Skip to comments.Angry rape victim says Hillary Clinton ‘lied like a dog’ in defending her attacker (VIDEO)
Posted on 06/21/2014 8:31:24 AM PDT by PoloSec
After the Free Beacon discovered and published recordings from Hillary laughing about a 1975 case in which she successfully defended a rapist, the victim of that assault has come out to say shes angry about how Clinton treated her:
When I heard that tape I was pretty upset, I went back to the room and was talking to my two cousins and I cried a little bit. I aint gonna lie, some of this has got me pretty down, she said. But I thought to myself, Im going to stand up to her. Im going to stand up for what Ive got to stand up for, you know?
In her interview with The Daily Beast, she recounted the details of her attack in 1975 at age 12 and the consequences it had for both her childhood and adult life. A virgin before the assault, she spent five days afterwards in a coma, months recovering from the beating that accompanied the rape, and over 10 years in therapy. The doctors told her she would probably never be able to have children.
Amazing what happens when a would-be presidential candidate is actually vetted for once, isnt it? Still waiting on that to happen to Obama
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
lied like a dog ,no no , Lied like Democrat
The woman has zero empathy. We are being ruled by psychopaths.
Hitlery will get the Rapist vote. Fer Sho.
The part where she laughs about it and implies she knew about his guilt should be the preface to EVERY Republican Candidate commercial against her. EVERY TIME!
“...............Lied like a Democrat”
Absolutely. What a Democrat stands for is generally speaking indefensible, thus they lie.
America would be so much better off without them. They aren’t even entertaining anymore.
And they ought to be interviewing her “boss” at the Watergate Hearings. You know, they guy who fired her and said something to the effect that “she was the most dishonest, unethical person he had ever met.” That guy!
And now she’s an islamist.
... Well .... She was the Legal Counsel for the Defense so, like it or not, that was her job. However she did have a choice of whether to accept the job or not.
I feel bad for this poor woman. She does not yet how extremely joe fhe plumbered she is about to be
The “emotionally unstable/tendency to seek out older men/engage in fantasizing” argument is the same argument Hillary used to defend another rapist - her husband - against all of his victims.
And the LIVs love it!
You think "her job" was the character assassination and slutification of a twelve year old virgin rape victim who was also bashed into a coma?
Well then, so much for civilization, eh?
If Hilary’s followers realized how much she absolutely hates females, they’d rip her to shreds.
Instead, they lick her boots while she spits on their heads and laughs.
Within the charter of her job, was it necessary to challenge the character of the victim, a 12 year old girl? That’s the part where I think she crossed the line. Sure, challenge the evidence and push the process for your client. But to speak of an innocent child’s character? It’s a monster who hurts a child.
The Left will probably argue this is irrelevant, “old news” because it happened “so long ago” - this being after Hillary! was fully grown and practicing law as a profession, yet Mitt Romney’s hijinks of allegedly cutting the hair of a guy back when he was a teenager in high school was a big relevant issue.
I even had a freeper tell me that it’s old news because Obama brought it up in 08
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.