Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Military Out of Hellfires in Battle Against ISIS
ABC News ^ | 7: 24 p.m. EDT Saturday, June 21, 2014 | Martha Raddatz

Posted on 06/21/2014 4:38:05 PM PDT by kristinn

The Iraqi military ran out of Hellfire missiles six days ago, and though the U.S. is rushing more missiles into the country, Iraq has only two modified Cessna aircraft to launch them in their battle against the radical Islamic militia ISIS.

ISIS has captured 28 tanks and shot down three helicopters, a significant percentage of the government force, and the militia killed an entire Iraqi Security Force brigade in the last couple of days at the border with Syria, which ISIS now controls.

The losses have left the Iraqi military with no offensive capability, and no real air force.

With the brigade at the border at Al Qaim wiped out, ISIS now controls the territory from Rubiya to Al Qaim. The tribes in Al Qaim tried to fight them, but ISIS unleashed a major artillery barrage, then a major assault, and they could not hold the back.

Taking Al Qaim opens up the entire Euphrates Valley to the insurgents, and ISIS has a safe haven across the border in Syria, which makes air strikes difficult.

Threat of a massive drive into Baghdad has receded somewhat, but fear remains that the radical militia will try big attacks for propaganda victories, or that its forces might take small neighborhoods and publicize its victories on YouTube in an attempt to scare the Shia into overreacting with the militias.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; isis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: SeeSharp

I posted back then, many times on the issue and they sure did KICK OUT the US Forces.

Quoting from an article from that time ...

U.S. Kicked Out Of Iraq

Now the truth about Obama’s Friday (October 21, 2011) announcement about the Iraq war ending is beginning to come out. President Barack H. Obama announced that “After nearly nine years, America’s war in Iraq will be over,” that troops would be coming home by year’s end. That is, IMHO, a serious strategic blunder. But Obama did not ask for my opinion, so U.S. troops will be leaving iraq. The primary effect of the announcement is to end any chance of a substantial U.S. troop presence in Iraq after the end of the year. It was an acknowledgment that Iraqis had refused to agree to a key U.S. condition for remaining American troops: immunity from Iraqi law, that any U.S. military forces to stay would have to be shielded from prosecution or lawsuits, that precipitated the announcement.

Nouri al-Maliki said, “When the Americans asked for immunity, the Iraqi side answered that it was not possible, The discussions over the number of trainers and the place of training stopped. Now that the issue of immunity was decided and that no immunity to be given, the withdrawal has started.” While it is true that some U.S. troops commit offenses, the vast majority do not. The hubris of Iraq and its people after the Hussein regime is breathtaking. After 4,478 killed and 33,169 wounded U.S. troops, not to mention the ouster of Hussein and his two sons, Iraq wants to provide its own security. And with Iran next door. Well, GOOD LUCK!

http://www.conservativedailynews.com/2011/10/u-s-kicked-out-of-iraq/

— — — — —

Apparently you weren’t reading the news about the situation back then.


21 posted on 06/21/2014 5:03:35 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Nuke them both then.


22 posted on 06/21/2014 5:04:22 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Got checkbook?


23 posted on 06/21/2014 5:07:49 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("The Arab Spring is over. Welcome to the Jihadi Spring." Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Maliki rules out extension of U.S. troops’ presence after 2011

BAGHDAD, April 20 (Xinhua) — Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki ruled out signing a new security pact with the United States to extend the presence of U.S. troops in the country, his office said in a statement on Wednesday.

“The Prime Minister rule out possibility for any new security agreement to prolong the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq, because the (current) document of the strategic agreement (SOFA) is clear in this respect,” the statement quoted Maliki as saying in an interview with the local television channel of Biladi to be broadcasted later.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-04/20/c_13838284.htm


24 posted on 06/21/2014 5:09:20 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
We screwed up by de-stabilizing Iraq. Still, a little devil in me wonders what would happen if somebody vaporized Mecca.

I wonder if it would have been any different if we hadn't destabilized Iraq.

However, I do think that as long as we keep pussyfooting with them, we will continue to get what we have been getting.

We are like some conflicted giant, unwilling to use our might to stop the little people from attacking us for fear that we might hurt somebody and people will call us names.

25 posted on 06/21/2014 5:10:24 PM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Send the friggin Brown Clown over to Iraq with a horse to lead them into battle.


26 posted on 06/21/2014 5:10:32 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

I have this mental picture of the Iraqi “military” shooting expensive Hellfire missiles at non-targets. Why? Because it gives the illusion of action while not putting themselves at risk.

Honestly, at this point, I’m not sure I give a rat’s rear end about the situation over there. A pox on all their houses.


27 posted on 06/21/2014 5:11:16 PM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Star Traveler

Evidently it is you who are not doing the reading. The article you posted confirms exactly what I said. Hillary refused to budge on the issue of immunity. We have made exceptions to this before and could have done so this time. It didn’t need to be a deal breaker. It was not the Iraqi’s who ended negotiations. It was the Obama administration.


29 posted on 06/21/2014 5:16:21 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: SeeSharp

Bush HAD that agreement already. Those ISLAMISTS and JIHADISTS over there in that Iraqi Shia government were just itching for their chance to prosecute those US Soldiers, something Bush wouldn’t let them do.

If Obama had let them prosecute our US Soldiers, I would have been all over his case on that issue.


31 posted on 06/21/2014 5:28:43 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
We should stay out of it and let Iraq burn. I think Americans are tired of helping nations and just to get kicked in the ars. Enough is enough.
32 posted on 06/21/2014 5:30:10 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
"Nuking Medina'''"

Not "Funky Cold Medina" anymore....

33 posted on 06/21/2014 5:40:59 PM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
The Iraqi government was not one of Islamists and jihadis (but it soon will be). This issue could have been finessed. A compromise that met the Maliki government's domestic public relations needs could have been found. The Iraqi's knew they were going to be at the mercy of Iran if we left and they wanted us to stay. It is doubtful that any US soldier would ever have been prosecuted for anything - especially since we hardly ever let any of them take leave off base. Hillary ignorantly chose to make this an all or nothing proposition however, and that is what killed the deal.

As for the Bush administration, they punted the issue to their successors. Understandable since giving ground on the immunity issue would have had a political price. Wanna blame it all on Bush?

34 posted on 06/21/2014 5:42:40 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
We screwed up by de-stabilizing Iraq.

Iraq was never stable. Saddam used torture chambers and death squads and kept a lid on the media. He also used wars to rally his people (Iran and Kuwait).

35 posted on 06/21/2014 6:12:54 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

Aaaand what’s the difference between Hoboken and Medina?

/s


36 posted on 06/21/2014 6:25:02 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
"We screwed up by de-stabilizing Iraq."

Who is "we"? When Obama inherited Iraq, things were stable enough for Biden to declare in 2010 that Iraq "would go down as one of the [Obama] administration's greatest triumphs." Apart from the fact that this was entirely premature, it was typical Obama hubris: whatever stability existed then was the result of Bush, not Obama. Obama then withdrew all troops, refused to communicate with Maliki, turned a blind eye to the situation, played golf, and now we have what we have. You can argue about whether we should have gone to Iraq, but Obama did NOT inherit the situation we have now.
37 posted on 06/21/2014 6:42:34 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Guy double Bogey’s, takes Mulligans all day and lies about his score. ...


38 posted on 06/21/2014 7:12:40 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

A safe haven? In Syria? Really? For these killers.


39 posted on 06/21/2014 9:28:55 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Nuke them both then.

Then we would have nothing to hold over their heads.

40 posted on 06/21/2014 10:11:42 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Conservatism is the political disposition of grown-ups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson