bookmark


23 posted on 06/13/2014 8:41:01 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

This is not directed at you personally.

What can be expected from a person with a murky past, numerous indications of foreign birth, and who refuses to properly identify themselves?

REAP IT YOU IDIOTS.


24 posted on 06/13/2014 8:43:07 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Our government should either ask the paper to retract and/or place an ad in the paper.

"Our government" probably told the paper how to write the article. Note that the Jeh Johnson quotes are a virtual invitation.

"Our government" is orchestrating this travesty.

25 posted on 06/13/2014 8:47:17 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mark3681
Throwing Bamby out on his ear and making immediate changes to the policy would be the only place to start. And, that would take time to develop. I would like to read some logical ideas on what people really think would work in the near, and long, term.

Congress can, I believe, override an Executive Order (which is what DACA is).

However, that would take both the House and the Senate, so no action could take place until next January. And I wonder if the Republicans have the gumption to consider repeal the "Dreamer" Executive Order.

The Congress can also defund the program. But what would they defund? The refugee shelters? Food and clothing for the children? I don't think so.

Time to pray for a strong Republican leader to emerge...

26 posted on 06/13/2014 8:57:25 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mark3681

First of all the guard could seal the border. That would be a good start at telling Obama to go eff himself.


27 posted on 06/13/2014 9:07:04 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

IMPEACH OBAMA!


28 posted on 06/13/2014 9:28:31 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

These children don’t qualify for DACA. To qualify certain criteria have to be met Including;

Continuously resided in the United States from June 15, 2007 (last five years) to the present

Been physically present in the United States on June 15, 2012, as well as at the time of requesting deferred action from USCIS;

Entered without inspection before June 15, 2012, or had any lawful immigration status expired on or before June 15, 2012

CC


29 posted on 06/13/2014 9:34:00 PM PDT by Captain Compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

30 posted on 06/13/2014 9:38:11 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen (DEFUND the GOPe it wants our money, our votes, but NOT our principles/values/beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

They are using their freedom of the press to exploit our country.


31 posted on 06/13/2014 9:39:26 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

can’t disagree. At times I just want the cards to fall so people there is no rational argument for ever going this route again. The American people reelecting Obama was the single dumbest act in our history. 2008, I understand. It was clear he was going to move close to utter destruction this term. Of course the consultants didn’t want to be critical of Obama in 2012, so our party dunces share a good amount of blame, too.

Bottom line, you are right. Reap it.


32 posted on 06/13/2014 9:42:54 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

CALL OUT THE NATIONAL GUARDS FROM OUR SOUTHERN BORDER STATES !


33 posted on 06/13/2014 9:46:50 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
The Texas Constitution lists three reasons for the Governor to call forth the militia

> to execute the laws of the State
> to suppress insurrections
> to repel invasions

There is an invasion.

The Texas statutes define “the militia” as:

> the state military forces
> and the reserve militia

“State military forces” means:

> the Texas National Guard
> the Texas State Guard
> and any other active militia or military force organized under state law

“Reserve militia” means:

> the persons liable to serve, but not serving, in the state military forces.

It is clear that the necessary conditions have been met and that Governor Perry can call forth a large number of persons to repel the invasion.

Make the call, Governor.


Tex. Gov. Code

Sec. 431.071. MILITARY DUTY. (a) The reserve militia is not subject to active military duty, except that the governor may call into service the portion of the reserve militia needed for the period required in case of war, insurrection, invasion or prevention of invasion, suppression of riot, tumult, or breach of peace or to aid civil officers to execute law or serve process.

Sec. 431.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) “Reserve militia” means the persons liable to serve, but not serving, in the state military forces.

(1-a) “Servicemember” has the meaning assigned by Section 161.551, Health and Safety Code.

(2) “State militia” means the state military forces and the reserve militia.

(3) “State military forces” means the Texas National Guard, the Texas State Guard, and any other active militia or military force organized under state law.

(4) “Texas National Guard” means the Texas Army National Guard and the Texas Air National Guard.

