Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major Ruling Shields Privacy of Cellphones
New York Times ^ | June 25, 2014 | ADAM LIPTAK

Posted on 06/25/2014 10:17:06 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

Edited on 06/25/2014 10:54:53 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

In a major statement on privacy rights in the digital age, the Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously ruled that the police need warrants to search the cellphones of people they arrest.

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the court, said the vast amount of data contained on modern cellphones must be protected from routine inspection.


(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: cellphone; cellphones; donutwatch; police; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: napscoordinator
Somebody mentioned that they should have added laptops. Probably a good idea. Oh well....next time.

Given the stated reasoning of the decision, it would be virtually impossible to avoid applying the same logic to laptops/tablets. The only reason not to make it explicit now is that properly conducted courts tend to avoid ruling on questions not before them.

21 posted on 06/25/2014 12:06:53 PM PDT by koanhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

No big deal! See IRS and EPA actions. Destruction of evidence is important!! (there needs to be a kill switch that refuses bootup/powering if outside a predetermined proximity of the actual user; even the simple 4 digit code often enabled by phones should be used).


22 posted on 06/25/2014 12:22:41 PM PDT by SgtHooper (This is not my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

It’s possible to remotely wipe a smartphone via a password-protected utility (assuming that the phone can be reached via the Internet). The premium (i.e. monthly/yearly fee) version of LookOut will do that, for example.


23 posted on 06/25/2014 12:44:50 PM PDT by koanhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak
Not counting Obamacare’s death panels
24 posted on 06/25/2014 12:52:17 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

“Not counting Obamacare’s death panels”

Yes you are right, but Kennedy actually was right on this one (and wrote a damn good argument), it was Roberts that went Judas on us. If there is a Roe v Wade on marriage next year, I would not be surprised if Roberts decides to side with the liberals for the sake of the history books.


25 posted on 06/25/2014 1:53:01 PM PDT by BurningOak (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

UNANIMOUS

Yahoo! Not even close which is as it should be.
26 posted on 06/25/2014 2:59:43 PM PDT by Holdem Or Foldem (Life isn't fair, so wear a cup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Does anyone really believe cops are gonna get warrants before checking people’s cellphones? I sure don’t.


27 posted on 06/25/2014 5:26:35 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

SCOTUS has already invalidated such laws. Public employees/officers have no expectation of privacy while engaged in performing their duties in public.

Cities having been making settlements right and left due to officer violations of citizens rights to film.

http://photographyisnotacrime.com/


28 posted on 06/25/2014 8:18:46 PM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police can t solve a problem with violence, they ll find a way to fix it with brute force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Roberts? The same Roberts who stabbed us in the back with Odumbocare? I guess Klownie the Kenyan has no use for him for the moment.


29 posted on 06/26/2014 4:41:08 AM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson