To: OneVike
As much as I dislike Hitlery she did exactly as an good attorney would and should do.
Yes the man was despicable and guilty but she did a good job as an attorney.
4 posted on
06/16/2014 3:58:56 PM PDT by
RWGinger
To: RWGinger
She did not have to take the case. She took it only because a Democrat DA asked her to.
It was political on her part from the beginning.
5 posted on
06/16/2014 4:00:41 PM PDT by
OneVike
(I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
To: RWGinger
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”The woman was fired because she didn't meet the minimum ethical standards to be a lawyer - to be a lawyer?
Who knew they even had standards...
13 posted on
06/16/2014 4:07:39 PM PDT by
Aevery_Freeman
(Historians will refer to this administration as "The Half-Black Plague.")
To: RWGinger
“...she did exactly as an good attorney would and should do”
That may be true, but it certainly plays into the stereotype
of a conniving, cynical, weasel lawyer. Lawyers can be good without that snarky arrogant attitude.
28 posted on
06/16/2014 5:39:36 PM PDT by
odawg
To: RWGinger
Attorneys sell out their clients all the time. They have to play nice with the prosecutors to win other cases.
41 posted on
06/17/2014 5:32:50 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson