Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cleta Mitchell to the IRS: Answer this
Powerline ^ | June 16, 2014 | Scott Johnson

Posted on 06/17/2014 5:32:12 PM PDT by QT3.14

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: QT3.14

Makes one yearn for honest presidents like Richard Nixon.


21 posted on 06/17/2014 6:42:15 PM PDT by kaehurowing (FIGHT BULLYING, UNINSTALL FIREFOX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

He didn’t actually succeed, did he?


22 posted on 06/17/2014 6:55:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14
This could get interesting . . .

The key word here is "spoliation." That term strikes fear into the heart of any lawyer with a shady client. Let me see if I can explain -

Basically, if you are caught destroying evidence that you knew or should have known was relevant to a lawsuit, the court presumes that whatever you destroyed would have proved your opponent's case.

So TTV now won't have to prove that the IRS was illegally using its power to harass the administration's political opponents - it's presumed because the IRS destroyed the documents.

It's basically the death penalty for litigators. What's more, the jury is instructed on spoliation (which irritates them) and the judge will be very annoyed because it's basically contemptuous. And even a liberal judge understands that he can't let any party - even the government - get away with that in his courtroom.

If the penalties for destroying evidence weren't severe, everyone would be doing it.

23 posted on 06/17/2014 7:55:30 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ecce Crucem Domini, fugite partes adversae. Vicit Leo de Tribu Iuda, Radix David, Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
They have been used to harass by the Nixon administration...

To be truthful, Nixon asked his IRS Commissioner if he would undertake some harassment...and his IRS Commissioner told him "Hell, no."

Accordingly, as one of the articles of impeachment being prepared against Nixon, he was accused of attempting to employ the IRS in a campaign of harassment against his enemies.

In this case, it is absolutely provable that the IRS engaged in harassment of Obama's enemies. But, as yet, there is no evidence that they were instructed to do so.

24 posted on 06/17/2014 8:03:49 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

No doubt those emails would implicate at least half of the democrat congress.


25 posted on 06/17/2014 8:18:00 PM PDT by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Justice would be served if a computer or document were found to name Catherine Englebrecht personally, allowing her to sue for a violation of civil rights. That could mean she could go after people individually and they couldn’t hide behind government lawyers. Once they are footing their own bills and looking at losing their own money or even doing time we’d hear some high pitched squealing.


26 posted on 06/21/2014 10:29:39 AM PDT by Baynative (How much longer will the media be able to prop up this administration?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson