Cheney re Obama: Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many.
Posted on 06/17/2014 4:53:18 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Edited on 06/17/2014 8:01:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Cheney re Obama: Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many.
As the terrorists of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) threaten Baghdad, thousands of slaughtered Iraqis in their wake, it is worth recalling a few of President Obama's past statements about ISIS and al Qaeda. "If a J.V. team puts on Lakers' uniforms that doesn't make them Kobe Bryant" (January 2014). "[C]ore al Qaeda is on its heels, has been decimated" (August 2013). "So, let there be no doubt: The tide of war is receding" (September 2011).
Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong about so much at the expense of so many. Too many times to count, Mr. Obama has told us he is "ending" the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan—as though wishing made it so. His rhetoric has now come crashing into reality. Watching the black-clad ISIS jihadists take territory once secured by American blood is final proof, if any were needed, that America's enemies are not "decimated." They are emboldened and on the march.
Excellent article.
However, there is no coherent opposition movement in the United States challenging the murderous thuggery and muslim nationalistic homo communism of this administration.
Monorprise gave essentially the same response, and I think you both make a good point.
What I meant by that was that if we do a half-a**ed job of going after Obama, he would more or less be inoculated from future moves to impeach unless something simply explosive was revealed.
Once the Senate took a pass on Clinton, he was able to do pretty much what he wanted. They weren’t going to impeach again. The Republicans in the House had already been humiliated once.
I think that same dynamic would play out unless like I said, a bombshell was revealed.
At GS-whatever salaries that’s a half-billion dollars, easily, on annual salary spends. What are they all doing?
But he is on the right side of any issue none of the time.
What does that tell you?
Is it incompetence,... or deliberate planned malice?
Bush’s idiotic “strategery” of playing it cagey, never defending himself against his critics or speaking up against Obama’s treachery, is a lot of the reason why we’re where we are today.
“Does anyone actually know if he is any good at chasing a little white ball? “
This blog, supposedly put together by Hill Staffers, suggests that Obama likes golf primarily for the extra-curricular activities in the club house sauna afterwards.
It makes a list of golfing buddies who are not really good at golf and seem gay.
Also, his golf outings last way too long for a normal round.
http://hillbuzz.org/is-barack-obama-gay/obamas-golfing-buddies
“Is it incompetence,... or deliberate planned malice? “
It sounds over the top tin foil to say that the President of the US is deliberately trying to hurt the country, but consider the meme of “I found out from the papers myself!” and “The video did it!”
Or, “Gee, we thought everyone would be happy we traded Bergdahl!”
We know these are lies.
Hard not to figure that Obama is faking incompetence to cover nefarious policy.
One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole economy.
The only doctrine of Øbama I can discern is: no doctrine that helps the USA in any way, shape or form.
That’s the Øbama doctrine.
People keep looking at it from the wrong angle: there is a doctrine, and it is proceeding exactly according to plan.
The only things that are collapsing are American economy, American might, American culture, American exceptionalism and American good will. Just as 0bama planned.
Yep. Too many “gentlemen legislators” on the good side. The bad side has nothing but smart ass punks.
The “mission accomplished” sign had nothing to do with Bush.
It was an aircraft carrier coming back home from a long tour of duty and the sign was for the sailors coming home. It was to honor them that they had accomplished their mission.
The twisting of the story since is just plain evil.
Obama’s Cloward-Piven doctrine is doing just fine.
A foreign enemy combatant illegally installed in our White House to destroy America for the communist and Islamist buddies he’s surrounded himself with his entire life - who orchestrated his Harvard law degree and for whom he used that law degree to implement the Cloward-Piven Plan to destroy America from within.
Right now would be a good time to ask the LA Times why they wouldn’t allow anybody to see the video of Obama yukking it up with his Islamic terrorist buddies - BEFORE Americans decided whether to vote for the guy who is aiding our terrorist enemies and inviting them to waltz across our border and get all our hard-earned money to support them.
Obama is foreign. Can it be called treason when he may or may not even be a US citizen? But the LA Times folks, who withheld from voters critical information related to national security, was in a very real sense providing material aid and comfort to America’s enemies at that time. If the editors at LA Times are US citizens they have some explaining to do, as to why they should not be charged with treason.
Why have not the Human Shields of December 2002 that moved into
Iraq to protect it’s citizens from GW Bush returned to protect them from ISIS?
Cue Arpaio...
That’s about it huh...
But it’s all Bush’s fault that the Obama doctrine is discredited./s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.