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/GV/htm/GV.431.htm#431.001


Tex. Const. art. 4, § 7

COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF MILITARY FORCES; CALLING FORTH MILITIA. He shall be Commander-in-Chief of the military forces of the State, except when they are called into actual service of the United States. He shall have power to call forth the militia to execute the laws of the State, to suppress insurrections, and to repel invasions.

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CN/htm/CN.4.htm#4.7

34 posted on 06/13/2014 10:19:56 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Seems to me Governor Brewer could have some vehicles impounded and some fines levied...

A.R.S. § 13-2929. Unlawful transporting, moving, concealing, harboring or shielding of unlawful aliens; vehicle impoundment; exception; classification

A. It is unlawful for a person who is in violation of a criminal offense to:

1. Transport or move or attempt to transport or move an alien in this state, in furtherance of the illegal presence of the alien in the United States, in a means of transportation if the person knows or recklessly disregards the fact that the alien has come to, has entered or remains in the United States in violation of law.

2. Conceal, harbor or shield or attempt to conceal, harbor or shield an alien from detection in any place in this state, including any building or any means of transportation, if the person knows or recklessly disregards the fact that the alien has come to, has entered or remains in the United States in violation of law.

3. Encourage or induce an alien to come to or reside in this state if the person knows or recklessly disregards the fact that such coming to, entering or residing in this state is or will be in violation of law.

B. A means of transportation that is used in the commission of a violation of this section is subject to mandatory vehicle immobilization or impoundment pursuant to section 28-3511.

C. A law enforcement official or agency of this state or a county, city, town or other political subdivision of this state may not consider race, color or national origin in the enforcement of this section except to the extent permitted by the United States or Arizona Constitution.

D. In the enforcement of this section, an alien’s immigration status may be determined by:

1. A law enforcement officer who is authorized by the federal government to verify or ascertain an alien’s immigration status.

2. The United States immigration and customs enforcement or the United States customs and border protection pursuant to 8 United States Code section 1373(c).

E. This section does not apply to a child protective services worker acting in the worker’s official capacity or a person who is acting in the capacity of a first responder, an ambulance attendant or an emergency medical technician and who is transporting or moving an alien in this state pursuant to title 36, chapter 21.1.

F. A person who violates this section is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor and is subject to a fine of at least one thousand dollars, except that a violation of this section that involves ten or more illegal aliens is a class 6 felony and the person is subject to a fine of at least one thousand dollars for each alien who is involved.

http://azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/13/02929.htm&Title=13&DocType=ARS


35 posted on 06/13/2014 10:23:47 PM PDT by Ray76 (True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
SEND THEM BACK!!!
36 posted on 06/13/2014 11:27:05 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

If I were the governor of one of these border states, I’d call up my National Guard, put them all on the border, and send back as many of these kids as I could catch.


37 posted on 06/13/2014 11:29:53 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

How can you be against the “children” We will now see the parents of these children brought in because we all know that children need thier parents! welcome obama amnesty while your government cowers in the corner afraid and neutered king a##hat checkmates you again


38 posted on 06/14/2014 3:53:21 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76; Jim Robinson; trooprally; GOPJ; Reaganite Republican; Republicanprofessor; All

” - - - It is clear that the necessary conditions have been met and that Governor Perry can call forth a large number of persons to repel the invasion.

Make the call, Governor. - - - - “

As usual, the permissive Republicans in State and Federal Offices are permitting Obama to destroy America.

Why are elected Republicans so cowardly about doing their duty of protecting us American Citizens from arrogantly lawless Government Officials?


39 posted on 06/14/2014 8:09:16 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun; All

Since they are “the children,” dogs and machine gun nests are not yet PC.

Tear gas mortars, flash bang mortars fired as far as possible into Mexico would create a temporarily adequate “no children” zone to allow the State National Guard troops to string miles of Concertina wire barriers to the Illegal Alien Invasion of “the children” brought in through the Hostile Nation of Mexico.

“The children” are the Drug Cartels’ Trojan Horse to freely smuggler in Drugs.

“The children,” are also Obama’s Trojan Horse to bring in millions of future Democrat Party voters.


40 posted on 06/14/2014 8:22:25 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson